Synodality’s Blasphemous Assault on Divine Hierarchy
The Catholic News Agency portal (November 19, 2025) reports on the latest developments in the Synod on Synodality, revealing continued modernist subversion of Holy Orders and sacramental theology. The article describes how the “study groups” – established by antipope Leo XIV – deliberately exclude examination of the female diaconate while advancing other revolutionary agendas: intercommunion with heretics, liturgical deformation, and ecumenical syncretism. This secta antipapalis (antipapal sect) demonstrates its irreformable rupture with Catholic Tradition by transferring the female diaconate question to a revived “commission” while prioritizing the destruction of sacramental integrity through “Eucharistic hospitality” and “inculturation of rites.”
Subversion of Holy Orders and Divine Law
The report admits that the “highly-watched study group on Church ministries” has abandoned discussion of female diaconate – not out of fidelity to doctrine, but as strategic retreat. By delegating this heresy to a revived 2020 commission, the conciliar sect employs doctrinae toxicam dilatio (toxic doctrine delay) – maintaining revolutionary potential while feigning prudence. The attempt to “study the participation of women in… leadership” directly contradicts Pope Pius XII’s definitive teaching: “The Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women” (Sacramentum Ordinis, 1947).
The silence on female deacons is tactical, not doctrinal. As Pope Leo XIII warned: “When once the idea of the authority of the Apostolic See is set aside… the Catholic religion would cease to be what it is” (Satis Cognitum, 1896). This commission structure violates Pastor Aeternus by creating parallel “teaching” bodies divorced from apostolic mandate. The 2020 commission’s member James Keating admits the group exists “until Pope Leo discerns its dissolution” – demonstrating the arbitrary, anti-dogmatic nature of conciliar governance.
Sacrilegious “Eucharistic Hospitality” and Ecumenical Apostasy
The study group on “ecumenical practices” openly promotes intercommunion – termed “Eucharistic hospitality.” This constitutes formal cooperation with heresy, condemned by Pope Pius XII: “They destroy the unity of the Catholic Church… They cannot be living members of the Church nor can they enjoy eternal salvation” (Mystici Corporis Christi, 1943). The article’s claim that this is “especially relevant in couples… of both Catholic and non-Catholic faiths” exposes naturalistic reduction of the Eucharist to human sentiment – precisely the error condemned in proposition 58 of Pius IX’s Syllabus: placing “rectitude of morality” in “gratification of pleasure.”
The report’s description of homosexuality as an “emerging issue” rather than “controversial” confirms the synod’s capitulation to moral relativism. Pope St. Pius X demolished such sophistry: “Modernists… recognize that the three first degrees of the scale have to do with history… the fourth alone is concerned with religion” (Lamentabili, 22). By rebranding sin as “emerging issue,” the conciliar sect enacts proposition 64 of the same decree: requiring “reform of Christian doctrine” to suit modern errors.
Liturgical Desecration Through “Synodal” Deformation
The liturgy study group’s agenda reveals full-scale assault on the Mass as propitiatory sacrifice. Their intention to make liturgy “better configured as the source and summit of the synodal missionary life” inverts the divine hierarchy – subordinating the opus Dei (work of God) to human activity. Pope Pius XII condemned such anthropocentrism: “The worship rendered by the Church to God must be… in its inmost nature… the full and perfect worship of the Lord” (Mediator Dei, 1947).
The call for “healthy decentralization of liturgical authority” directly violates Quo Primum (1570), which established perpetual validity of the Traditional Mass, and Pope St. Pius V’s warning: “Let all everywhere adopt and observe what has been handed down by the Holy Roman Church.” The silence on Traditional Latin Mass restrictions proves the conciliar sect’s hatred for true Catholic worship – confirming Benedict XV’s warning in Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum (1914) against “novelties” bringing “contempt for authority.”
Theological Omissions Exposing Modernist Heresy
The article’s omissions prove more damning than its admissions:
- No mention of Mary’s singular mediation: The “role of women in salvation history” discussion deliberately omits the Immaculate Conception and Our Lady’s coredemptrix role – condemned by St. Pius X as Modernist reduction of dogma to “religious experience” (Pascendi, 19).
- Silence on sacramental validity: The intercommunion proposal ignores Pope Leo XIII’s condemnation of Anglican orders as “absolutely null and utterly void” (Apostolicae Curae, 1896).
- Omission of final ends: No reference to judgment, hell, or necessity of conversion – violating Pope Benedict XV’s warning against “false irenicism” (Ad Beatissimi, 14).
The linguistic analysis proves systematic apostasy:
- “Paradigm shift”: Echoes proposition 22 of Lamentabili that dogmas are “interpretations of religious facts” rather than divine truths.
- “Resistance”: Dismisses faithful Catholics as emotionally/psychologically defective – mirroring Communist tactics against dissidents.
- “Eucharistic hospitality”: Blasphemous neologism masking sacrilege against the Real Presence.
The Conciliar Sect as Formal Schism
These developments confirm the post-conciliar structure’s complete rupture with Catholicism. As Pope Pius XI declared: “The Church is a perfect society… demanding full freedom and independence” (Quas Primas, 1925). The synod’s rejection of this independence – subordinating doctrine to “conversation in the Spirit” – enacts proposition 55 of Syllabus: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.”
The true Church continues only among those holding fast to semper idem (always the same) doctrine, rejecting all conciliar innovations. As Pope St. Pius X warned: “The Modernist as reformer cannot but be eager to see the triumph of the Church… But in reality, they are working for her ruin” (Pascendi, 38). This synod proves the conciliar sect’s definitive apostasy – not a branch of Catholicism, but a Masonic-inspired counter-church paving the Antichrist’s path.
Source:
Synod on Synodality reports reveal continued study on women, but not female diaconate (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 19.11.2025