On the anniversary of the Dobbs decision, the National Abortion Federation (NAF) — the professional association of abortion providers — publicly declared its support for abortion without any legal restriction throughout all nine months of pregnancy. The cited article from EWTN News reports this development and includes condemnations from pro-life organizations such as Live Action and Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America. What is conspicuously absent from the article, however, is any mention of the objective moral law of God, the infallible teaching of the Church on the absolute sanctity of human life from conception, or the formal cooperation of the conciliar sect in the culture of death through its silence, ambiguity, and practical acceptance of the abortion regime.
The Unmasked Face of the Culture of Death
The NAF’s statement is a chilling but entirely consistent articulation of the culture of death. They declared: “This moment demands a new era of abortion advocacy, one that understands viability and gestational limits are common and equally harmful forms of abortion bans.” In other words, any legal protection for the unborn child at any stage of development is declared an act of oppression. The joint statement from the NAF and Physicians for Reproductive Health continues: “When laws regulating abortion care include arbitrary legal limits, politicians and police are invited into exam rooms, advancing control over pregnant people — forcing them to stay pregnant and finding ways to punish them when they don’t.”
Here the unborn child is rendered entirely invisible — reduced to a rhetorical device of “control over pregnant people.” The child in the womb is not a patient, not a human being with an immortal soul, not a person created in the image and likeness of God (*imago Dei*). The child is, in this demonic framework, nothing more than a threat to the absolute autonomy of the mother — an autonomy that, in practice, means the unrestricted right to kill.
The article reports that the NAF’s policy “supports abortion care and access throughout pregnancy and opposes legislation and policies that interfere with that care, including viability limits and gestation-based bans.” This is the demand for the legal right to commit homicide at any stage of pregnancy, including the deliberate killing of a fully viable infant capable of surviving outside the womb — an act that, in any civilized legal tradition informed by natural law, would be classified as murder.
The Conciliar Sect’s Complicity Through Silence and Ambiguity
While the article dutifully reports the condemnations issued by pro-life organizations, it fails to expose the fundamental complicity of the post-conciliar structures in the very existence of this regime. The conciliar sect has, for over half a century, professed a ambiguous “pro-life” rhetoric while systematically undermining the dogmatic foundations upon which any coherent defense of life must rest.
The integral Catholic position is unambiguous. The Church has taught infallibly, from the earliest centuries, that human life is sacred from the moment of conception and that direct abortion at any stage is a mortal sin deserving of automatic excommunication. Canon 1398 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law — itself a product of the conciliar revolution — retained this penalty, yet the structures occupying the Vatican have done virtually nothing to enforce it against Catholic politicians and “Catholics” who publicly advocate for and fund abortion. The conciliar sect’s own “Catholic” politicians — including figures like the former Speaker of the House — have been routinely receiving “Communion” in the new mass for decades while publicly defending and voting for the murder of the unborn, without any public canonical penalty from the conciliar authorities.
Pope Leo XIV, the current usurper on Peter’s throne, is reported in a related article as warning that “no doctor should ever ‘decide'” — a statement that, while superficially sounding pro-life, is entirely compatible with the conciarist strategy of rhetorical ambiguity. The integral Catholic position is clear: the doctor has no authority to kill, period. The Church teaches that both mother and child are patients, and that every effort must be made to save both lives. As Dr. Christina Francis, head of the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, correctly stated in the article: “If a mother is facing a serious pregnancy complication, she can be delivered, and both patients can receive the care they need and deserve.” This is the authentic Catholic medical ethic — one that the conciliar sect has done almost nothing to promote, precisely because doing so would require confronting the modernist dissolution of moral absolutes that the entire post-conciliar revolution is built upon.
The Dobbs Decision: A Half-Measure in a War Already Lost
The article frames the Dobbs decision as a victory for the pro-life movement. And indeed, the overturning of Roe v. Wade was a necessary but entirely insufficient step. The NAF’s response demonstrates precisely why: the underlying philosophy of “reproductive autonomy” — the idea that a human being has the absolute right to decide whether another human being lives or dies — was never addressed by the Dobbs ruling. The decision merely returned the question to the states, leaving the fundamental moral error intact.
