The EWTN portal reports that the United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear a lawsuit brought by a Jewish resident, Daniel Grand, against the city of University Heights, Ohio, after the municipality prohibited him from hosting a minyan (prayer quorum) in his home without a special-use permit. The “U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops” (USCCB) filed an amicus brief supporting Grand, arguing that “religious plaintiffs have standing to sue as soon as a credible threat arises” and that procedural “finality” rules constitute a “constitutional harm.” The plaintiff is represented by the Protestant legal group Alliance Defending Freedom. This collaboration between the conciliar hierarchy, Protestant activists, and a Jewish petitioner before a secular tribunal perfectly crystallizes the apostasy of the post-conciliar sect: the defense of false worship under the Masonic banner of “religious liberty.”
The Theological Abomination of Defending False Worship as a “Right”
The central crime of this episode is not a municipal zoning dispute, but the formal cooperation of the conciliar “bishops” in the propagation of the Synagogue of Satan. By backing a Jewish prayer group, the USCCB explicitly affirms the condemned heresy of indifferentism — the doctrine that “man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation” (Pius IX, Syllabus Errorum, Prop. 16). Pope Pius XI, in Quas Primas, teaches that “the state must leave… the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him… for it will remind them of the final judgment, in which Christ… will very severely avenge these insults, because His royal dignity demands that all relations in the state be ordered on the basis of God’s commandments”. The “bishops” have inverted this duty: they petition Caesar to protect the enemies of Christ the King.
The article notes the USCCB argued that delaying judicial review due to “finality” rules serves as a “constitutional harm.” This language reveals the total substitution of the supernatural order by the naturalist legal order. The only true harm is the offense against the Divine Majesty committed by public non-Catholic worship and the scandal of “Catholic” prelates endorsing it. As St. Pius X condemned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 58), “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him” — the modernist error that truth is subject to procedural due process rather than the immutable Will of God.
The Linguistic Mask: “Religious Liberty” as a Weapon Against the Social Kingship of Christ
The rhetoric deployed by the “senior attorney” of Alliance Defending Freedom, John Bursch — “Every American has the right to host a prayer gathering in his home, and he certainly doesn’t need a city permit to do so” — is pure Lockean liberalism. It treats the ius publicum of the Church (the right to public corporate worship) as a private “civil liberty” derived from the state, not from God. The “bishops” in their brief adopt the identical vocabulary: “Religious plaintiffs have standing to sue as soon as a credible threat arises.” They speak the language of the Civitas Terrena, not the Civitas Dei. There is zero reference to the Regnum Christi, the Corpus Mysticum, or the salvation of souls. The silence on the necessity of the Catholic Faith for salvation (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus) is the loudest condemnation of their apostasy.
Factual Deconstruction: The “Catholic” Backing of a Protestant Legal Strategy for a Jewish Rite
Factually, the article describes a tripartite alliance: a Jewish plaintiff (Grand), a Protestant legal firm (ADF), and the “Catholic” episcopal conference (USCCB). This is the œcumenism of the trenches condemned by Pius XI in Mortalium Animos (1928): “The Apostolic See cannot take part in their assemblies, nor is it anyway lawful for Catholics either to support or to work for such enterprises; for if they do so they will be giving countenance to a false Christianity, quite alien to the one Church of Christ.” The USCCB, by filing an amicus brief, gives juridical countenance to the proposition that the Talmudic prayer (minyan) possesses a “right” to exist immune from state regulation — a right which, in Catholic doctrine, belongs exclusively to the True Religion. The “finality” rule is a red herring; the real issue is the usurpation of Christ’s Kingship by the secular state, cheered on by the very men ordained to defend it.
Symptomatic Level: The Conciliar Sect as an NGO for Masonic “Human Rights”
This case is a textbook illustration of the conciliar sect’s function as the religious wing of the Masonic New World Order. The “bishops” do not act as successors of the Apostles teaching “all nations… whatsoever I have commanded you” (Matt. 28:20), but as lobbyists for “religious freedom” — the libertas perditionis condemned by Gregory XVI (Mirari Vos) and Pius IX (Quanta Cura). The involvement of EWTN (the “Eternal Word Television Network”) as the reporter normalizes this betrayal, presenting the defense of Judaism as a “Catholic” news item. The “Supreme Court” — a tribunal of a Masonic republic founded on the separation of Church and State — is appealed to as the final arbiter of “rights.” This is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt. 24:15): the hierarchy of the counter-church using the machinery of the Antichrist to legitimize false worship.
The Invalidity of the “Bishops” and Their Acts
It must be reiterated that the signatories of the USCCB brief are not true bishops. Since the illicit introduction of the new rite of episcopal consecration (1968) and the manifest heresy of the conciliar “popes” (John XXIII through Leo XIV/Prevost), the “bishops” lack both valid orders and jurisdiction. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches (De Romano Pontifice, cited in the Defense of Sedevacantism file), “A manifest heretic… by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head… a non-Christian in no way can be Pope… a manifest heretic cannot be Pope.” Those who adhere to the “pope” (Leo XIV) and the Vatican II sect are outside the Church. Their “amicus brief” has no more canonical weight than a petition from the Rotary Club. It is an act of public apostasy, confirming the sedevacantist thesis that the See of Peter is vacant and the structures in Rome are a paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican.
Conclusion: No “Liberty” Apart from the Truth
The Supreme Court’s decision to hear this case changes nothing. Whether the “finality” rule is struck down or upheld, the Social Reign of Christ the King remains denied. The “victory” sought by the USCCB and ADF is a victory for indifferentism, ensuring that the enemies of Christ may organize publicly under the protection of the secular arm. True Catholics — those adhering to the integral Faith of Tradition, the Mass of All Time, and the vacant See — recognize this spectacle for what it is: the whore of Babylon riding the beast (Apoc. 17:3), the counter-church servicing the Masonic state. “Non est aliud nomen sub caelo datum hominibus, in quo oporteat nos salvari” (Acts 4:12). There is no religious liberty for error; there is only the liberty of the children of God in the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.
Source:
Supreme Court will hear Catholic-backed Jewish religious liberty suit involving ‘finality’ rule (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 01.07.2026