Antichurch

The article from the National Catholic Register, dated March 13, 2026, reports on the launch of a biography of Cardinal Rafael Merry del Val by historian Roberto de Mattei. It presents the cardinal—serving as Secretary of State to St. Pius X—as a model of “humility, statesmanship and a profoundly supernatural approach to public life,” whose concept of Romanitas (Roman spirit) offers a solution to “excessive nationalism.” The event, held at the Brompton Oratory in London and attended by modernist “Cardinal” Vincent Nichols and other conciliar figures, frames Merry del Val’s life as a critique of national allegiances in favor of a universal Church mission “founded on the truth.” The biography highlights his role in Apostolicae Curae (1896) and Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907), his liturgical precision, and his spiritual humility, culminating in the claim that “we need more princes of the Church like Cardinal Rafael Merry del Val.”

This narrative, however, is a calculated distortion. It selectively extracts the pre-1958 cardinal’s legacy from its integral Catholic context and re-packages it as a tool for the post-conciliar sect’s ecumenical, naturalistic, and nationalist-agnostic agenda. The article’s thesis is that Merry del Val’s example challenges nationalisms, implying a concordat with the conciliar church’s own rejection of “particularism” in favor of a globalist, humanist “universalism.” This is a profound theological fraud. From the perspective of integral Catholic faith—which recognizes the immutability of doctrine and the catastrophic apostasy of the Vatican II revolution—the article exposes the Modernist strategy of canonizing pre-Conciliar figures while stripping their teachings of their anti-Modernist, integralist, and monarchical content to legitimize the very errors they fought.