The EWTN News portal (ACI Prensa) reports that the “apostolic nuncio” to Great Britain, Archbishop Miguel Maury Buendía, has declared a visit by the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) to England “likely, desirable, and… unavoidable,” framing it as a reciprocal diplomatic gesture following King Charles III’s state visit to the Vatican and a mission to “awaken the conscience of the West” in a “secularized society” experiencing an alleged “quiet Christian revival.” This theatrical diplomatic maneuver confirms the conciliar sect’s total capitulation to the religion of humanity, reducing the Papacy to a mere geopolitical NGO servicing the Masonic project of a one-world religion under the guise of “human rights” and “dialogue.”
The “Nuncio” as Agent of the Paramasonic Structure: Diplomatic Theater Replacing the Kingship of Christ
The cited article presents the “nuncio” Maury Buendía not as a legate of Christ the King, but as a functionary of a sovereign entity—the “Vatican City State”—whose “very purpose… is different from that of other states,” existing merely “to guarantee the pope’s independence” so he may “proclaim the Gospel.” This definition strips the Papacy of its divine constitution. As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas, Christ received from the Father “power and honor and a kingdom” (Dan. VII, 13-14) not as a private spiritual guru, but as Man, to reign over all nations and all human societies. The “nuncio” explicitly denies this social reign: “The Holy See has no oranges to sell and no oil to buy.” This reduction of the Apostolic See to a purely spiritual NGO, devoid of temporal sovereignty and the duty to command nations to submit to Christ’s laws, is the practical application of the condemned proposition “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Syllabus, Error 55). The “diplomacy” described—prioritizing “the spiritual dimension of the human person” and “human rights”—is the laicism condemned by Pius XI as the “plague that poisons human society,” the very error the Feast of Christ the King was instituted to combat.
Reciprocity with the Anglican Schism: The “Visit” as Consummation of False Ecumenism
The “nuncio” justifies the projected visit by the logic of diplomatic reciprocity: “King Charles III paid a state visit to the Vatican last year, and it is logical that the United Kingdom would now invite Pope Leo XIV to return the visit.” This reveals the satanic inversion at the heart of the conciliar sect. King Charles III is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England, the head of a schismatic and heretical establishment born of adultery and regicide, which denies the Papacy, the Mass, and the Sacraments. For the Vicar of Christ—or the one claiming to be such—to pay a “return visit” to the headquarters of the Anglican Revolt is not “pastoral”; it is the public recognition of a false religion as a legitimate “lung” of the Church. The “nuncio” explicitly invokes the John Paul II metaphor: “the pontificate of Leo XIV is called to awaken the conscience of the West just as that of St. John Paul II once stirred the conscience of the East, so that the Church may once again breathe fully with both of its lungs.” This “two lungs” ecclesiology is a heretical denial of the unity of the Church (Unam Sanctam), treating schism and heresy as complementary expressions of the one Body of Christ. Pius IX condemned the proposition: “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Syllabus, Error 18). This visit would be the liturgical ratification of that error.
The Vacant See: Robert Prevost (“Leo XIV”) as Manifest Heretic Ipso Facto Deposed
The entire premise of the article rests on the falsehood that Robert Prevost is the Roman Pontiff. From the perspective of integral Catholic theology, the line of usurpers beginning with John XXIII (Angelo Roncalli) has occupied the Vatican structures through a manifest heresy that automatically severs them from the Church and the Petrine Office. St. Robert Bellarmine, cited in the Defense of Sedevacantism, teaches definitively: “A Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head… by which things he may be judged and punished by the Church.” Wernz and Vidal confirm: “By notorious and publicly manifested heresy, the Roman Pontiff… is deprived ipso facto of his personal jurisdiction even before any declaratory sentence by the Church.”
