VaticanNews portal reports that the apostate occupying the Chair of Peter, Leo XIV, is scheduled to meet with “victims of abuse by members of the clergy” during his apostolic journey to Spain commencing June 6, 2026. The director of the Holy See Press Office, Matteo Bruni, confirmed the meeting, noting it was organized by the local conciliar structures and emphasizing respect for privacy. This gesture, paraded as an act of pastoral charity, is a calculated public relations maneuver that obscures the systemic, doctrinal rot of the conciliar sect and its refusal to address the true root of the crisis: the abandonment of Catholic doctrine and the destruction of the priesthood.
The Theater of Contrition: A Public Relations Strategy, Not a Pastoral Solution
The VaticanNews article states that the meeting was organized by the “Spanish Church”—a euphemism for the Spanish Episcopal Conference, a body thoroughly infiltrated by modernists since the false Vatican II council. The article notes that the Spanish Church has “implemented various initiatives aimed at prevention and reparation,” including a recent protocol with the Ministry of the Presidency. This collaboration with secular authorities to manage a spiritual crisis reveals the naturalistic mindset of the conciliar sect. Instead of proclaiming the necessity of sanctifying grace, the sacrament of Penance, and the eternal consequences of sin, the “Church” reduces a spiritual catastrophe to a bureaucratic and legalistic issue of “protocols” and “justice” as defined by the secular state.
Matteo Bruni’s statement that “further information may be provided after the meeting itself, with respect for the victims, their wishes, and their privacy,” is a classic tactic of opacity. The conciar sect thrives on controlled narratives. True justice, in the Catholic sense, requires the public denunciation of heresy and the defense of the faith, not closed-door meetings designed to manage public relations. The privacy afforded to “victims” is a shield behind which the systemic causes of the abuse—namely, the destruction of priestly formation and the introduction of psychological and humanistic methods in seminaries—remain unaddressed.
The Root of the Crisis: Modernism and the Destruction of the Priesthood
The article conveniently omits the theological and historical context of the abuse crisis. It is not a series of isolated incidents but the direct, logical fruit of the modernist revolution. As St. Pius X unequivocally taught in *Pascendi Dominici gregis*, Modernism is the “synthesis of all errors,” leading to the corruption of doctrine and morals. The conciliar sect, by embracing the “spirit of Vatican II,” effectively gutted the theology of the priesthood. The ontological distinction between the ordained priest and the laity was blurred, replaced by a Protestantized concept of “ministry” that emphasizes community service over the offering of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the salvation of souls.
When the conciliar sect speaks of “prevention,” it means psychological screening and bureaucratic oversight, not the rigorous ascetical and doctrinal formation required by the Council of Trent. The true remedy for the crisis of abuse is a return to the immutable Catholic faith: the understanding that the priest acts *in persona Christi*, that sins against the Sixth Commandment are mortal sins that lead to Hell, and that the Church has the divine mandate to separate the wicked from her midst. By refusing to condemn modernism and its fruits, Leo XIV and his predecessors are like physicians who treat the symptoms of a disease while feeding the virus.
The Usurper’s Incompetence: A Manifest Apostate Presiding Over Ruin
The article mentions that similar meetings took place during the pontificates of the usurpers Benedict XVI and Francis. This continuity demonstrates that the entire post-1958 apparatus is complicit. Leo XIV, as a product of this system, possesses no spiritual authority to heal the wounds of the Church. According to the principles articulated by St. Robert Bellarmine and codified in Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law, a Pope who is a manifest heretic ceases to be Pope. Leo XIV, by his adherence to the heretical doctrines of the conciar sect—such as religious liberty and ecumenism—is a manifest heretic. Therefore, his meetings are not acts of the Papacy but the gestures of a private individual, devoid of any jurisdictional or spiritual efficacy.
The article quotes Bruni regarding the “painful reality” of abuse. However, the true painful reality is the state of apostasy in which the conciliar sect finds itself. Pius XI, in *Quas Primas*, taught that when Jesus Christ and His law are removed from society, “the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The abuse crisis is a symptom of a society and a “Church” that have removed Christ from their midst. Until the reign of Christ the King is re-established in society and the true faith is restored in the Church, no amount of “meetings” or “protocols” will suffice. The conciar sect offers only the medicine of the world: psychology, bureaucracy, and public relations, while rejecting the only true cure: the integral Catholic Faith and the sacraments.
Source:
Pope scheduled to meet with abuse victims during visit to Spain (vaticannews.va)
Date: 05.06.2026