Vatican News portal reports that the 11th Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, held at the United Nations, concluded on Friday, May 23, 2026, without the adoption of a final document, exposing deep divisions among the parties involved. The article notes that delegates failed to reach consensus on a common text, with disagreements centering on regional security, the modernisation of nuclear arsenals, and tensions surrounding nuclear facilities in conflict zones. The piece further highlights that “Holy See observers and delegations” echoed appeals made by “Pope Leo XIV, Pope Francis and their predecessors,” calling for “integral disarmament” and the elimination of nuclear weapons, affirming that “peace cannot be founded upon the threat of mutual destruction.” The article concludes by noting that despite the failure, diplomats recognized “continuing awareness of the grave risks posed by nuclear weapons.” Yet this entire framing — from the conciliar Vatican’s appeals to the UN’s multilateral diplomacy — rests upon a foundation of theological and practical bankruptcy, revealing the utter futility of seeking peace without the public acknowledgment of Our Lord Jesus Christ’s Kingship over all nations.
The UN: A Den of Nations in Revolt Against God
The United Nations, that Masonic-inspired tower of Babel erected upon the ruins of Christendom, has once again demonstrated its fundamental incapacity to secure genuine peace. The failure of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Review Conference is not a surprise — it is the inevitable fruit of an institution built upon the rebellion of nations against the social reign of Christ the King. Pope Pius XI, in his encyclical Quas Primas (1925), taught with luminous clarity: “His reign, namely, extends not only to Catholic nations or to those who, by receiving baptism according to law, belong to the Church, even though their erroneous opinions have led them astray or discord has separated them from love, but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The UN, by its very constitution, excludes this foundational truth. It gathers nations as if they were sovereign entities answerable to no higher law than their own will — a principle that Pius XI explicitly condemned: “When God and Jesus Christ — as we lamented — were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.”
The article’s reference to “geopolitical instability” and “deep divisions among the parties involved” is a masterful exercise in understatement. These divisions are not merely political — they are spiritual. Nations that have expelled God from their constitutions, their laws, and their public life cannot but clash with one another, for as the same Pontiff declared: “The state is happy not by one means, and man by another; for the state is nothing else than a harmonious association of men.” Without the bond of Catholic truth, harmony is impossible, and treaties signed in bad faith or in ignorance of divine law are worthless scraps of paper. The Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX condemned the proposition that “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Proposition 80). The UN represents the very embodiment of this condemned proposition — a forum where the world’s nations attempt to build peace without Christ, and inevitably fail.
The Conciliar “Holy See”: A Diplomatic Actor Without Spiritual Authority
The article invokes the appeals of “Pope Leo XIV, Pope Francis and their predecessors” for “integral disarmament” and the elimination of nuclear weapons. This is the language of the conciliar sect — a Vatican that has abandoned its prophetic mission to preach the integral social Kingship of Christ in favor of humanitarian pleas addressed to a world that does not recognize God’s authority. The pre-conciliar Magisterium spoke with the voice of authority, commanding rulers and nations. Pius XI did not merely “appeal” — he instituted a feast and commanded that states recognize Christ’s royal authority: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ, but let them fulfill this duty themselves and with their people, if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate and contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness.”
The conciliar Vatican, by contrast, sends “observers” and “delegations” to the United Nations — an organization condemned by the pre-conciliar Magisterium as a manifestation of the sects that wage war against the Church. The Syllabus of Errors explicitly anathematized secret societies and their offspring, and the 1917 Code of Canon Law (Canon 2335) imposed automatic excommunication on those who joined Masonic associations. The UN, as a diplomatic expression of the same naturalistic and relativistic principles, is no less suspect. The conciliar structures occupying the Vatican have, since John XXIII’s Pacem in Terris — that Masonic encyclical addressed “to all men of good will” rather than to the baptized faithful — consistently pursued a policy of engagement with the enemies of the Church, trading doctrinal clarity for diplomatic respectability.
The article’s claim that “peace cannot be founded upon the threat of mutual destruction” is true in itself, but it is presented in a thoroughly naturalistic framework that omits the only foundation upon which true peace can be built: the social reign of Christ the King. Pius XI taught: “Oh, what happiness we would enjoy if individuals, families, and states allowed themselves to be governed by Christ.” The conciliar Vatican’s appeals for “dialogue, cooperation, and authentic peace founded on justice and fraternity” are empty phrases — the language of the UN itself, not of the Catholic Church. True fraternity is impossible without the Fatherhood of God, and true justice is impossible without the divine law as the foundation of all human law.
