EWTN News portal reports on the Catholic Church’s response to artificial intelligence, highlighting Pope Leo XIV’s engagement with AI ethics through various addresses, messages, and documents since his election in 2025. The article presents the conciliar sect’s approach as a balanced engagement with modern technology, emphasizing human dignity, ethical frameworks, and the limitations of AI compared to human intelligence. It chronicles statements from “Pope” Leo XIV and documents like *Antiqua et Nova* and the Rome Call for AI Ethics, portraying the Vatican’s stance as a thoughtful integration of Catholic social teaching with technological advancement. However, this entire enterprise is built upon the foundational heresies of the post-conciliar abomination, rendering its ethical pronouncements spiritually void and dangerously misleading, as they flow from an authority that has already rejected the supernatural order and the true sovereignty of Christ the King.
The Supremacy of God’s Law Over Human Invention
The conciliar obsession with artificial intelligence as a subject for papal reflection and “ethical guidance” is itself a symptom of the profound spiritual blindness that has afflicted the structures occupying the Vatican since the death of Pope Pius XII. While the world plunges headlong into the creation of soulless machines that mimic human thought, the true “industrial revolution” that demands the Church’s unwavering attention is the revolution against God Himself—the systematic dismantling of the supernatural order, the denial of Original Sin, the rejection of the propitiatory sacrifice of the Mass, and the enthronement of man as the measure of all things. **Pope Leo XIV speaks of AI posing “new challenges for the defense of human dignity,” yet he and his predecessors have presided over the greatest assault on human dignity in history: the destruction of the true Faith, the poisoning of sacramental life, and the abandonment of souls to a false ecumenism that denies the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation.**
The article quotes “Pope” Leo XIV stating that “our personal life has greater value than any algorithm,” a statement that, while superficially true, is rendered hypocritical by the very system he represents. The conciliar sect has consistently subordinated the eternal value of the soul to temporal, naturalistic concerns. Its “social teaching” has been reduced to a pale imitation of secular humanism, advocating for “justice” and “labor rights” while remaining silent on the intrinsic evil of divorce, contraception, abortion, and homosexuality—evils that directly destroy human dignity far more effectively than any algorithm. **To speak of “human dignity” without grounding it in the redemption of Christ, the grace of the sacraments, and the moral law of God is to speak of a phantom dignity, one that is easily sacrificed on the altar of political expediency and globalist ideology.**
The Heresy of Progress and the Evolution of Doctrine
The choice of the name “Leo XIV” by Robert Prevost, explicitly referencing Leo XIII and *Rerum Novarum*, is not a return to tradition but a modernist appropriation of it. The article notes his desire to address the “next industrial revolution,” framing AI as a new challenge analogous to the industrial revolution of the 19th century. This framing itself reveals the core modernist heresy: the belief that the Church must continually adapt its teaching to the “sign of the times,” that doctrine is not immutable but must evolve in response to historical developments. **This is the very error condemned by Pope St. Pius X in *Pascendi Dominici Gregis*, where he identified the modernist as one who “demands that the religious philosophy of the modernists should be taken as the basis of the religious sciences… and that the ecclesiastical authority should be made to conform to the results of modern research.”**
The document *Antiqua et Nova*, released under the antipope Francis and cited approvingly by Leo XIV, is a prime example of this modernist drift. While it speaks of “human dignity” and the limitations of AI, it does so within a framework that has already accepted the conciliar revolution’s fundamental premise: that the Church’s primary mission is no longer the salvation of souls through the preaching of the Gospel and the administration of the sacraments, but rather engagement with the world on its own terms. **The “ethical framework” proposed for AI is built not on the unchanging rock of Catholic doctrine, but on the shifting sands of secular bioethics and human rights ideology—ideas that were explicitly condemned by Pope Pius IX in the *Syllabus of Errors* as incompatible with the Faith.**
The Silence on the True Danger: Modernism and Apostasy
The article’s comprehensive overview of the Vatican’s AI pronouncements reveals a glaring omission: any mention of the true spiritual dangers facing humanity. There is no mention of the conciliar apostasy itself as the greatest threat to human dignity, no recognition that the structures from which these AI ethics flow are themselves in a state of formal heresy and schism. **The “enemies within” that Pope St. Pius X warned against in *Pascendi*—the modernists who “seek to reform the Church by adapting it to the spirit of the age”—are now the very architects of Vatican policy.**
