EWTN News portal reports on a June 23–24 meeting at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas (Angelicum) in Rome, organized by the Vatican’s Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue. The gathering, titled “Buddhists, Christians, Hindus, Jains and Sikhs in Europe: Building Fraternity through Dialogue and Collaboration,” aimed to promote interreligious dialogue and cooperation across the continent. Cardinal George Jacob Koovakad, prefect of the dicastery, lamented that fraternity is often viewed as “a utopian idea” and described Europe as a “rich melting pot” of ethnic groups, languages, and religious traditions. The conference reaffirmed a shared commitment “to nurturing a culture of encounter and collaboration for the common good,” with participants expressing hope that such collaboration will inspire wider society. This event is not a gesture of goodwill but a formalization of the very religious indifferentism and apostasy that the pre-conciliar Church condemned as a mortal poison for the soul.
The Theological Bankruptcy of “Fraternity” Without Christ
The entire premise of this meeting rests on a foundation of theological fraud. The concept of “fraternity” promoted here is a naturalistic, horizontal abstraction stripped of its only possible supernatural source: Our Lord Jesus Christ. True fraternity is a fruit of the Redemption, achievable only through incorporation into His Mystical Body, the Catholic Church, by baptism and the profession of the one true Faith. To speak of “fraternity” with Buddhists, Hindus, Jains, and Sikhs while deliberately omitting the necessity of conversion to Catholicism is not dialogue; it is a betrayal of the Great Commission. As Pope Pius XI declared in the encyclical *Mortalium Animos*, “The union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ of those who are separated from it, for in the past they have unhappily left it.” This conciliar initiative does the exact opposite, encouraging non-Christians in their errors while offering them a platform of equality.
Indifferentism as Official Policy
The language employed in the Vatican statement is a textbook manifestation of the heresy of indifferentism, which holds that all religions are equally valid paths to God. Cardinal Koovakad’s description of Europe as a “rich melting pot” of religious traditions to be valued for building “an inclusive, cohesive and harmonious society” directly contradicts the constant teaching of the Magisterium. The Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX explicitly condemned the proposition that “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation” (Proposition 16) and that “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Proposition 18). By extension, this condemnation applies with even greater force to non-Christian religions, which lack the very means of grace. The meeting’s theme, “Building Fraternity through Dialogue and Collaboration,” assumes a fundamental equality between the true Faith and systems of belief that are, in the eyes of the Church, at best naturalistic philosophies and at worst, instruments of demonic deception.
The Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue: A Modernist Engine of Apostasy
The very existence of the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue is a scandal. Its purpose, inherited from the conciliar document *Nostra Aetate*, is not to convert non-Christians but to “promote mutual understanding, respect, and collaboration.” This is a direct assault on the missionary nature of the Church. The pre-conciliar Church understood that dialogue with non-Christians was ordered toward their conversion, not their confirmation in error. The 1928 encyclical *Mortalium Animos* by Pius XI is unequivocal: “The Church has never been accustomed to take part in these assemblies, nor has she ever consented to them, except to condemn them or to warn the faithful against them.” The current structures occupying the Vatican have transformed this condemned practice into a permanent, funded bureaucracy dedicated to undermining the exclusive claims of Christ.
The Omission of the Kingship of Christ
The most glaring omission in the entire report is any mention of the Social Kingship of Jesus Christ. The conference speaks of “human dignity,” “human rights,” and “the common good” as if these abstractions exist independently of divine revelation. Pope Pius XI, in the encyclical *Quas Primas*, established the Feast of Christ the King precisely to remind states and societies that they are “bound to publicly honor Christ and obey Him.” The encyclical states that “the Kingdom of our Redeemer encompasses all men” and that “it matters not whether individuals, families, or states, for men united in societies are no less subject to the authority of Christ than individuals.” By organizing a meeting of world religions under the banner of “fraternity” without once acknowledging Christ’s divine right to rule over all nations, the conciliar sect commits blasphemy. It replaces the peace of Christ with a false peace built on the denial of His unique mediatorship.
The “Culture of Encounter” as a Substitute for Evangelization
The statement notes that participants “reaffirmed the importance of dialogue and collaboration as means of fostering understanding, solidarity and hope.” This is the language of naturalistic humanism, not supernatural faith. The Church’s mission is not to foster “understanding” with error but to preach the Gospel to every creature, calling all men to repent and believe. The “culture of encounter” is a modernist substitute for the hard, uncompromising work of evangelization and conversion. It reduces the Church to a mere NGO, a facilitator of interfaith harmony, rather than the ark of salvation. As St. Pius X warned in *Lamentabili Sane Exitu*, the modernist error consists in making “the science of philosophical things and morals and also civil laws keep aloof from divine and ecclesiastical authority” (Proposition 57). This conference is a practical application of that condemned proposition.
The Complicity of the “Clergy”
Cardinal George Jacob Koovakad, as prefect of this dicastery, bears a grave responsibility. His welcoming address, which lamented that fraternity is seen as “a utopian idea,” reveals a profound ignorance of Catholic theology. Fraternity is not a utopia; it is a supernatural reality within the Church, purchased by the Blood of Christ. To seek it outside the Church, in collaboration with false religions, is to build on sand. The modernist “clergy” who organize and participate in these events are not shepherds but wolves, leading the faithful into the abyss of indifferentism. They are the fulfillment of the prophecy of St. Pius X in *Pascendi Dominici Gregis*, who described the modernist as one who “advances along the road of skepticism, who has abandoned the Catholic faith, and who is seeking to create a new religion, adapted to the wants of the present hour.”
Conclusion: A Call to Reject the Conciliar Apostasy
This meeting is not an isolated incident but a logical fruit of the conciliar revolution. It is the practical implementation of the false principles of *Nostra Aetate* and *Dignitatis Humanae*, which the pre-conciliar popes would have condemned as heretical. The faithful must recognize these interreligious gatherings for what they are: acts of formal cooperation with error, a public denial of the uniqueness of Christ and His Church, and a step toward the establishment of a one-world religion under the banner of human fraternity. The only true fraternity is that which exists in Christ and His Church. All else is a synagogue of Satan.
Source:
Vatican hosts Christians, Dharmic faiths to strengthen fraternity in Europe (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 25.06.2026