Vatican News portal reports on the “apostolic journey” of the antipope Leo XIV to Spain, describing the “powerful display of faith, unity, and affection” in Madrid. The article by Massimiliano Menichetti presents the event as a triumph of the post-conciliar “Church,” emphasizing the crowds, the orderly enthusiasm, the seven-minute ovation in Parliament, and the message of “peace, solidarity, and renewed sense of purpose.” The author frames the visit as a “genuine response” of the Spanish people to the “Successor of Peter,” who allegedly “strengthened the faithful in their faith” and challenged Spain and Europe to “rediscover the Gospel as a path toward peace.” The article highlights the antipope’s speech before State institutions, where he reaffirmed that “authentic democratic coexistence cannot be separated from the defense of every human life, support for the most vulnerable, the protection of freedom of conscience and religion, and the rejection of all war and violence.” The tone is one of triumphalism, presenting the conciliar sect as a force for good in the world, capable of uniting people and inspiring them to build a “fraternal, inclusive, supportive, welcoming, humane, and at peace” society. This entire narrative is a masterclass in naturalistic humanism, reducing the supernatural mission of the Church to a mere social program and exposing the complete bankruptcy of the post-conciliar revolution, which has abandoned the proclamation of the Kingship of Christ in favor of a vague, feel-good humanitarianism that is indistinguishable from secular liberalism.
The Triumph of Naturalism: A “Gospel” Stripped of the Supernatural
The article’s central thesis is that the antipope’s visit to Spain was a “genuine response” of the people to the “Gospel,” yet the content of this “Gospel” is entirely naturalistic. The antipope’s message, as presented, is a collection of secular platitudes: “defense of every human life” (without specifying the primary threat of abortion and euthanasia, which the conciar sect often downplays or even supports through its political alliances), “support for the most vulnerable” (a vague humanitarianism that could come from any secular NGO), “protection of freedom of conscience and religion” (a direct echo of the heretical Vatican II declaration Dignitatis Humanae, condemned by the Syllabus of Errors, prop. 77-79), and “rejection of all war and violence” (a pacifism that ignores the Church’s teaching on just war and the spiritual battle against Satan). There is no mention of the necessity of the Catholic faith for salvation, no call to conversion, no mention of the sacraments, no warning about the state of grace, no reference to the Four Last Things. This is not the Gospel of Jesus Christ; it is the gospel of the United Nations, the gospel of the Antichrist.
Pius XI, in Quas Primas, unequivocally stated that the Kingdom of Christ “extends not only to Catholic nations or to those who, by receiving baptism according to law, belong to the Church, even though their erroneous opinions have led them astray or discord has separated them from love, but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The antipope’s message, by contrast, is a capitulation to the secular order, a refusal to proclaim the divine right of Christ the King over all nations and individuals. Instead of demanding that Spain and Europe recognize the social reign of Christ, he offers “friendship in Christ” as a means to “transform the life of every person who welcomes Him”—a transformation defined entirely in horizontal, human terms: “rescuing people from selfishness, exploitation, evil, and hatred.” This is the language of the aggiornamento, the modernization of the Church that was condemned by St. Pius X as the “synthesis of all errors” (Pascendi Dominici Gregis).
The “Living Conscience” vs. the Immutable Law of God
The article describes the response of the Spanish people as “the breath of a living conscience rising up and affirming what is good and beautiful.” This phrase is deeply revealing. The “living conscience” is a modernist concept, implying that moral truth is not fixed by divine law but is discovered through subjective experience and collective sentiment. This is directly contrary to Catholic teaching, which holds that conscience must be formed by the objective law of God, as taught by the Magisterium. The Syllabus of Errors condemned the proposition that “moral laws do not stand in need of the divine sanction, and it is not at all necessary that human laws should be made conformable to the laws of nature and receive their power of binding from God” (prop. 56). The antipope’s appeal to a “living conscience” is an invitation to moral relativism, where “what is good and beautiful” is determined by the feelings of the crowd rather than the eternal law of God.
Furthermore, the article’s emphasis on “unity in diversity” is a hallmark of the conciliar ecumenism that was condemned by Pius XI in Mortalium Animos. True unity is found only in the unity of the Catholic faith, not in a vague “diversity” that includes error. The antipope’s call for “unity in diversity” is a call for the dissolution of Catholic identity into a syncretistic mush, where all beliefs are equally valid and the Church’s claim to be the one true religion is abandoned.
The Silence on the Kingship of Christ: The Gravest Omission
The most glaring omission in the entire article is any mention of the Kingship of Christ. The antipope, who claims to be the “Vicar of Christ,” did not proclaim Christ as King of Spain, King of Europe, or King of the world. He did not demand that the Spanish state recognize the social reign of Christ, as taught by Pius XI in Quas Primas. He did not call for the consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, as requested at Fatima (a false apparition, but even its message, properly understood, would have been a call to recognize the divine order). Instead, he offered “friendship” and “love”—a horizontal, naturalistic message that is indistinguishable from the rhetoric of any secular leader.
This silence is not accidental; it is the essence of the conciliar revolution. The post-conciliar “Church” has systematically abandoned the proclamation of the Kingship of Christ in favor of a “dialogue” with the world that is, in reality, a capitulation to the world. The antipope’s visit to Spain is a perfect illustration of this apostasy: a “pope” who does not act as the Vicar of Christ, but as a global humanitarian, a spiritual CEO of a feel-good movement that has nothing to do with the supernatural mission of the Church.
The “Breath of a Living Conscience” or the Breath of the World?
The article’s triumphalism is deeply misplaced. The crowds in Madrid may have been enthusiastic, but enthusiasm is not faith. The seven-minute ovation in Parliament is not a sign of conversion; it is a sign of political correctness, of a society that values “tolerance” and “inclusion” over truth. The antipope’s message, as presented, is a validation of the secular order, not a challenge to it. He did not call Spain to repentance; he called it to “rediscover the joy of the Gospel”—a “Gospel” that, as presented, is nothing more than a call to be nice to each other and build a better world through human effort.
This is the fruit of the conciliar revolution: a “Church” that has lost its supernatural identity and become a chaplain to the world. The antipope’s visit to Spain is not a triumph of the faith; it is a triumph of naturalism, a demonstration that the post-conciliar “Church” has nothing to offer but what the world already has. The true Church, the Church of all ages, endures in the faithful who profess the integral Catholic faith and are led by bishops with valid sacraments and validly ordained priests. They alone carry the true Gospel, the Gospel of the Kingship of Christ, the Gospel that demands conversion, repentance, and the recognition of the absolute primacy of God’s laws over all human laws.
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation Continues
The antipope’s visit to Spain is yet another manifestation of the abomination of desolation that has occupied the Vatican since the death of Pius XII. It is a spectacle of naturalism, a celebration of the “living conscience” over the immutable law of God, a triumph of the conciliar revolution’s apostasy from the supernatural mission of the Church. The crowds may have cheered, but the true faithful weep, for they see the betrayal of the Kingdom of Christ by those who claim to be His representatives on earth. Let us pray for the true Church, for the true faithful, and for the restoration of the social reign of Christ the King, which alone can bring true peace to Spain, to Europe, and to the world.
Source:
Pope Leo in Spain: Madrid's uncontainable response (vaticannews.va)
Date: 09.06.2026