VaticanNews portal reports on the third day of the apostolic journey of the usurper Robert Prevost, known as “Pope” Leo XIV, during his visit to Algeria and Cameroon on April 15, 2026. The article describes his travels, meetings with civil authorities, a visit to an orphanage, and a private meeting with the “Bishops” of Cameroon. The tone is overwhelmingly positive, focusing on “dialogue,” “peace,” and “women’s rights.” The cited article relates a series of public relations events orchestrated by the conciliar sect to project an image of global relevance and moral authority, while completely omitting the supernatural mission of the Church and the absolute necessity of the Social Reign of Christ the King.
The “Holy Father” and the Cult of Personality
The article opens with a description of the farewell ceremony in Algiers, where the usurper Leo XIV refers to his stay in “Saint Augustine’s homeland” as a “special blessing.” This casual appropriation of the Church Fathers by a manifest heretic is a hallmark of the conciliar sect’s strategy to maintain a veneer of legitimacy. St. Augustine, who wrote extensively on the City of God and the necessity of true peace found only in Christ, would be horrified to see his legacy invoked to legitimize a “pope” who promotes the very errors condemned by the pre-conciliar Magisterium. The article notes that the “Holy Father” expressed gratitude for the “wonderful opportunity to continue to build bridges and promote dialogue.” This phraseology is not accidental; it is the standard lexicon of the post-conciliar apostasy, replacing the Church’s mission of conversion and salvation with a naturalistic agenda of social cohesion and interfaith syncretism.
The arrival in Yaoundé is described with typical hagiographic fervor: “Large crowds of people waited for him at the airport, waving Vatican and Cameroonian flags and shouting words of welcome in English and French – and even the occasional ‘Buonasera’ in Italian could be heard.” This spectacle of mass adulation, complete with flags and choreographed cheers, mirrors the rallies of secular dictators and celebrity culture, not the humble reception of the Vicar of Christ. The faithful are reduced to a cheering section for a global celebrity, their “contagious joy” a symptom of the emotionalism and superficiality that have replaced the theological virtues of faith, hope, and charity. The article’s focus on “colourful clothing,” “rhythmic sounds of percussion and brass instruments,” and “nonstop singing and clapping” reveals a profound confusion between authentic Catholic worship and pagan revelry. The Church has always taught that sacred music and liturgy must direct the soul to God, not merely stimulate the senses. This scene is a microcosm of the conciliar revolution: the substitution of the sacred with the profane, the supernatural with the natural, and the worship of God with the celebration of man.
The Social Reign of Christ the King: A Forgotten Doctrine
The centerpiece of the usurper’s visit to Cameroon was his address to the country’s authorities, members of civil society, and the diplomatic corps. The article states that “The Pope prompted several rounds of applause during his speech, in which he advocated for women’s rights and called for an ‘unarmed’ peace that is ‘not based on fear, threats or weapons’.” This is a direct repudiation of the teaching of Pope Pius XI in the encyclical Quas Primas, where he established the Feast of Christ the King and declared that the reign of Christ extends over all nations, both Catholic and non-Catholic, and that rulers and governments have the duty to publicly honor and obey Him. Pius XI wrote: “The state is happy not by one means, and man by another; for the state is nothing else than a harmonious association of men.” He further warned: “When God and Jesus Christ – as we lamented – were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.”
In stark contrast, Leo XIV’s call for an “unarmed” peace based on “dialogue” and “women’s rights” is a purely naturalistic and secular vision, indistinguishable from the platitudes of the United Nations or any other humanist organization. There is no mention of the necessity of conversion to the Catholic Faith, no call for the establishment of the Social Reign of Christ the King, no warning about the eternal consequences of rejecting God’s laws. This is the “peace” of the world, which Christ Himself warned would be a source of division: “Do not think that I came to send peace upon earth: I came not to send peace, but the sword” (Matt. 10:34). The true peace of Christ is not the absence of conflict but the order established by the submission of individuals and societies to the divine law. As Pius XI taught, “Peace is only possible in the kingdom of Christ.”
The advocacy for “women’s rights” is equally suspect. The Church has always upheld the dignity and vocation of women, but within the framework of divine revelation and the natural law. The modern concept of “women’s rights” is often a vehicle for the promotion of contraception, abortion, and the dissolution of the family, all of which are condemned by the perennial Magisterium. By aligning himself with this secular agenda, Leo XIV reveals himself as a servant of the world, not of Christ.
