VaticanNews portal reports on June 18, 2026, that the usurper of Peter’s throne, Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), received the President of the Republic of Peru, Mr. José María Balcázar Zelada, in the Vatican. The meeting was followed by talks with Cardinal Pietro Parolin and Archbishop Paul Richard Gallagher at the Secretariat of State, described as “cordial,” focusing on socio-economic trends, illegal mining, the “common good,” “dialogue,” social cohesion, migration, organized crime, and the repercussions of conflicts. This diplomatic exchange, devoid of any mention of the supernatural mission of the Church or the salvation of souls, exemplifies the conciliar sect’s reduction of the Faith to mere naturalistic humanism and social activism, betraying the true purpose of the Holy See as the guardian of eternal truths and the spiritual welfare of nations.
The Usurper’s Court: A Stage for Temporal Affairs
The very act of Leo XIV receiving a head of state is presented with the pomp and ceremony befitting a sovereign, yet stripped of its true spiritual significance. The Vatican, once the bastion of Christ’s Kingdom on earth, now operates as a secular diplomatic entity, indistinguishable from any other international organization. The “cordial” conversations and the focus on “good relations” reveal a Church that has traded its prophetic voice for political expediency. Where is the call to conversion? Where is the demand for the recognition of Christ the King over Peru and all nations? The silence is deafening, echoing the apostasy that has consumed the conciliar structures since the mid-20th century.
The “Common Good” Without Christ: A Modernist Chimera
The statement from the Holy See Press Office highlights “socio-economic trends, illegal mining activity, the promotion of the common good and dialogue, as well as commitment to social cohesion.” This litany of secular concerns, while perhaps laudable in a purely naturalistic sense, is a grotesque parody of the Church’s true mission. The bonum commune (common good) of Catholic teaching is intrinsically ordered towards the supernatural end of man: the salvation of souls and the glory of God. As Pope Pius XI unequivocally stated in his encyclical Quas Primas (1925), “The Kingdom of our Redeemer encompasses all men… His reign, namely, extends not only to Catholic nations or to those who, by receiving baptism according to law, belong to the Church, even though their erroneous opinions have led them astray or discord has separated them from love, but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” To speak of the “common good” without explicitly subordinating it to the divine law and the social reign of Christ is to embrace the very secularism and laicism that Pius XI condemned as a “plague that poisons human society.”
“Dialogue” as a Substitute for Truth
The emphasis on “dialogue” is a hallmark of the post-conciliar apostasy. True dialogue, in the Catholic sense, is not a negotiation of truths or a search for common ground with error, but a proclamation of the Gospel, calling all to conversion and submission to the one true Faith. The modernist “dialogue” is a relativistic exercise that implicitly denies the Church’s exclusive claim to truth and her divine mandate to teach all nations. It is the language of indifferentism, condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (1864), which anathematized the proposition that “every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true” (Proposition 15). The conciliar sect’s obsession with “dialogue” is a tacit admission that it no longer believes in the objective, unchanging truths of the Catholic Faith, preferring instead a pragmatic engagement with the world on its own fallen terms.
Migration, Crime, and Conflicts: A Worldly Agenda
The discussion on “the phenomenon of migration, organized crime, and the repercussions of conflicts” further underscores the conciliar sect’s descent into purely temporal concerns. While the Church has always taught the importance of charity and justice towards all, including migrants, her primary concern is always the spiritual welfare of souls. The modernist focus on these issues, divorced from their supernatural context, reduces the Church to a mere NGO, a humanitarian agency concerned with worldly problems rather than the eternal destiny of humanity. This is the “cult of man” that St. Pius X warned against in Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907), where he described Modernism as the “synthesis of all errors,” leading to the “destruction of all religion” and the “deification of human nature.”
The Absence of the Supernatural: A Telltale Sign
Perhaps the most damning aspect of this entire report is what is conspicuously absent: any mention of the supernatural. There is no reference to the sacraments, the state of grace, the necessity of conversion, the dangers of sin, the reality of hell, or the hope of heaven. The “Holy See” engages with a head of state as if the Church were merely a social institution, not the divinely instituted Ark of Salvation. This silence is not accidental; it is the very essence of Modernism, which, as St. Pius X explained, “places the foundation of religious philosophy in that doctrine which is commonly called Agnosticism,” thereby “removing all relations between man and God” and “relegating religion to the domain of private sentiment.” The conciliar sect has effectively amputated the supernatural from its public life, leaving only a hollow shell of social activism and diplomatic niceties.
The Perpetuation of the Conciliar Revolution
This meeting between Leo XIV and the President of Peru is not an isolated incident but a continuation of the conciliar revolution that began with John XXIII and Vatican II. The “Church of the New Advent” has consistently prioritized engagement with the world over fidelity to Tradition, dialogue over doctrine, and temporal concerns over eternal truths. The “bishops” and “cardinals” who facilitate these encounters are not successors of the Apostles but agents of a new religion, one that is “broad and liberal Protestantism” disguised in Catholic vestments, as the Lamentabili sane exitu (1907) prophetically condemned. The faithful must recognize these actions for what they are: a further entrenchment of the abomination of desolation in the holy place, a betrayal of Christ’s Kingship, and a call to reject the conciliar sect in its entirety.
Conclusion: A Call to Fidelity
The diplomatic activities of Leo XIV and his conciliar apparatus are a stark reminder of the spiritual bankruptcy that has overtaken the Vatican. The Church, as established by Christ, is a perfect society, endowed with all the means necessary for the salvation of souls and the glorification of God. Her mission is not to solve worldly problems or to engage in secular diplomacy, but to proclaim the Gospel, administer the sacraments, and lead all men to eternal life. The conciliar sect has abandoned this mission, replacing it with a naturalistic humanism that is an affront to the Kingship of Christ. The faithful must reject these modernist innovations and cling to the unchanging Tradition of the Catholic Faith, recognizing that true peace and order can only be found in the Kingdom of Christ, as Pius XI so powerfully declared: “Then at last… so many wounds can be healed, then there will be hope that the law will regain its former authority, sweet peace will return again, swords and weapons will fall from hands, when all willingly accept the reign of Christ and obey Him, and every tongue will confess that our Lord Jesus Christ is in the glory of God the Father.”
Source:
Pope Leo receives the President of the Republic of Peru (vaticannews.va)
Date: 18.06.2026