Catholic News Agency reports on November 11, 2025, that the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops elected Archbishop Paul Coakley as president and Bishop Daniel Flores as vice president during their Fall Plenary Assembly in Baltimore. The article portrays Coakley as defender of life issues through his opposition to abortion and gender ideology, while paradoxically criticizing border enforcement and supporting mass migration. Flores emerges as promoter of the Synod on Synodality and critic of immigration restrictions. This election exemplifies the conciliar sect’s perfected synthesis of naturalism and apostasy.
Naturalism Disguised as Moral Teaching
The article’s claim that Coakley “has a history of promoting a culture of life” constitutes theological fraud when measured against Quas Primas (1925), where Pius XI established that “the empire of our Redeemer embraces all men” through His social kingship. The USCCB’s reduction of pro-life work to political lobbying ignores the encyclical’s mandate that Christ must reign over all legislation, social order, and individual consciences. By treating abortion as merely a “preeminent priority” rather than the non possumus</i issue requiring absolute opposition, these pseudo-bishops engage in moral calculus condemned by Pius IX's Syllabus of Errors (1864), which rejected the notion that “the Church ought to be separated from the State” (Error 55).
Coakley’s statement that “the use of the death penalty only contributes to the continued coarsening of society” directly contradicts:
“The power of life and death is permitted to certain civil magistrates because theirs is the responsibility under law to punish the guilty and protect the innocent.” (St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica II-II, q. 64, a. 2)
This deviation reveals the conciliar sect’s abandonment of Thomistic principles in favor of sentimental humanitarianism.
Modernist Subversion Through Immigration Policy
The election of Flores – a promoter of the “Synod on Synodality” – as vice president confirms the USCCB’s total alignment with Bergoglio’s revolutionary agenda. His 2017 statement comparing immigration enforcement to “formal cooperation with intrinsic evil” constitutes blasphemy by equating divinely ordained civil authority with murder. Pius X’s Lamentabili Sane (1907) condemned such moral equivalence in Proposition 64: “Scientific progress demands that concepts of Christian doctrine…be recast.” When Flores urges “civil conversation” to resolve polarization, he employs the conciliar sect’s trademark strategy of replacing doctrinal clarity with perpetual dialogue – the exact error St. Pius X condemned as leading to “a dogmaless Christianity” (Proposition 65).
Coakley’s February 2025 statement that “illegal immigration is wrong” while simultaneously defending “our immigrant neighbors” follows the modernist both/and approach that neutralizes moral absolutes. His distinction between “violent criminals” and “upstanding members” entering illegally ignores the Church’s perennial teaching that bonum ex integra causa, malum ex quocumque defectu (good requires wholeness in all aspects, evil arises from any defect). By suggesting illegal border crossings can be morally neutral if done by “good people,” these pseudo-bishops reject the very concept of objective law Pius XII upheld in Summi Pontificatus (1939).
Structural Apostasy of the USCCB
The article’s uncritical reporting on these elections commits the grave omission of never questioning the USCCB’s canonical legitimacy. As the False Fatima Apparitions document exposes regarding modernist operations, the USCCB functions as a Masonic-style parallel hierarchy advancing the “ecumenism project” through bureaucratic processes. Their three-year presidential terms imitate democratic governance contrary to Christ’s monarchical constitution of the Church. The very notion of bishops “electing” leaders through secret ballots constitutes rebellion against Pastor Aeternus (1870), which affirms the Pope’s “full and supreme power of jurisdiction over the whole Church.”
These pseudo-bishops’ academic credentials – Coakley’s licentiate and Flores’ doctorate – cannot conceal their theological incompetence. St. Pius X’s Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907) warned that modernist clergy use advanced degrees to “furnish believers with something to quiet their consciences” while subverting doctrine. When the article praises Coakley’s “advice to parents” on gender ideology without demanding excommunication of transgender activists, it reveals the conciliar sect’s refusal to wield the Church’s punitive authority as mandated by Codex Iuris Canonici (1917) Canon 2314 against heresy.
Omission of Supernatural Finalities
Nowhere does the article mention the eternal consequences of the USCCB’s policies. Their silence on the Four Last Things (death, judgment, heaven, hell) proves they’ve abandoned the Church’s munus docendi (teaching office). While Coakley speaks of building a “culture of life,” he never warns that receiving communion in invalid Novus Ordo services constitutes sacrilege (Council of Trent, Session XIII, Canon 11). Flores’ synodal processes deliberately avoid teaching that extra Ecclesiam nulla salus (no salvation outside the Church) – the dogma defined in Unam Sanctam (1302) and repeatedly affirmed up to Pius XII’s Mystici Corporis (1943).
The article’s focus on political issues like immigration and capital punishment while ignoring the sacrileges committed daily in conciliar “Mass” celebrations demonstrates the sect’s complete secularization. As Pius XI declared in Quas Primas:
“When once men recognize, both in private and in public life, that Christ is King, society will at last receive the great blessings of real liberty, well-ordered discipline, peace and harmony.”
By making the USCCB a lobbying group rather than herald of Christ the King, these pseudo-bishops fulfill the Masonic plan to reduce Catholicism to a humanitarian NGO.
Source:
BREAKING: U.S. bishops elect Archbishop Paul S. Coakley as USCCB president (catholicnewsagency.com)
Date: 11.11.2025