The “pope” in question, Prevost, is a public adherent of the Second Vatican Council, which teaches Dignitatis Humanae (religious liberty), Nostra Aetate (false ecumenism), and Lumen Gentium (collegiality/subjection of the Church to the world)—doctrines explicitly condemned by the Syllabus of Pius IX (Quanta Cura) and St. Pius X (Pascendi, Lamentabili Sane Exitu). By Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration… if the cleric… 4. Publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” As Fr. McDevitt notes, “joining… a non-Catholic sect is not required to establish the publicity which the canon demands”; formal heresy suffices. Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio declares the promotion of a heretic “null, void, and of no effect” regardless of “unanimous assent of all the Cardinals.” Therefore, “Leo XIV” holds no authority; his “nuncio” holds no mandate; his “visit” is the travel of a private individual, a layman usurping the Chair of Peter.
Naturalistic “Revival” and the Silence on Supernatural Truth
The “nuncio” speaks of a “spiritual vacuum… giving way to a quiet Christian revival among younger generations,” citing “religious practice… increasing among Catholics, thanks in part to the thousands of immigrants and children of immigrants who are revitalizing parish life.” This is pure sociologism. There is zero mention of the state of grace, the Sacraments, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, Conversion, or the Final Judgment. The “faith” described is an ethnic or cultural demographic statistic, not the virtus infusa by which man assents to Divine Revelation. This mirrors the Modernist error condemned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 26): “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief.” The “nuncio” boasts of bringing the “pope’s blessing” to “remote places” in Kazakhstan, yet admits the “Muslim majority and millions of Russian Orthodox believers abandoned their faith,” while the “Catholic minority preserved it… thanks to the daily family rosary.” This naturalistic focus on the rosary as a cultural talisman rather than the Sacrifice of the Mass and the Priesthood is the hallmark of the false Fatima narrative (exposed in the False Fatima Apparitions file as a “Masonic psychological operation” diverting from the Mass and the Church’s centralized role). The “diplomacy” of the conciliar sect is Pelagian activism divorced from the supernatural order.
The “Conscience of the West” vs. The Social Kingship of Christ
The “nuncio” claims the pontificate is called to “awaken the conscience of the West.” This language is Masonic. The West does not need its “conscience awakened” by a false pope; it needs its laws conformed to the Kingship of Christ. Pius XI in Quas Primas is unequivocal: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The “nuncio” speaks of “human rights” and “secularized society” as the framework. The Syllabus condemns the proposition: “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41) and “In the case of conflicting laws enacted by the two powers, the civil law prevails” (Error 42). By seeking a state visit from King Charles III, the usurper Prevost implicitly accepts the supremacy of the British Crown over the temporal order and the legitimacy of the Anglican Establishment. He goes not as Rex Regum demanding the submission of the State to Christ, but as a petitioner for “dialogue” and “revival” within the Masonic framework of liberté, égalité, fraternité.
Symptomatic Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation in Diplomatic Vestments
This projected visit is not an anomaly; it is the essential nature of the post-conciliar sect. Since 1958, the usurpers have systematically dismantled the social reign of Christ the King (the very purpose of the Feast instituted by Pius XI in 1925) and replaced it with a “diplomacy of human rights” servicing the New World Order. The “nuncio” Maury Buendía, a career diplomat of 39 years in the service of Roncalli, Montini, Luciani, Wojtyła, Ratzinger, Bergoglio, and now Prevost, embodies the continuity of the rupture. His book “Faith, Life, Diplomacy” is the manifesto of a Church that has ceased to be the Ark of Salvation and become a Department of State for the Religion of Man. The faithful Catholic, adhering to the integral faith and the Sedevacantist necessity dictated by Bellarmine, Canon 188.4, and Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, must recognize this “visit” for what it is: a spectacle of the Great Apostasy, the “abomination of desolation standing in the holy place” (Matt. 24:15), seeking photo-ops with the King of a schismatic realm while the True Mass and True Doctrine are exiled to the catacombs. Non praevalebunt.
Source:
Papal nuncio to Great Britain: A visit from Pope Leo is ‘likely’ (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 13.07.2026