Vatican News portal reports that the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV received a delegation from the “Ecumenical Patriarchate” of Constantinople on the feast of Saints Peter and Paul, calling for joint preparation of a 2033 “millennium of the Redemption” celebration across all “Christian denominations.” The antipope hailed the schismatic Bartholomew as shepherd of a “sister Church,” praised the 1700th anniversary of Nicaea as testimony to existing “communion,” and reduced the Gospel to a platform for world peace, technology ethics, and “care for creation.” This spectacle of apostasy confirms the conciliar sect’s definitive rupture with the Catholic Faith: it prostitutes the Nicene Creed to false unity, substitutes Christ’s Social Kingship for naturalistic humanitarianism, and prepares a Masonic counterfeit jubilee for 2033.
The Antichurch’s Ecumenical Farce: Legitimizing Schism as “Sister Church”
The very phrase “sister Church in Constantinople” uttered by the antipope Leo XIV constitutes a formal heresy against the unity and unicity of the Church of Christ. Unam sanctam catholicam et apostolicam Ecclesiam (One, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church) — there is no “sister” Church outside her. The Schism of 1054 severed Constantinople from the Roman Pontiff; the “Ecumenical Patriarchate” remains in schism, devoid of the primacy of Peter which is the sine qua non of Catholic unity. Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors condemned the proposition that “National churches, withdrawn from the authority of the Roman pontiff and altogether separated, can be established” (Error 37). He further anathematized the claim that “The Roman pontiffs have, by their too arbitrary conduct, contributed to the division of the Church into Eastern and Western” (Error 38). By embracing the schismatic patriarch as a brother and his see as a “sister Church,” the antipope ratifies the schism, denies the necessity of unity under Peter, and makes himself an accomplice in the sin of schism — schismaticus non est in Ecclesia (a schismatic is not in the Church).
The “traditional exchange of visits on the feasts of the patron saints” is not a pious custom but a ritualized apostasy, a diplomatic theater that normalizes the scandal of division. St. Robert Bellarmine teaches that a manifest heretic or schismatic “by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The same principle applies to any prelate who publicly adheres to schism: he cuts himself off from the Church. The antipope’s “delight” at this exchange manifests the animus of the conciliar sect: not the conversion of schismatics to the one true Church, but the consolidation of a pan-Christian syncretism that denies the very definition of the Church.
The Nicene Creed Prostituted to False Unity: “Unity in the Trinity, Trinity in Unity”
The antipope’s declaration that the 1700th anniversary of Nicaea offered “an eloquent testimony to the communion that already exists amongst those who share faith in God… and believe in Jesus Christ, as Lord and Son of God” is a diabolical inversion of the Council’s purpose. Nicaea defined the consubstantiality of the Son against Arianism; it did not establish a vague “communion” of those who merely “believe in Jesus Christ as Lord.” The Arians also “believed in Jesus Christ” — but denied His divinity. The Nicene Creed is a symbolum fidei, a rule of faith that excludes heretics, not a lowest-common-denominator platform for ecumenical dialogue.
The formula “Unity in the Trinity, Trinity in Unity” — presented as a “model of true unity within legitimate diversity” — is a Masonic slogan masquerading as theology. It suggests that doctrinal diversity (schism, heresy) is “legitimate” within a higher unity, precisely the condemned error of indifferentism. Pope Pius IX condemned: “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion, in which form it is given to please God equally as in the Catholic Church” (Syllabus, Error 18). The “Ecumenical Patriarchate” holds to the Photian schism, denies the Filioque, rejects papal infallibility and primacy of jurisdiction — these are not “legitimate diversity” but mortal wounds to the Faith. St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu condemned the Modernist proposition that “The dogmas which the Church proposes as revealed are not truths of divine origin but are a certain interpretation of religious facts” (Prop. 22). The antipope treats the Nicene dogmas as mere “guiding principles” for a humanly constructed unity, stripping them of their binding, exclusive, and salvific force.
Reduction of the Redemption to Naturalistic Peace-Building
The antipope’s statement that “Christians—reconciled amongst themselves and united in their profession of the one faith—are called to be a credible sign of peace, making a decisive contribution to the efforts of all men and women of good will to build peace” reveals the naturalistic heart of the conciliar religion. The Redemption is not a project for world peace, technology ethics, or “care for creation.” Non est pax nisi in regno Christi (There is no peace except in the Kingdom of Christ). Pope Pius XI in Quas Primas declared: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” The antipope inverts this: he proposes a “peace” built on human collaboration, “good will,” and shared humanitarian values — the very laicism and secularism that Pius XI identified as “the plague that poisons human society.”
