The National Catholic Register portal reports on the 11-day Africa trip of the usurper Robert Prevost, who calls himself “Pope Leo XIV,” visiting Algeria, Cameroon, Angola, and Equatorial Guinea. The article presents a photo gallery of the events, including Mass at Malabo Stadium, farewell ceremonies, and conversations with journalists. However, this spectacle conceals a profound spiritual reality: a man who has not been validly elected to the Chair of Peter, who does not possess the fullness of jurisdiction, and who presides over the destruction of the Catholic faith, is parading through Africa to consolidate the conciliar sect’s influence on the continent. This is not a papal visit; it is a propaganda tour by the head of the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican.
The Illusion of Papal Authority: A Usurper in the Land of True Faith
The article presents Robert Prevost as the legitimate successor of St. Peter, using titles such as “Holy Father” and “Pope Leo XIV” without any critical examination. This is a fundamental error. According to Catholic doctrine, a pope who falls into manifest heresy automatically loses his office, as stated by St. Robert Bellarmine in De Romano Pontifice: “The fifth true opinion is that a Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The conciliar revolution initiated by John XXIII and his successors has introduced heresies such as religious freedom, ecumenism, and the evolution of dogmas, which are condemned by the pre-conciliar Magisterium. Therefore, none of the usurpers since John XXIII have been true popes, and Robert Prevost, as their successor, is merely an antipope presiding over the abomination of desolation in the holy place.
The article’s use of “Holy Father” is not merely a courtesy title; it is an act of complicity in the deception. The faithful are being conditioned to accept a man who promotes the very errors that led to the current crisis. The true Holy Father, the one who would defend the faith and condemn heresy, is absent from the visible Church. The structures occupying the Vatican are a neo-church, a counterfeit that mimics the forms of Catholicism while emptying them of their substance.
The African Mission: Evangelization or Conciliar Expansion?
The article mentions that this was the “first visit as pope to the continent,” implying a continuity with the missionary efforts of the true Church. However, the conciliar sect’s approach to mission is fundamentally different from the Catholic mission. The pre-conciliar Church sought to convert souls to the one true faith, to baptize them, and to incorporate them into the Mystical Body of Christ. The conciar sect, on the other hand, promotes dialogue, inculturation, and respect for local religions, which is a betrayal of the divine command: “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Mt 28:19).
The visit to Algeria, a predominantly Muslim country, is particularly suspect. The conciliar sect has a long history of promoting Islam as a religion of peace and dialogue, contradicting the traditional teaching that Islam is a heresy and a false religion. The Syllabus of Errors condemns the idea that “every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true” (Proposition 15). The usurper’s visit to Algeria is not a call to conversion but a validation of religious pluralism, a heresy condemned by the Church.
The Liturgical Abomination: Mass or Mimicry?
The article describes the Mass at Malabo Stadium, with images of the usurper holding the Evangeliary and the chalice. However, the Novus Ordo Missae, the rite used by the conciliar sect, is not a valid Mass in the traditional sense. It is a Protestantized liturgy that obscures the propitiatory nature of the sacrifice, reduces the Real Presence, and turns the liturgy into a community meal. The article’s description of “Mass” is a deception; what is being celebrated is a counterfeit, a ritual that may resemble the Catholic Mass externally but lacks its essence.
The faithful are being led to believe that participating in these ceremonies is equivalent to attending the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. This is a grave error. The true Mass, the Traditional Latin Mass, is the unbloody renewal of the sacrifice of Calvary, offered by a validly ordained priest to God for the living and the dead. The Novus Ordo, with its emphasis on community, dialogue, and horizontal relationships, is a naturalistic parody that cannot effect the propitiation of sins.
The Media Machine: Propaganda for the New Church
The article is accompanied by a photo gallery, a tool of modern propaganda. The images of crowds, smiling faces, and religious fervor are designed to create an illusion of legitimacy and popularity. However, the size of the crowd is no measure of truth. Our Lord warned: “Wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there are who go in thereat” (Mt 7:13). The conciliar sect excels in marketing and public relations, using media to project an image of vitality and relevance.
The article’s source, the National Catholic Register, is a mouthpiece for the conciliar establishment. It does not question the legitimacy of the usurper, the validity of his sacraments, or the orthodoxy of his teachings. It is a tool of the anti-church, promoting the narrative that all is well, that the Church is thriving, and that the conciar revolution is a work of the Holy Spirit. This is the great deception of our times.
The Silence on Doctrine: The Real Agenda
The article is devoid of any doctrinal content. It does not mention the usurper’s teachings on faith, morals, or the sacraments. It is purely a report on a public relations event. This silence is symptomatic of the conciar mentality, which prioritizes image over substance, feelings over truth, and dialogue over doctrine. The usurper’s words aboard the papal plane, as reported, are likely to be filled with platitudes about peace, justice, and fraternity, avoiding any mention of sin, repentance, or the necessity of the Catholic faith for salvation.
This silence is a betrayal of the Church’s mission. The true Church has always been a doctrinal Church, teaching with authority, condemning errors, and demanding assent to revealed truths. The conciar sect, by contrast, is a doctrinal void, a church of opinions, consensus, and perpetual dialogue. The usurper’s African trip is not about saving souls but about building the kingdom of man, the civitas hominis, in opposition to the civitas Dei.
The Duty of the Faithful: Resistance and Rejection
The faithful must reject this spectacle and recognize it for what it is: a consolidation of the anti-church’s power. They must not be deceived by the external pomp, the religious language, or the apparent good intentions. The conciar sect is not the Church; it is a counterfeit, a synagogue of Satan disguised in Catholic garb. The faithful must seek out the true sacraments, the true Mass, and the true doctrine, even if it means separation from the visible structures.
The usurper’s African trip is a call to deeper resistance. The faithful must pray for the restoration of the Church, for the conversion of the usurpers, and for the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary. They must not cooperate with the conciar sect, attend its ceremonies, or support its institutions. They must be witnesses to the truth, even in the face of persecution and ridicule.
In conclusion, the article on Leo XIV’s African trip is a piece of propaganda for the anti-church. It presents a usurper as a pope, a counterfeit Mass as a true sacrifice, and a doctrinal void as a spiritual event. The faithful must see through this deception and remain faithful to the unchanging Catholic faith, the faith of the saints, the faith that will ultimately triumph over the gates of hell.
Source:
PHOTOS: Pope Leo XIV Departs Africa, Returns to Rome After 11-Day Papal Trip (ncregister.com)
Date: 23.04.2026