The EWTN News portal reports that on July 8, 2026, the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) dispatched a message via his Secretary of State, “Cardinal” Pietro Parolin, to the United Nations’ “AI for Good Global Summit” in Geneva. The letter invokes his recent encyclical Magnifica Humanitas (May 26, 2026) to justify the conciliar sect’s collaboration with the Masonic world government, framing the engagement as a defense of “human dignity” and a response to “troubling accounts of the potential misuses of algorithms.” This spectacle is not a pastoral act but a public act of treason against the Social Kingship of Christ, confirming the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican as the abomination of desolation foretold by Daniel and Christ.
The Usurper’s Encyclical: A Modernist Manifesto for the New World Order
The very title Magnifica Humanitas — “Magnificent Humanity” — betrays the anthropocentric inversion at the heart of the conciliar revolution. Where Pius XI, in Quas Primas, proclaimed that “the hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior,” the antipope Leo XIV offers the United Nations a treatise on algorithms. The article states the encyclical was born of “conversations on AI with scientists, political leaders, and parents.” Not a word of Christ the King, the necessity of sanctifying grace, the reality of original sin, or the eternal destiny of souls. This is the cult of man condemned by St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis as the “synthesis of all heresies”: Modernism. The “human dignity” invoked is the Masonic dignité de l’homme — the dignity of the rebel Adam, not the dignity of the adopted son of God in sanctifying grace.
Dialogue with the “Synagogue of Satan”: The UN as Masonic Instrument
Pius IX, in the Syllabus of Errors (1864), condemned the proposition that “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). He identified the sects — “whether they be called masonic or bear another name” — as the “synagogue of Satan, which gathers its troops against the Church of Christ.” The “AI for Good Global Summit” is a creature of this very Masonic infrastructure: the United Nations, an organization founded on the Declaration of Human Rights (1948), a document dripping with the laicism Pius XI denounced in Quas Primas as “the plague that poisons human society.” By sending a message to be read at this summit, the antipope publicly acknowledges the legitimacy of the civitas terrena organized in rebellion against God. He does not call the UN to convert and submit to Christ the King; he asks for a seat at their table. This is treason against the Kingship of Christ.
The “Holy See” Permanent Observer: Diplomatic Recognition of the Anti-Church
The article notes the “Permanent Observer Mission of the Holy See to the U.N. in Geneva has also participated in the summit.” This “Holy See” is not the Roman Pontificate instituted by Christ, but the diplomatic apparatus of the neo-church, recognized by the Masonic powers precisely because it has abdicated the potestas jurisdictionis over souls in temporal matters. Leo XIII, in Annum Sacrum (1899), cited by Pius XI in Quas Primas, taught that Christ’s reign “encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The conciliar sect’s “Permanent Observer” status is a practical denial of this truth: it accepts subordination to the civitas diaboli. The “Cardinal” Parolin, as Secretary of State of a vacant See, acts as a functionary of the paramasonic structure, not a Prince of the Church.
AI as the New Tower of Babel: Naturalism Masquerading as Morality
The article’s focus on “human agency,” “oversight,” and “misuse of algorithms” reveals a purely naturalistic anthropology. The conciliar sect has nothing to say about the supernatural order because it no longer believes in it. The “loss of human agency” is lamented not because man is made ad imaginem Dei and destined for the visio beatifica, but because autonomous man is the idol of the new religion. St. Pius X, in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907), condemned the Modernist proposition that “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement” (Prop. 59). The antipope’s “AI ethics” is precisely this: a vague, evolving “movement” adapted to the “signs of the times,” replacing the immutable Lex Aeterna and the Decalogue. The “encyclical” is not a Magisterial act binding consciences in foro interno et externo; it is a policy paper for the New World Order.
The Vacant See and the Canonical Impossibility of the Act
As demonstrated by the theological consensus of St. Robert Bellarmine, John of St. Thomas, and the 1917 Code (Canon 188.4), a manifest heretic loses the papacy ipso facto, without any declaration. The line of usurpers beginning with John XXIII (Angelo Roncalli) — all of whom have publicly professed the heresies of religious liberty, false ecumenism, and collegiality condemned by the Syllabus, Quas Primas, Pascendi, and Vatican I — are not Popes. They are antipopes. Robert Prevost (“Leo XIV”), by his participation in the conciliar sect’s magisterium and his public adhesion to the Second Vatican Council, is a manifest heretic. He holds no jurisdiction. His “encyclical” has zero canonical weight. His message to the UN is the private opinion of a layman (or at best a priest of doubtful orders) usurping the Chair of Peter. The faithful are bound by Canon 188.4 and the Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio of Paul IV to regard his acts as “null, void, and of no effect.”
EWTN: Propaganda Arm of the Neo-Church
The source, EWTN News, functions as the Pravda of the conciliar sect. It reports the antipope’s actions as if they were legitimate papal acts, using honorifics (“pontiff,” “Holy See,” “Cardinal”) that objectively blaspheme the true hierarchy. The article’s tone — bureaucratic, optimistic, focused on “dialogue” and “governance” — is the linguistic signature of the Church of the New Advent: no Cross, no sin, no Hell, no Christ the King. It is the “language of the world” (1 John 4:5) spoken by those who are “of the world.”
The Only Remedy: The Social Kingship of Christ the King
Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely “to address the needs of the present times and provide a special remedy against the plague that poisons human society. And this plague is the secularism of our times, so-called laicism.” The antipope’s UN engagement is the plague. The only solution to the dangers of AI — or any technology — is the restoration of all things in Christ (Instaurare omnia in Christo): the conversion of nations to the Catholic Faith, the subordination of civil laws to the Lex Divina, the recognition of the Rights of God over the “rights of man,” and the reign of the Sacred Heart in parliaments and algorithms alike. There is no “Catholic AI ethics” apart from the Catholic State subordinated to Christ the King. The conciliar sect’s collaboration with the UN is the whore of Babylon riding the beast (Apoc. 17:3). True Catholics, adhering to the Sede Vacante and the immutable Tradition, must reject this theater entirely and work for the Restoration.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV tells UN: Confront AI misuse to promote human dignity (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 08.07.2026