Pritchard of SBA Pro-Life America observed: “The U.S. is 1 of 8 countries in the world that allows all-trimester abortion and we’re on that list with Communist China and Vietnam. Fifteen states allow abortion at any point, including in the seventh, eighth and ninth months of pregnancy.” She further noted: “Several abortion businesses openly advertise third-trimester abortions, including ones in Colorado, Maryland, and Illinois. This isn’t just hypothetical: second and third trimester abortions are happening in the blue states. Babies who can feel pain and survive outside of the womb are being killed.”
The reference to Communist China and Vietnam is telling. The integral Catholic position recognizes that both capitalism and communism, when divorced from the Law of Christ, produce the same fruit: the slaughter of the innocent. China’s one-child policy, enforced through forced abortion, was a product of communist materialism. The United States’ “reproductive rights” regime is the product of liberal individualism. Both are expressions of the same rebellion against God’s absolute sovereignty over life and death.
Pius XI, in his encyclical *Quas Primas* (1925), taught with prophetic clarity: “When God and Jesus Christ — as we lamented — were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed, because the main reason why some have the right to command and others have the duty to obey was removed. For this reason, the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” The abortion regime is the direct and inevitable consequence of this removal of Christ the King from the laws and constitutions of nations.
The Syllabus of Errors and the Modern Apostasy
Pope Pius IX, in the *Syllabus of Errors* (1864), condemned proposition number 77: “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship.” And proposition number 80: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.”
These condemnations are directly pertinent to the current situation. The entire legal framework that permits abortion — and that the NAF now demands be expanded to include abortion until birth — is the fruit of the liberal secularism that Pius IX condemned. The “progress” with which the conciliar sect has attempted to “reconcile” itself is precisely this: the formal acceptance of the autonomy of the human will from the Law of God, dressed up in the language of “rights,” “freedom,” and “compassion.”
St. Pius X, in *Lamentabili Sane Exitu* (1907), condemned the modernist proposition that “The Church is an enemy of the progress of natural and theological sciences” (proposition 57) and that “Contemporary Catholicism cannot be reconciled with true knowledge without transforming it into a certain dogmaless Christianity, that is, into a broad and liberal Protestantism” (proposition 65). The conciliar sect’s approach to the abortion question is a living illustration of this condemnation: rather than confronting the world with the unchanging truth of the absolute sanctity of human life from conception, the post-conciliar structures have sought to find “common ground” with the culture of death, accepting its fundamental premises while merely arguing about its “limits.”
The Only True Solution: The Social Reign of Christ the King
The pro-life leaders quoted in the article call for legislative action, for a “national minimum standard” to protect unborn children. These efforts, while praiseworthy in their intention, are ultimately insufficient because they address the symptom rather than the disease. The disease is the apostasy of nations — the formal rejection of the Social Kingship of Christ over all civil society.
Pius XI declared in *Quas Primas*: “The Kingdom of our Redeemer encompasses all men… And it matters not whether individuals, families, or states, for men united in societies are no less subject to the authority of Christ than individuals.” He further taught: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ, but let them fulfill this duty themselves and with their people, if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate and contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness.”
There will be no lasting legal protection for the unborn until the nations publicly profess the Kingship of Christ Jesus and submit their laws to the governance of His Church. Every attempt to restrict abortion while maintaining the secularist framework of “religious freedom” and “separation of Church and State” is, at best, a temporary and fragile compromise. The NAF’s demand for abortion until birth is simply the logical terminus of the secularist principle: if the State does not acknowledge God, then the State cannot affirm the sanctity of human life, and the strongest will prevail.
The integral Catholic position demands not merely restrictions on abortion, but the full restoration of the Social Reign of Christ the King — the recognition by every nation that the moral law, as taught by the Catholic Church, is the foundation of all just legislation. Until this is accomplished, the blood of the innocent will continue to cry out to Heaven for justice (*Genesis 4:10*), and the conciliar sect will continue to offer its meaningless platitudes while the abomination of desolation advances unabated.
Lex iniusta non est lex — an unjust law is no law at all (St. Augustine, De Libero Arbitrio). The so-called “right” to abortion is not a right but a crime, and no human authority can legitimize it.
Source:
Major abortion group calls for abortion until birth (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 27.06.2026