Antichurch

Antichurch

Pope Leo XIV Appoints U.S. “Catholics” to Neo-Church Development Office

The neo-church’s news service reports that the antipope known as “Pope Leo XIV” has appointed four U.S. “Catholics” to the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development, a Vatican office created by “Pope Francis” in 2016. The appointees include Dylan Corbett of the Hope Border Institute, Fr. Daniel Groody of the University of Notre Dame, Meghan Clark of St. John’s University, and Léocadie Wabo Lushombo of the Jesuit School of Theology. Their stated focus is on immigration, the “preferential option for the poor,” and “integral ecology,” framed within a “theology of migration” and liberation theology. The article presents these appointments as a sign of hope and a continuation of the “Gospel message” for the “crucified” of today. This is a complete repudiation of Catholic theology and a propagation of the Modernist, naturalistic religion condemned by the pre-conciliar Magisterium.

A traditional Catholic priest praying at a closed church door in Algeria, surrounded by armed authorities and modernist activists.
Antichurch

Before Pope Leo Lands in Algeria, Advocates Want the World to Know What Christians Face There

The cited article from the NC Register/CNA reports on a side event at the U.N. Human Rights Council held on March 18, 2026, where advocates described the legal and administrative repression of Christians in Algeria ahead of the expected April 13–15 visit of “Pope” Leo XIV. It highlights the 2020 constitution’s removal of explicit freedom of conscience, the criminalization of conversion from Islam, the closure of 47 Protestant churches and Caritas Algeria, and the geopolitical factors (energy, counterterrorism, arms sales) that shield Algeria from international accountability. The article frames the situation as a human rights issue, expresses hope that the papal visit might draw attention, and calls for Algeria to restore constitutional freedom of conscience and for the U.N. to send a special rapporteur.

Catholic counselor Kaley Chiles in a church sanctuary with a Bible, symbolizing the conflict between divine law and secular authority in the Supreme Court ruling on 'conversion therapy'.
Antichurch

Supreme Court Errs: Civil “Freedom” Trumps Divine Law on Homosexuality

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling on March 31, 2026, striking down Colorado’s ban on so-called “conversion therapy” for minors, holding that the ban violates the First Amendment’s free speech protections. The case, brought by Christian counselor Kaley Chiles, argued that the state’s prohibition on therapy aimed at changing “sexual orientation or gender identity” constituted unlawful viewpoint discrimination, as it permitted supportive therapy for gender transitions but prohibited faith-based counseling aligned with the counselor’s religious beliefs. The Court agreed, calling the law an “egregious assault” on free speech. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, arguing that medical regulations have “far less salience” for First Amendment scrutiny. This ruling represents a definitive triumph of secular, naturalistic human rights over the immutable moral law of God and the salvific mission of the Catholic Church.

Antichurch

The Conciliar Sect’s Historical Revisionism in the Philippines

The cited article from Vatican News reports on the celebration of the 505th anniversary of the first Easter Mass in the Philippines, led by “Bishop” Precioso Cantillas of the Diocese of Maasin. It frames the event as a milestone of “Christianity” in the archipelago, emphasizing themes of “mercy,” “mission,” “evangelization,” and “perseverance.” The article presents the celebration as a continuation of a five-century-long Catholic legacy, with the “bishop” calling families to recognize their “mission” and citing the example of “Saint” Lorenzo Ruiz. A superficial reading might see this as a routine historical commemoration. A deeper analysis, however, reveals a calculated act of theological and historical revisionism by the conciliar sect. The event is not a celebration of Catholicity but a solemn ratification of the post-Vatican II apostasy, a naturalistic parody of true evangelization, and a brazen denial of the catastrophic rupture that defines the modern era. The article’s omissions are as damning as its assertions, creating a narrative that is theologically bankrupt and historically deceptive.

Scroll to Top
Antichurch.org
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.