The focus on AI as a “challenge” serves as a convenient distraction from the real crisis: the loss of faith among the faithful, the emptying of churches, the corruption of morals, and the systematic destruction of Catholic identity. While “Pope” Leo XIV warns that AI “cannot replace human intelligence” or “offer real wisdom,” he fails to acknowledge that the conciliar sect has already replaced divine wisdom with human prudence, supernatural faith with naturalistic reason, and the authority of God with the consensus of experts and technocrats. **The “wisdom” that AI lacks is the same wisdom that the post-conciliar church has abandoned: the wisdom of the Cross, the wisdom that is foolishness to the world, the wisdom that recognizes the absolute sovereignty of God over all creation, including human technology.**
The Idolatry of Technology and the Cult of Man
The very act of dedicating papal addresses, messages, and even an anticipated encyclical to the subject of AI elevates a human invention to a level of importance that borders on idolatry. While the Church has always taught the legitimate use of human reason and technology, it has also consistently warned against the pride of intellectus and the danger of placing more trust in human creations than in God. **The conciliar obsession with AI reflects the anthropocentric turn of Vatican II, where man, not God, became the center of ecclesial concern. The “dignity of the human person” is invoked not as a consequence of man’s creation in the image of God and redemption by Christ, but as an autonomous, self-referential value—a secular dignity baptized with Christian language but emptied of supernatural content.**
The article’s description of the Vatican hosting conferences on AI, with “builders of AI” gathering at the papal court, is emblematic of this inversion. Instead of calling the world to repentance and conversion, the conciliar sect positions itself as a partner in technological development, offering “ethical guidance” to those who would build machines that increasingly dominate human life. **This is not the role of the Church of Christ, which is to proclaim the Kingdom of God, not to bless the kingdoms of men. As Pope Pius XI declared in *Quas Primas*, “The kingdom of Christ encompasses all men… and it matters not whether individuals, families, or states, for men united in societies are no less subject to the authority of Christ than individuals.” To speak of AI without first affirming the absolute lordship of Christ over all human activity, including technological innovation, is to commit the sin of omission that defines modernism.**
The Illusion of Moral Authority in a Heretical Structure
The entire premise of the article—that the “Catholic Church” is providing ethical guidance on AI—is built upon a fundamental deception. The structures that have produced the Rome Call for AI Ethics, *Antiqua et Nova*, and the addresses of “Pope” Leo XIV are not the Catholic Church. They are the conciliar sect, a pseudo-religious body that has broken communion with the perennial Magisterium of the Church. **As the sedevacantist position demonstrates, grounded in the teaching of St. Robert Bellarmine and the canonical tradition, a manifest heretic cannot be the head of the Church. The post-conciliar occupants of the Vatican, by their public and persistent propagation of heresies condemned by the pre-conciliar Magisterium, have ipso facto lost any claim to authority.**
Therefore, their pronouncements on AI, however well-intentioned they may appear, carry no more moral weight than those of any secular ethics committee. **To seek guidance on the moral use of technology from an institution that has already rejected the moral law on issues of far greater consequence—such as the indissolubility of marriage, the existence of hell, and the necessity of baptism for salvation—is to build a house on sand.** The faithful are not only free but obligated to reject such guidance, recognizing it as yet another manifestation of the conciliar sect’s attempt to maintain relevance in a world that is rapidly moving toward the worship of the Beast.
Conclusion: Return to the Immutable Truth
The conciliar sect’s engagement with artificial intelligence is not a sign of vitality but of terminal decay. It reveals an institution that has lost the sense of its supernatural mission and has reduced itself to a player in the global conversation on technology and ethics—a conversation dominated by secular humanism, transhumanism, and the worship of progress. **The true response of the Catholic Church to AI is not the production of ethical frameworks that accommodate the world, but the uncompromising proclamation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the affirmation of the social Kingship of Christ, and the call to repentance and conversion.**
The faithful must reject the false authority of the conciliar sect and return to the immutable Tradition of the Church—the Tradition that recognizes no “new challenges” that would require the adaptation of doctrine, the Tradition that places God above all human inventions, and the Tradition that alone can provide true wisdom in an age of technological darkness. **As Pope St. Pius X warned, “The office committed to the pastor is to feed the flock, not to feed himself; and if he devotes himself to the pursuit of worldly goods, he is a hireling, not a shepherd.” The conciliar sect’s pursuit of relevance through engagement with AI is the pursuit of worldly goods, and its shepherds are hirelings who have abandoned the flock to the wolves of modernism and apostasy.**
Source:
The Catholic Church's response to AI — so far (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 15.05.2026