The Omission of Russia and the Silence on Masonic Operations
The article’s title mentions that “Russia, Belarus conduct nuclear exercise” — a factual observation that should, for any Catholic analyzing world events through the lens of faith, immediately raise the question of the conversion of Russia. Yet the conciliar Vatican, having abandoned the prophetic warnings of the pre-conciliar Magisterium regarding modernist apostasy within the Church itself, is incapable of reading the signs of the times. The Fatima apparitions — whatever their true nature, and the evidence strongly suggests a Masonic psychological operation against the Church, as the ritualistic 200-year cycles from 1717 (founding of Freemasonry) to 1917 (apparitions) to 2017 (canonization by the conciliar sect) indicate — at minimum served to focus attention on Russia. But the conciliar structures have systematically reinterpreted the Fatima message in an ecumenical key, transforming the “conversion of Russia” into a vague prayer for peace that legitimizes dialogue with schismatic Orthodoxy — a clear violation of Catholic ecclesiology.
The pre-conciliar Church understood that Russia’s communism was not merely a political problem but a spiritual one — a manifestation of the organized revolt of the sects against Christ the King. Pius XI lamented: “The flames of mutual hatred and internal discord consume and contribute to the destruction of people and nations distant from God.” The modernist apostasy within the Church — the “enemies within” warned of by St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907) and in the decree Lamentabili Sane Exitu — is the primary danger, far exceeding any external military threat. St. Pius X condemned the modernist proposition that “The Church is an enemy of the progress of natural and theological sciences” (Proposition 57) and that “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him” (Proposition 58). The conciliar revolution is the full flowering of these condemned errors.
Nuclear Weapons and the Theology of Peace
The pre-conciliar Magisterium’s teaching on war and peace was grounded in the theology of the Mystical Body and the social kingship of Christ. Peace is not the mere absence of armed conflict — it is the tranquillitas ordinis, the tranquility of order, which requires that all things be ordered according to their proper end in God. Pius XI taught: “For just as the royal dignity of our Lord surrounds the earthly authority of princes and rulers with a certain religious reverence, so it also dignifies the duties and obedience of citizens.” A world order built upon the exclusion of Christ from public life is inherently disordered, and no treaty — nuclear or otherwise — can substitute for the missing foundation.
The article’s reference to “humanitarian concerns linked to the catastrophic consequences of any use of nuclear weapons” reflects the conciliar shift from theological to humanitarian categories. While the Church has always taught the moral limits of warfare, the pre-conciliar Magisterium framed these limits within the context of divine law and the supernatural end of man. The conciliar approach reduces the question to one of “humanitarian concern” — the language of the UN, not of the Catholic Church. This is the cult of man that Pius XI foresaw and condemned: the elevation of naturalistic humanitarianism above the supernatural order.
The Failure of Multilateral Dialogue Without the True Faith
The article notes that “diplomats noted that the discussions reflected a continuing awareness of the grave risks posed by nuclear weapons and the need to preserve channels of negotiation.” This is the language of despair masquerading as hope. The “channels of negotiation” are channels that lead nowhere, because they are built upon the exclusion of the only true Foundation. Pius XI warned: “We therefore have strong hope that the feast of Christ the King, which we shall henceforth celebrate annually, will bring society back to our most beloved Savior.” The conciliar sect, by suppressing the Feast of Christ the King in its traditional form and replacing it with the ambiguous “Solemnity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, King of the Universe” in the reformed liturgy, has symbolically and practically abandoned the Church’s mission to demand the recognition of Christ’s social reign.
The 1917 Code of Canon Law, in Canon 188.4, established that “every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration by reason of tacit resignation, recognized by the law itself, if the cleric publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” The conciliar structures, by embracing religious liberty (Dignitatis Humanae), false ecumenism, and the hermeneutics of continuity that denies the rupture of Vatican II, have publicly defected from the Catholic faith. Their appeals for disarmament at the UN carry no more spiritual authority than those of any secular humanitarian organization — indeed, less, because they pretend to speak with a mandate they no longer possess.
Conclusion: Only Christ the King Can Establish True Peace
The failure of the UN Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Review Conference is not a tragedy — it is a revelation. It reveals the impotence of a world order built upon the rejection of Christ the King. It reveals the bankruptcy of the conciliar Vatican’s diplomatic engagement with the enemies of the Church. And it reveals the urgent need to return to the unchanging teaching of the pre-conciliar Magisterium.
Pius XI’s words ring with prophetic clarity: “Then at last, so many wounds can be healed, then there will be hope that the law will regain its former authority, sweet peace will return again, swords and weapons will fall from hands, when all willingly accept the reign of Christ and obey Him, and every tongue will confess that our Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father.”
No treaty, no conference, no “multilateral dialogue” can substitute for this confession. The path to true peace does not lead through the corridors of the United Nations — it leads through the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the sacraments of the true Church, and the public, social, and official recognition of Our Lord Jesus Christ as King of all nations, all peoples, and all individuals. Instaurare omnia in Christo — to restore all things in Christ. This is the only program that can save the world from the abyss toward which it rushes.
Source:
Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty Review Conference fails to reach agreement (vaticannews.va)
Date: 23.05.2026