The claim that “it is not only the credibility of the Christian message that is at stake, but the very future of humanity” is a blasphemous displacement of eschatology. The future of humanity is determined by its submission or rebellion to Christ the King, not by the success of ecumenical “cooperation.” The Gospel does not command “cooperation amongst Christians in the face of today’s challenges — which include peace, the proper use of new technologies, and care for creation.” It commands: “Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you” (Mt 28:19-20). The “responsibility for the life and dignity of every human being” cited by the antipope is truncated to a naturalistic humanitarianism, silent on the supernatural life of grace, the necessity of baptism, the reality of hell, and the Social Kingship of Christ over nations and laws.
The 2033 Jubilee: A Masonic Counterfeit of Christ’s Kingship
The call to “celebrate the Year 2033, commemorating two thousand years of the Lord’s Redemption” “together by all the Christian denominations of the world” is the apex of the Masonic operation foretold in the analysis of the False Fatima Apparitions: “Symbolism of dates: 1717 (founding of Freemasonry), 1917 (apparitions), 2017 (canonization) – ritualistic 200-year cycles.” The year 2033 marks 200 years since the formal establishment of the Masonic “Grand Orient” structures in many nations, and 100 years since the 1933 encyclical Quadragesimo Anno — but more significantly, it is the bicentennial of the Alta Vendita instructions for the infiltration of the Church. The “common celebration” of Redemption by “denominations” that deny the very nature of the Redemption (the propitiatory Sacrifice, the necessity of the Church, the Papacy) is a satanic parody of the Great Jubilee of 2000, itself a Modernist spectacle.
Pope Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely to combat the “secularism of our times, so-called laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors” (Quas Primas). He decreed that “the annual celebration of this solemnity will also remind states that not only private individuals, but also rulers and governments have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him.” The antipope’s 2033 project does the opposite: it invites the world’s false religions to a shared table, removing Christ from His throne as King of Nations and replacing Him with a vague “Risen One” who inspires “unity” without truth. This is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place — a counterfeit jubilee for a counterfeit church.
Silence on the Social Kingship of Christ: The Gravest Omission
The most damning evidence of the antipope’s apostasy is what he omits. Not a word on the Social Kingship of Christ. Not a word on the duty of the State to profess the Catholic Faith, to enact laws conformable to divine law, to suppress public blasphemy and heresy. Not a word on Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus. Not a word on the necessity of conversion to the one, true, visible Church for salvation. The Syllabus of Errors condemned: “The Church is not a true and perfect society, entirely free… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church” (Error 19); “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55); “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). The antipope’s entire address is a practical application of these condemned errors. He speaks the language of the “civil power,” of “men of good will,” of “humanity’s future” — the language of the Cité de l’Homme, not the Cité de Dieu.
Anathema on Ecumenism: The Syllabus and Pascendi Vindicated
The “Defense of Sedevacantism” file demonstrates that a manifest heretic loses his office ipso facto: “A Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head… a manifest heretic cannot be Pope. It cannot be objected that the character remains in him… therefore, the Fathers teach universally that a heretic, because of heresy and independently of excommunication, is deprived of all jurisdiction and power.” The antipope Leo XIV, by this single address, manifests the heresy of ecumenism, the heresy of religious indifferentism, the heresy of denying the Social Kingship of Christ, the heresy of legitimizing schism. He is not a Pope; he is a usurper occupying the Chair of Peter, the “abomination of desolation” foretold by Daniel and Christ.
The “False Fatima Apparitions” file exposes the ecumenical project as a Masonic tool: “The imprecise formulation ‘conversion of Russia’ (without specifying Catholicism) opens the way to religious relativism. It can serve to legitimize dialogue with schismatic Orthodoxy.” The antipope’s address is the fulfillment of this strategy: a “common celebration” of Redemption without unity of faith, without submission to Peter, without the Catholic Church. It is the synagoga Satanae gathering its troops against the Church of Christ, as Pius IX warned in the Syllabus introduction: “It is from them that the synagogue of Satan, which gathers its troops against the Church of Christ, takes its strength.”
True Catholics, adhering to the immutable Tradition, the Magisterium of Pius IX, Leo XIII, St. Pius X, Pius XI, and Pius XII, reject this entire spectacle. We recognize no “pope” after 1958, no validity in the conciliar sect’s “sacraments,” no legitimacy in its “ecumenical dialogues.” We await the restoration of the true Papacy and the Social Reign of Christ the King. Viva Cristo Rey! Adveniat Regnum Tuum!
Source:
Pope: All Christians called to celebrate 2033 anniversary of Christ's Redemption (vaticannews.va)
Date: 30.06.2026