The Vatican News portal (July 16, 2026) reports that the French National Assembly definitively adopted legislation establishing a “legal right to assisted dying” on July 15, 2026, after four years of debate. The “French Bishops’ Conference” expresses “regret” and “deep concern,” while its spokesman, “Bishop” Mathieu Rougé of Nanterre, laments the absence of an “institutional conscience clause” to protect Catholic hospitals from being forced to host euthanasia. The hierarchy’s response consists of pursuing “legal appeals,” advocating “active fraternity” and “concrete commitment” to the suffering, and awaiting a visit from antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) in two months, hoping he will “speak clearly.” This surrender reveals the complete bankruptcy of the conciliar hierarchy: they negotiate with the Masonic state for crumbs of religious liberty while abandoning the social reign of Christ the King and the immutable divine law that Thou shalt not kill.
The Masonic State Legislates Murder; the Conciliar Hierarchy Begs for Exemptions
The French Republic, a direct fruit of the 1789 Masonic revolution, has now codified the “right” to kill the innocent—the sick, the elderly, the disabled. This is the logical terminus of the error condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (1864): “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” (Error 39) and “In the case of conflicting laws enacted by the two powers, the civil law prevails” (Error 42). The “bishops” do not denounce this usurpation of God’s sovereignty over life and death; they merely request an “institutional conscience clause”—a legal carve-out for their institutions. “Institutions whose ethical charter or religious identity rejects the practice of euthanasia will nevertheless be required to allow it to take place within their facilities” complains “Bishop” Rougé. He appeals to “government assurances” that “have not been fulfilled.” This is the language of a supplicant NGO, not the voice of the Ecclesia docens entrusted with the potestas regiminis over souls. Where is the anathema against the Catholic legislators who voted for this abomination? Where is the declaration that no Catholic may cooperate formally or materially in this crime without incurring latae sententiae excommunication? Silence. The hierarchy has accepted the separation of Church and State condemned by the Syllabus (Error 55) and now reaps the whirlwind.
“Active Fraternity” Replaces the Kingship of Christ and the Salvation of Souls
The “Bishops’ Conference” statement explicitly rejects a merely “moral condemnation” in favor of “active fraternity—practical acts of compassion and solidarity” as the Christian response. “Our response is not merely a matter of expressing moral principles. Fundamentally, it is a matter of fraternal commitment” declares “Bishop” Rougé. This is the heresy of horizontalism, the reduction of the Gospel to humanitarian philanthropy, condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu (1907): “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (Error 26) and “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement, applied or applicable to different times and places” (Error 59). The “bishop” says: “Regardless of what the law says—for the law is only the law—we hope that Christians in France will become ever more committed to living out genuine fraternity”. This is a practical denial of the Social Kingship of Christ taught by Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925): “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation”. The “law is only the law” is the voice of legal positivism, the lex injusta non est lex rejected by Catholic tradition. The true shepherd would cry Non possumus to the state legalizing murder, not organize soup kitchens to mitigate its effects.
The Antipope Leo XIV: False Prophet for an Apostate Hierarchy
“Bishop” Rougé pins hope on the upcoming visit of “Pope Leo XIV” (Robert Prevost), citing a document Magnifica humanitas (likely a fabrication of the anti-church) and the 2020 CDF letter Samaritanus bonus. He claims the antipope “has spoken very forcefully… both in Rome and in Spain” and “will speak clearly.” This is the blind leading the blind. According to the principles of Catholic theology defended by St. Robert Bellarmine and canonized in the Defense of Sedevacantism source, “A Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head… just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church”. The line of usurpers since John XXIII has consistently taught heresy: religious liberty, false ecumenism, collegiality, and now the acceptance of the “right to die” via their silence and dialogue with the world. A manifest heretic cannot be the head of the Church because “he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member; now, he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian… therefore, a manifest heretic cannot be Pope” (Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice). The French “bishops,” by recognizing this antipope as their father and head, demonstrate their own schism from the Catholic Church. They are not successors of the Apostles but functionaries of the “paramasonic structure” occupying the Vatican.
No “Institutional Conscience” Without the Rights of God
The demand for an “institutional conscience clause” for the Little Sisters of the Poor and other congregations is a tacit admission that the Church’s freedom derives from the permission of the secular state, not from her Divine Founder. Pius XI taught in Quas Primas: “The Church, established by Christ as a perfect society, demands for itself by a right belonging to it, which it cannot renounce, full freedom and independence from secular authority”. The Syllabus condemns the error that “The Church is not a true and perfect society, entirely free… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church” (Error 19). By begging the Masonic legislature for an exemption, the “bishops” legitimize the state’s claim to total jurisdiction over healthcare, including the power to define what constitutes “care” (now including killing). They have forgotten Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration by reason of tacit resignation… if the cleric: … 4. Publicly defects from the Catholic faith”. A bishop who fails to defend the divine law against state-sanctioned murder, who replaces the regnum Christi with “fraternity,” has tacitly resigned his office.
The Ultimate Fruit of Vatican II: Apostasy Disguised as Pastoral Care
This entire spectacle—the four-year “debate,” the “participation in discussions,” the “legal avenues,” the reliance on an antipope—is the rotten fruit of the Second Vatican Council. The Council’s Dignitatis Humanae declared the state has no longer have a duty to profess the true religion, effectively capitulating to Error 77 of the Syllabus: “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State”. The Council’s Gaudium et Spes opened the door to “dialogue” with the world, resulting in a hierarchy that speaks the language of the world (“autonomy,” “dignity,” “accompaniment”) while the world legislates death. The “bishop” speaks of “vulnerability,” “loneliness,” “isolation”—sociological categories—but never of mortal sin, eternal damnation, the Cross, or the necessity of the Sacraments for a happy death. This is the “cult of man” denounced by the pre-conciliar Magisterium. The “False Fatima Apparitions” document correctly identifies the strategy: “The message focuses on external threats (communism), omitting the main danger: modernist apostasy within the Church”. Today, the “bishops” focus on “legal appeals” while the apostasy within consumes the flock.
Conclusion: Return to the Integral Faith or Perish with the Neo-Church
The French “bishops” have shown their true colors: they are hirelings who flee when the wolf comes (John 10:12). They offer “fraternity” instead of the Kingship of Christ, “legal appeals” instead of anathema, hope in an antipope instead of fidelity to the Depositum Fidei. The only true response to a state that legalizes murder is the proclamation of the Social Reign of Christ the King, the excommunication of the guilty, and the refusal to cooperate in any form with the structures of death. The true Church—the Church of the catacombs, the Church of Tradition, the Church that holds the unchanging faith of Trent and Vatican I—alone possesses the authority to bind and loose. The conciliar sect occupying the visible structures in France and Rome is the abomination of desolation (Matt 24:15). Salus animarum suprema lex. Let the faithful flee the “institutional conscience” of the neo-church and seek the institutional reality of the true Church, where the Mass of All Times is offered and the divine law is proclaimed without compromise.
Source:
French Bishops voice concern over end-of-life law, weigh legal options (vaticannews.va)
Date: 16.07.2026