Antipopes of the Antichurch
News feed
Vatican’s China Accord: Ecclesial Suicide in the Name of Dialogue
Vatican News portal (December 6, 2025) reports satisfaction with Chinese communist authorities’ “civil recognition” of Bishop Emeritus Joseph Zhang Weizhu, framing this as “a new and important step in the communal journey of ecclesiastical circumscription” following the ordination of Bishop Francis Li Jianlin. This celebration of state interference in episcopal governance exposes the conciliar sect’s wholesale capitulation to Marxist persecution.
Monastic Mercantilism Masquerading as Catholic Tradition
The National Catholic Register portal (December 6, 2025) promotes consumerism under the guise of supporting “Catholic monasteries,” listing 14 entities selling products ranging from bourbon-soaked fruitcakes to hand-painted chinaware. The article frames this commercial activity as sustaining “lives of prayer and service,” while carefully avoiding any substantive discussion of doctrinal fidelity or sacramental validity.
Conciliar Sect’s Advent Message Betrays Supernatural Hope for Man-Centered Activism
Vatican News portal (December 6, 2025) reports on a “Jubilee Audience” where antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) promotes Advent as a season of “active waiting” through “good actions” to “help bring the Kingdom of God closer.” The article quotes the antipope claiming: “God involves us in His story, in His dreams… To hope, then, is to participate,” while invoking Vatican II’s “signs of the times” concept and praising a Catholic Action member who died in political activism. The catechesis concludes with the blasphemous assertion that “No one saves the world alone. Not even God wants to save it alone: He could, but He does not want to, because together is better.”
The Modernist Distortion of St. Nicholas in Conciliar Propaganda
The VaticanNews portal (December 6, 2025) presents a saccharine portrayal of St. Nicholas that obscures Catholic doctrine beneath a veneer of ecumenism and historical reductionism. The article reduces the fourth-century bishop to a folkloric figure, emphasizing his “unifying” role with schismatic Orthodox communities while omitting his fierce defense of Catholic truth against Arian heretics at the Council of Nicaea. It celebrates the conciliar antipope’s visits to Bari’s basilica as legitimate acts of piety, ignoring the apostate nature of the post-conciliar hierarchy. This deliberate silence about Nicholas’ combat against heresy exemplifies the neo-church’s agenda to replace doctrinal clarity with sentimental fables.
Varia
Announcement:
– News feed –implemented
– Antipopes separate web sites with their all documents refutation – in progress