VaticanNews portal reports on a telephone conversation between the usurper Robert Francis Prevost, known as “Pope” Leo XIV, and António Costa, President of the European Council. The discussion focused on geopolitical matters, specifically the Middle East and the condition of certain communities, alongside reflections on a recent journey to Africa. This exchange, framed as a “cordial discussion,” is a perfected manifestation of the post-conciliar apostasy, substituting the supernatural mission of the Church with naturalistic humanitarianism and false ecumenical dialogue, thereby accelerating the ruin of souls.
The Usurper as a Functionary of the New World Order
The very premise of this report is built upon a foundational deception: the recognition of Robert Prevost as the legitimate “Pope.” From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, the See of Peter is vacant. Prevost is a usurper, the latest in a line of antipopes beginning with John XXIII, who have systematically dismantled the Catholic Church and replaced it with a modernist sect. His actions are not those of the Vicar of Christ, but of a CEO managing a global NGO.
The conversation with António Costa — a figure deeply embedded in the secular, Masonic power structures of Europe — reveals the true nature of the conciliar sect. The Church of Christ was established to teach, govern, and sanctify, leading souls to eternal salvation through the preaching of the Gospel and the administration of the sacraments. It was not founded to serve as a diplomatic advisory body to the European Council on geopolitical stability. Pius XI, in his encyclical Quas Primas, unequivocally stated that the Church “demands for itself… full freedom and independence from secular authority.” This usurper, however, does not demand independence; he seeks integration into the secular power structure, becoming a useful instrument for the very forces that seek to marginalize the true Faith.
The Substitution of Evangelization with “Interreligious Dialogue”
The most damning element of this conversation is its stated focus. There is no mention of the conversion of souls to the Catholic Faith, the only Ark of Salvation. Instead, the usurper “emphasized the importance of interreligious dialogue.” This is the hallmark of the apostate conciliar church. The Church has always taught that there is no salvation outside of her (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus), and that the duty of the Pope and all bishops is to preach Christ crucified to all nations.
This “dialogue” is not a search for truth, but a relativistic exercise that places the Catholic Faith on the same level as Islam, Judaism, and paganism. It is a direct implementation of the modernist heresy condemned by St. Pius X, who identified the pursuit of novelty and the corruption of dogma as the “synthesis of all errors” (Pascendi Dominici Gregis). The usurper’s focus on “dialogue” with non-Christians, while ignoring the necessity of their conversion, is a betrayal of the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19-20). It transforms the Church from a militant institution fighting for the salvation of souls into a passive observer in a pluralistic world.
Naturalistic Humanism vs. the Supernatural Order
The report notes the discussion on the “situation of Christians in southern Lebanon” and the “most disadvantaged communities” in Africa. While the suffering of the faithful is a reality, the conciliar approach to this suffering is entirely naturalistic. It focuses on material and social conditions — peace, stability, support for the disadvantaged — while remaining entirely silent about the supernatural causes of this suffering and the only true remedy: the return of society to the Kingship of Christ.
Pius XI lamented that “the hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior” (Quas Primas). The wars, persecutions, and chaos in the Middle East and Africa are the direct result of the rejection of God’s laws and the rise of secularism. The true remedy is not “interreligious dialogue” or European Council policy, but the consecration of nations to the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the public acknowledgment of Christ the King. By omitting this, the usurper and Costa offer only band-aids for mortal wounds, ignoring the cancer of sin and apostasy that afflicts the modern world.
Africa: A Continent Betrayed
The mention of the usurper’s “Apostolic Journey” to Algeria, Cameroon, Angola, and Equatorial Guinea is particularly grotesque. These are nations where the Faith was planted by the blood of martyrs and the sweat of true missionaries. Today, they are ravaged by poverty, Islamic expansion, and internal strife. The conciliar response to this is to send a modernist figurehead to “dialogue” with local leaders and offer “support for the disadvantaged.”
This is the opposite of the missionary spirit of the Church. True missionaries went to Africa to baptize, to establish the sacramental life, and to build Christendom. The usurper goes to validate the local religious syncretism and to act as a spokesman for the globalist agenda. The journey is not an apostolic mission; it is a public relations tour for the Church of the New Advent, designed to project an image of relevance and compassion while abandoning the souls entrusted to these shepherds to the wolves of secularism and false religions.
The Silence that Condemns
The most glaring omission in this report, and in the actions of the usurper, is the silence about the state of grace, the necessity of the sacraments, and the reality of hell. There is no call to repentance. There is no warning that without the Catholic Faith, all the “peace” and “dialogue” in the world will not save a single soul. The language is entirely horizontal, concerned only with earthly affairs. This is the “cult of man” condemned by the pre-conciliar Magisterium, where the supernatural is entirely eclipsed by the natural.
The Syllabus of Errors condemned the proposition that “the Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Proposition 80). This conversation with António Costa is the living embodiment of that condemned proposition. The usurper has reconciled himself with the modern world, and in doing so, he has severed himself from the true Church. He is not the successor of Peter; he is the servant of the prince of this world.
Conclusion: The Bankruptcy of the Conciliar Sect
This telephone call is a microcosm of the entire conciliar revolution. It demonstrates the complete inversion of the Church’s mission. The usurper Leo XIV does not act as the defender of the Faith, but as a diplomat for a dying civilization. He does not preach the Gospel, but promotes a relativistic “dialogue.” He does not call for the conversion of nations, but for their integration into a secular, humanist framework.
The faithful must see this for what it is: a confirmation of the vacancy of the Holy See. The men who occupy the Vatican are not the leaders of the Catholic Church; they are the caretakers of an antichurch dedicated to the worship of man and the service of the world. True peace will only come when Christ is recognized as King, not in the palaces of the European Council, but in the hearts of the faithful and the laws of nations. Until then, the words of Pius XI remain the only hope: “The hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior.”
Source:
Pope Leo speaks with the President of the European Council (vaticannews.va)
Date: 29.04.2026