The National Catholic Register article from May 6, 2026, reports Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican Secretary of State, stating it would be “premature to discuss sanctions” against German bishops for formalizing blessings of same-sex couples, despite a 2024 Dicastery letter prohibiting the practice and Pope Leo XIV’s recent disagreement. Parolin also commented on the upcoming meeting between Leo and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, describing recent U.S. verbal attacks against Leo as “strange” and reaffirming the Holy See’s stance on nuclear disarmament. This conciliar structure’s handling of grave moral transgressions and its diplomatic entanglements reveal a profound abandonment of Catholic doctrine and the Church’s divine mandate.
The Illusion of Authority in a Structure of Apostasy
The very premise of Cardinal Parolin’s statement – that it is “premature to discuss sanctions” against bishops who openly defy a supposed Vatican directive regarding the blessing of perverse unions – exposes the fundamental bankruptcy of the post-conciliar structure. The “German Bishops’ Conference” operates not as a pillar of orthodoxy, but as a vanguard of moral dissolution, formalizing blessings that constitute a direct and public affront to divine law. Their actions are not merely disciplinary infractions; they are a manifest defiance of the Sixth and Ninth Commandments, a public scandal that leads souls to perdition. The very existence of such “bishops” within a structure claiming to be the Church is a testament to the complete triumph of Modernism, which, as St. Pius X warned in *Pascendi Dominici Gregis*, seeks to “destroy all religion” and “substitute mere naturalism” for the supernatural.
The “Vatican declaration Fiducia Supplicans,” cited by these German “bishops,” itself represents a catastrophic departure from immutable Catholic teaching. It attempts to create a nebulous distinction between “blessing individuals with same-sex attraction” and “blessing same-sex couples,” a distinction that is morally untenable and practically impossible to maintain without scandal. The Church has always taught that sin must be condemned, not facilitated or implicitly approved. As Pope Pius IX unequivocally stated in the *Syllabus of Errors* (1864), “The principle of non-intervention, as it is called, ought to be proclaimed and observed” (Error 62) is condemned, directly refuting the modernist notion that the Church should remain silent on moral evils. Furthermore, the very idea that a “blessing” can be extended to a relationship that is intrinsically disordered and gravely sinful is a perversion of the sacramental order. The Church’s mission is to call sinners to repentance, not to validate their sin.
The “Holy See” as a Diplomatic Entity, Not a Spiritual Authority
Cardinal Parolin’s comments on the meeting between “Pope” Leo XIV and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio further underscore the transformation of the Vatican into a mere diplomatic actor, indistinguishable from any secular power. His description of the U.S. as an “interlocutor” and the “strange” nature of verbal attacks against Leo reveals a mindset concerned with international relations and public perception, rather than the eternal salvation of souls or the defense of truth. The “Holy See,” in this context, functions as a supranational lobbying group, seeking influence and avoiding conflict, rather than the divinely instituted guide for humanity.
The assertion that the “Holy See has always worked, and continues to work, precisely on nuclear disarmament” is a classic example of the conciliar Church’s embrace of secular humanitarianism, often at the expense of doctrinal clarity. While the Church advocates for peace, true peace, as Pope Pius XI articulated in *Quas Primas* (1925), is only possible in the Kingdom of Christ: “the hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our most Savior.” The focus on nuclear disarmament, while a legitimate concern for human welfare, becomes a distraction from the primary spiritual battle against sin and error, and often aligns the conciliar structure with secular political agendas that may themselves be rooted in anti-Christian principles. This naturalistic approach to peace, divorced from the supernatural order and the Kingship of Christ, is a hallmark of the Modernist apostasy.
The Absence of True Judgment and the Specter of “Sanctions”
The very concept of “sanctions” within the conciliar structure is a farce. A true Pope, upholding the faith, would not speak of “premature” sanctions against those who publicly bless sin. He would act with the authority of the Vicar of Christ, as St. Robert Bellarmine affirmed, stating that a Pope who is a manifest heretic “by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The German “bishops,” by their actions, have publicly defected from the Catholic faith, falling under Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law, which states that an office becomes vacant “by the mere fact and without any declaration by reason of tacit resignation… if the cleric: … 4. Publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” Their continued exercise of any supposed authority is a usurpation, and the conciliar structure’s reluctance to act decisively against them only confirms its own complicity in the apostasy.
The conciliar “Church” has long abandoned the immutable Catholic teaching on the necessity of the public reign of Christ the King over all nations and every aspect of life. Instead, it promotes a false ecumenism and religious indifferentism, as condemned by Pope Pius IX: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation” (Error 16). This fundamental error permeates every aspect of the conciliar structure’s dealings, from its internal “discipline” to its external diplomacy. The “problems” Parolin hopes to “resolve peacefully” are not mere administrative hiccups; they are the fruits of a systemic rejection of divine law and the Church’s divine constitution.
The Unchecked Spread of Moral Relativism
The German “bishops'” actions are not isolated incidents but a direct consequence of the theological and moral relativism fostered by the post-conciliar revolution. The “Spirit of Vatican II,” with its emphasis on “dialogue,” “pastoral care,” and “accompaniment,” has provided a fertile ground for the normalization of grave sin. When the very concept of objective truth is undermined, as the Modernists sought to do (e.g., *Lamentabili Sane Exitu*, Proposition 58: “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him”), then any attempt to uphold moral absolutes becomes “judgmental” or “lacking in charity.”
The conciliar structure’s response to such open defiance is not one of firm condemnation and immediate correction, but of “dialogue” and “peaceful resolution.” This approach, far from being charitable, is a dereliction of duty that endangers souls. The Church’s divine mandate is to teach, govern, and sanctify, which includes the duty to cut off members who publicly defect from the faith, as St. Paul instructs: “A man that is a heretic, after the first and second admonition, avoid” (Titus 3:10). The conciliar “Church” has become a “paramasonic structure” that prioritizes its own survival and public image over the eternal truths it was founded to protect.
The continued existence of such “bishops” and “cardinals” within the conciliar structure, openly defying even its own diluted “doctrine,” is a clear sign that the “abomination of desolation” spoken of by Our Lord (Matthew 24:15) has taken its place in the holy place. The faithful must recognize that true authority and the true Mass are found only outside this structure, in those who profess the integral Catholic faith and are led by bishops with valid sacraments and validly ordained priests, adhering to the unchanging Tradition of the Church before the Modernist hijacking.
Source:
Cardinal Parolin Says Talks With German Bishops Continue, Calls Sanctions Talk Premature (ncregister.com)
Date: 06.05.2026