The EWTN News portal reports on the festivities surrounding the feast of Sts. Cyril and Methodius in Slovakia and the Czech Republic, where the usurper antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) sent his “blessing” via the apostolic nuncio Nicola Girasoli. The celebrations, presided over by the modernist “Cardinal” Ladislav Nemet and attended by secular politicians, epitomize the complete substitution of the social reign of Christ the King (Quas Primas) with a naturalistic, ecumenical humanitarianism.
The Usurper’s “Blessing” and the Encyclical of Man
The article states that the nuncio Girasoli delivered the “papal blessing” citing the antipope’s encyclical Magnifica Humanitas, urging Christians to “disarm their words and temper aggression in public life and the media.” This title alone — Magnifica Humanitas — reveals the anthropocentric inversion at the heart of the conciliar sect. Where Pius XI proclaimed Quas Primas to establish the feast of Christ the King as a remedy against the “plague of secularism, so-called laicism” (Quas Primas, §24), the false “pope” issues an encyclical magnifying humanity. The Syllabus of Errors condemned the proposition that “the civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41) and that “the Church ought to be separated from the State” (Error 55). Here, the antichurch’s “nuncio” addresses a crowd including the current and former presidents of Slovakia, Peter Pellegrini and Ivan Gašparovič, effectively sanctifying the Masonic separation of Church and State by reducing the Gospel to a program of civic politeness.
Reduction of the Apostles of the Slavs to Cultural Animators
The “Cardinal” Nemet declares:
“Culture must be respected and developed… Culture is created by man, and therefore we have a calling to shape our own culture — to bear witness to how we believe in God and to live as good Christians in peace and cooperation with all.”
This is practical atheism. Sts. Cyril and Methodius did not traverse Great Moravia to “shape culture” or foster “peace and cooperation with all.” They came to convert souls to the one true Faith, to baptize nations into the Unam Sanctam, and to subject them to the regnum Christi. The Syllabus condemns the error that “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Error 18) and that “every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which… he shall consider true” (Error 15). Nemet’s “mission… belongs to every baptized person” beginning “where we are” in “how we speak, how we forgive” is a Pelagian caricature of the apostolic mandate: Going therefore, teach ye all nations; baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you (Mt 28:19-20). The mission is the propagation of the depositum fidei, not the cultivation of humanistic “values.”
The “Velehrad Appeal”: Ecumenism as Apostasy
In Velehrad, the “Archbishop” Josef Nuzík presented a “Velehrad Appeal” for “reconciliation and understanding,” supported by the Ecumenical Council of Churches in the Czech Republic. The text calls for “respect one another even if they think differently,” “look for what unites them,” and presents “reconciliation, dialogue, and mutual respect not as a sign of weakness but as a condition for a good future for our country.” This is the heresy of ecumenism solemnly condemned by Pius XI in Mortalium Animos (1928) and by the Holy Office under Pius XII. The Syllabus anathematizes the idea that “the Church ought to be separated from the State” (Error 55) and that “national churches, withdrawn from the authority of the Roman pontiff… can be established” (Error 37). By joining with heretical and schismatic bodies in a common “appeal,” the conciliar hierarchy commits communicatio in sacris and implicitly denies Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus. As Pius XI taught: “The Church of Christ… cannot be the object of a divided worship… This union can only arise from the return of the dissidents to the one true Church of Christ” (Mortalium Animos, §10). The “Appeal” seeks a “good future for our country” — a purely temporal, naturalistic end — while ignoring the ultima ratio of the Judicium Universale.
Liturgical Trivialization and the “Pilgrimage Route”
The article notes the unveiling of a “milestone marker on the Sts. Cyril and Methodius pilgrimage route, which crosses Europe” and a “national record when 32 people named after the saints gathered in one place. Each received a T-shirt reading ‘I am Cyril’ or ‘I am Methodius.'” This sacrilegious buffoonery reduces the sancta to marketing props. The Council of Trent anathematizes those who treat sacred things with irreverence (Sess. XXII, can. 7). The “concert by church choirs” and the opening of the “bishop’s palace to visitors” complete the transformation of the House of God into a den of thieves (Mt 21:13), a museum of naturalistic culture devoid of the Sacrifice of the Mass — which, in the Novus Ordo rite used here, has been stripped of its propitiatory nature and turned into a “table of assembly” (Institutio Generalis Missalis Romani, 1969, §7).
The Theological Bankruptcy of the “Homilies”
Bishop Pavel Konzbul quotes a “contemporary American journalist” on reading habits and cites St. Augustine on silence, yet nowhere mentions the necessity of Faith, the Sacraments, or the State of Grace. He speaks of “individualism reinforced by social media,” “crisis of values and meaning,” and “freedom must be defended” — purely sociological categories. Lamentabili Sane Exitu condemned the Modernist proposition that “Faith, as assent of the mind, is ultimately based on a sum of probabilities” (Prop. 25) and that “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (Prop. 26). Konzbul’s “fear need not paralyze… turned into a driving force” is a stoic self-help mantra, not the timor Domini initium sapientiae (Ps 110:10). The “Cardinal” Nemet’s emphasis on “how we live, how we love” without reference to caritas infusa and the mandatum novum (Jn 13:34) rooted in the Sacrifice of the Cross is Pelagian moralism.
The Sedevacantist Verdict: A Sect of the Antichrist
The entire spectacle — the “pope” Leo XIV (a manifest heretic who, by Cum ex Apostolatus Officio and Canon 188.4, lost all jurisdiction ipso facto), the “cardinals” and “bishops” ordained in the invalid Pontificale Romanum of 1968, the politicians, the ecumenical heretics — constitutes the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Mt 24:15). As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member” (De Romano Pontifice, II, 30). The Defense of Sedevacantism file confirms: “A Pope-manifest heretic loses his office automatically… by notorious and publicly manifested heresy, the Roman Pontiff… is deprived ipso facto of his personal jurisdiction even before any declaratory sentence.” The “blessing” of Leo XIV is null, void, and of no effect. The “Masses” in Nitra and Velehrad are idolatrous simulations. The faithful who kneel before these “prelates” worship a false christ (Mt 24:24).
Quas Primas declared: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken” (§25). Today’s celebrations in Slovakia and Czechia are the rotten fruit of that removal. The conciliar sect offers not the Regnum Christi but a regnum hominis — a Masonic parody of Catholicism. Return to the immutable Tradition. Reject the usurpers. Uphold the Social Kingship of Christ the King.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV blesses Slovak pilgrimage as thousands mark Sts. Cyril and Methodius feast (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 06.07.2026