VaticanNews portal reports that the usurper Robert Prevost, styling himself “Pope Leo XIV,” returned from his so-called “apostolic journey” to Spain (June 6–12, 2026) and expressed gratitude at the Angelus for the welcome he received from the Spanish people and King Felipe VI. The report highlights that when the papal plane suffered a mechanical failure, the King offered his private plane to transport the antipope back to Rome. Leo XIV thanked “the Bishops of Spain,” “all the communities I visited,” and “the entire Church in Spain,” concluding with the perfunctory invocation: “May God always bless Spain!” The entire spectacle — a globe-trotting pretender to Peter’s throne, shuttled on a monarch’s private jet, thanking bishops who share his modernist apostasy — is a textbook demonstration of how the conciliar sect has reduced the Vicar of Christ’s mission to that of a traveling diplomat and celebrity, devoid of any supernatural content.
The “Apostolic Journey”: A Diplomatic Tour Disguised as Religion
Let us be precise about what occurred. Robert Prevost, an antipope occupying the structures of the Vatican, traveled to Spain — a nation that once produced saints like Ignatius of Loyola, John of the Cross, and Teresa of Ávila, and which once understood that the Catholic faith demands the public, social reign of Christ the King over all nations. Today, Spain is a post-Christian wasteland of secularism, divorce, abortion, and religious indifferentism, and the conciliar sect does nothing to condemn this apostasy. Instead, the usurper arrives, shakes hands with a king, accepts the use of a private plane, and offers vacuous thanks.
What is conspicuously absent from this entire report? Any mention of the supernatural mission of the Church. There is no call to conversion, no condemnation of heresy, no demand that Spain return to the public acknowledgment of Christ the King’s rights over the nation. The encyclical Quas Primas of Pius XI is unequivocal: “The state is happy not by one means, and man by another; for the state is nothing else than a harmonious association of men” — and Christ’s reign extends over states as well as individuals. Pius XI warned that “when God and Jesus Christ — as we lamented — were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The usurper’s journey to Spain does nothing to restore Christ’s social kingship. It merely legitimizes a secular order that has expelled God from public life.
The Mechanical Failure: A Symbolic Judgment
It is worth noting — with the sobriety that the conciliar sect never applies to itself — that the “papal plane” suffered a mechanical failure. The usurper required the private aircraft of a king to return to Rome. One is reminded of the words of the Syllabus of Errors (Proposition 80): “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” — condemned by Pius IX as an error. The entire conciliar project, from John XXIII onward, has been precisely this reconciliation with modernity. And now the very machinery of the antipope’s travel fails him, requiring rescue by the secular power. Let those with eyes to see, see.
Gratitude Without Content: The Language of the Neo-Church
The language employed by the usurper and reported by VaticanNews is revealing in its emptiness. “I thank the Spanish people, who welcomed me with great enthusiasm and devotion.” “I affectionately thank the Bishops.” “May God always bless Spain!” These are the platitudes of a Rotary Club president, not the words of the Vicar of Christ. Where is the language of the Fathers? Where is the fire of a St. Paul, who declared: “If I preach the gospel, I have nothing to glory of: for a necessity lieth upon me: for woe is unto me if I preach not the gospel” (1 Cor. 9:16)? Where is the severity of a St. Pius X, who in Lamentabili Sane Exitu condemned the modernist proposition that “the Church is an enemy of the progress of natural and theological sciences” (Proposition 57), and who understood that the Church’s mission is not to be “welcomed with enthusiasm” by a world in rebellion against God, but to teach, govern, and sanctify with supernatural authority?
The report states that the bishops “guided the faithful to welcome the Holy Father.” Let us be clear: these are not bishops in the Catholic sense. They are modernist functionaries of the conciliar sect, men who accept the heretical teachings of Vatican II on religious liberty (Dignitatis Humanae), ecumenism (Unitatis Redintegratio), and the collegiality that undermines papal primacy. That they “guided the faithful” to welcome the usurper is not a sign of health but of the depth of the apostasy. As Bellarmine teaches, “a manifest heretic cannot be Pope” — and the bishops who sustain the conciar project are themselves manifest heretics, having defected from the Catholic faith by embracing the errors condemned in the Syllabus, Lamentabili, and Pascendi Dominici Gregis.
The King’s Private Plane: Caesar Serves the Counterfeit Church
The detail that King Felipe VI offered his private plane to the usurper is rich with symbolism. The relationship between the conciliar sect and secular powers has always been one of mutual legitimization. The secular state tolerates the neo-church as a harmless spiritual decoration, and the neo-church, in turn, blesses the secular order. This is the exact opposite of the teaching of Pius XI in Quas Primas: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ, but let them fulfill this duty themselves and with their people, if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate and contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness.”
Instead, we have a king rescuing an antipope — a vivid image of the inversion of the proper order. The Catholic teaching is that temporal authority exists to serve the spiritual, not the reverse. But in the conciar dispensation, the spiritual authority (such as it is) depends on the charity of secular princes. This is not the Church of Christ. This is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt. 24:15).
What the Report Omits: The Silence That Condemns
The most damning aspect of this report is what it does not say. There is no mention of the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass as the center of the “apostolic journey.” There is no mention of the sacraments, of the state of grace, of the necessity of conversion, of the reality of hell, of the social kingship of Christ, of the errors of Vatican II, of the duty of Catholic rulers to profess and defend the faith publicly. The entire report is written in the naturalistic, horizontal language of the conciliar sect — a language that reduces the Church’s mission to human encounters, diplomatic courtesies, and emotional warmth.
This silence is not accidental. It is the defining characteristic of the modernist heresy as diagnosed by St. Pius X in Pascendi: the reduction of the supernatural to the natural, of dogma to sentiment, of the Church to a humanitarian organization. The usurper’s journey to Spain is not an act of the Catholic Church. It is a public relations exercise by a paramasonic structure that has occupied the Vatican and emptied it of Catholic content.
Conclusion: The Faithful Must Recognize the Abyss
The faithful who still profess the integral Catholic faith must see these events for what they are. Robert Prevost is not the Pope. He is a usurper sustained by a conciliar sect that has defected from the Catholic faith. His “apostolic journeys” are not acts of the Church’s supernatural mission but diplomatic tours that legitimize the secular order and the modernist bishops who collaborate with it. The mechanical failure of his plane, the rescue by a king, the vacuous gratitude — all of it is a parable of the conciliar sect’s dependence on the world it was supposed to convert.
The true Church endures — in the faithful who profess the unchanging Catholic faith, in the priests who offer the true Mass of the ages, in the bishops who have not bowed to the Baal of Vatican II. To them, the words of Pius IX in the Syllabus remain as urgent as ever: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Proposition 55) — condemned, because the Church demands freedom to fulfill her divine mission, not subservience to Caesar. And the words of Pius XI: “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” Until that authority is publicly recognized — in Spain, in Rome, and throughout the world — there can be no true peace, no true order, and no true Church visible in the structures that currently occupy the Vatican.
Source:
Pope Leo renews gratitude to God for Apostolic Journey to Spain (vaticannews.va)
Date: 14.06.2026