The Orphanage: Charity Without the Supernatural
The visit to the Ngal Zamba Orphanage, run by the Congregation of the Daughters of Mary, is presented as a highlight of the trip. The article describes the children and religious sisters as “overjoyed,” with the Pope smiling happily amidst songs and cheers. While corporal works of mercy are indeed part of the Church’s mission, they must always be ordered towards the supernatural end of salvation. The article’s focus on the emotional and sentimental aspects of the visit—”the sisters and children crowded around him and paraded him out with nonstop singing and clapping”—reveals a reduction of charity to mere humanitarianism. There is no mention of the children being taught the Catholic Faith, no reference to the sacraments, no indication that the ultimate purpose of their care is to lead them to eternal life.
This is the charity of the conciliar sect: warm, fuzzy, and ultimately empty. It is the charity of the world, which feeds the body but neglects the soul. The true charity of the Church is inseparable from the preaching of the Gospel and the administration of the sacraments. As St. James teaches, “Faith without works is dead” (James 2:26), but works without faith are equally barren. The article’s silence on the supernatural dimension of the orphanage’s mission is deafening and exposes the naturalistic mentality of the post-conciliar Church.
The “Bishops” of Cameroon: Apostles of the New Order
The day concluded with a private meeting between Leo XIV and the “Bishops” of Cameroon at the headquarters of the National Episcopal Conference. The article provides no details of their discussion, but given the trajectory of the conciliar sect, it is safe to assume that the topics were limited to social justice, ecumenism, and the implementation of the latest “papal” directives. These “bishops” are not successors of the Apostles in the true sense; they are functionaries of the neo-church, appointed to perpetuate the errors of Vatican II and to suppress any remnants of the traditional Faith.
The private nature of the meeting is also telling. In the pre-conciliar Church, the acts of the hierarchy were often public and subject to scrutiny by the faithful. The secrecy of the conciliar sect is a sign of its corruption and its fear of exposure. What do these “bishops” have to hide? Their silence on the errors of the “popes,” their complicity in the destruction of the liturgy, their promotion of false ecumenism and religious liberty—all of these are crimes against the Faith that cannot withstand the light of day.
The Language of the Conciliar Sect: A Linguistic Analysis
The article’s language is a textbook example of the rhetoric of the post-conciliar Church. Words like “dialogue,” “peace,” “bridges,” “diversity,” and “rights” are repeated ad nauseam, while terms like “conversion,” “heresy,” “schism,” “sin,” and “judgment” are conspicuously absent. This is not merely a matter of style; it reflects a fundamental shift in the Church’s self-understanding. The conciliar sect no longer sees itself as the one true Church entrusted with the mission of saving souls, but as a partner in the global project of human development and interfaith harmony.
The use of the term “Holy Father” to describe a manifest heretic is particularly offensive. This title, reserved for the true Pope, is now applied to a man who promotes the very errors condemned by his predecessors. It is a blasphemy against the Holy Ghost, who guides the Church into all truth, and a scandal to the faithful who are led to believe that the conciliar sect is the true Church.
The Symptomatic Level: The Fruits of the Conciliar Revolution
The events described in the article are not isolated incidents; they are the inevitable fruits of the conciliar revolution. Since the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958, the structures occupying the Vatican have been systematically dismantling the Faith and replacing it with a naturalistic, humanist, and ecumenical ideology. The “popes” of the conciliar sect are not the Vicars of Christ but the chief executives of a global NGO, more concerned with public relations and political correctness than with the salvation of souls.
The visit to Africa is a case in point. The continent is ripe for evangelization, with millions of souls hungering for the true Faith. Yet the message brought by Leo XIV is not the Gospel of Christ but the gospel of the world: peace without Christ, charity without the sacraments, and dialogue without conversion. This is the abomination of desolation foretold by Our Lord: “The hour cometh, that whosoever killeth you, shall think that he doth a service to God” (John 16:2). The concilar sect, in its zeal to be relevant to the world, has become irrelevant to God.
Conclusion: The Duty of the Faithful
The article from VaticanNews is a stark reminder of the depth of the crisis in the structures occupying the Vatican. The usurper Leo XIV and his cohort of “bishops” and “priests” are not the leaders of the Catholic Church but the agents of the Antichrist, working to deceive the faithful and lead them to perdition. The duty of every Catholic who wishes to remain faithful to the unchanging teachings of the Church is to reject the conciliar sect and all its works, to seek out the true sacraments from validly ordained priests, and to pray for the restoration of the Holy See.
As Pope Pius IX taught in the Syllabus of Errors, “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” is a condemned proposition (Proposition 80). The events of Leo XIV’s apostolic journey are a living proof of this condemnation. Let us not be deceived by the false peace and false charity of the world, but let us hold fast to the Faith once delivered to the saints, “contending earnestly for the faith which was once delivered to the saints” (Jude 1:3).
Source:
Day Three in Africa: From Algeria to Cameroon (vaticannews.va)
Date: 15.04.2026