Antipope’s Envoy Boasts of Diplomatic Triumphs While Christ’s Kingship Over Nations Is Erased

The National Catholic Register (CNA) portal reports that the apostolic nuncio to Great Britain, Archbishop Miguel Maury Buendía, predicts a visit by the usurper “Pope Leo XIV” (Robert Prevost) to England as “likely, desirable, and unavoidable,” framing it as a reciprocal diplomatic gesture after King Charles III’s state visit to the Vatican. The nuncio claims this visit would “awaken the conscience of the West” just as the false “St. John Paul II” allegedly stirred the East, citing a supposed “quiet Christian revival” among younger generations fueled by immigration. The cited article relates the nuncio’s four-decade career in the Vatican’s diplomatic service, his experiences in post-communist Central Asia and Rwanda, and his view that Holy See diplomacy prioritizes “the spiritual dimension of the human person” and “human rights.” This report exposes the neo-church’s total reduction of the Divine Mission to a naturalistic, Masonic diplomatic enterprise, utterly devoid of the supernatural mandate to establish the Social Kingship of Christ over all nations.


The Antichurch’s Diplomatic Corps: A Masonic Parody of the Papal Primacy

The very concept of a “nuncio” representing the usurper “Leo XIV” to the United Kingdom is a crime of lese-majesty against Christ the King. As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas, “the Church, established by Christ as a perfect society, demands for itself by a right belonging to it, which it cannot renounce, full freedom and independence from secular authority.” The neo-church’s diplomatic service, however, operates as a paramasonic structure fully integrated into the secular order, negotiating “reciprocal visits” with a Protestant monarch who is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England — a heretical sect founded on the rejection of papal supremacy. The Syllabus of Errors (Pius IX) condemns the proposition that “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55), yet the conciliar sect inverts this: it subordinates the Church to the State via diplomatic protocol, treating the Kingship of Christ as a matter of courtesy calls and “amplified messages” in the “English-speaking world.”

Mr. Maury Buendía’s boast — “The Holy See has no oranges to sell and no oil to buy” — is a blasphemous trivialization of the papal office. The Vicar of Christ (were there a true one) does not engage in “diplomacy” as a sovereign among sovereigns; he exercises potestas iurisdictionis over all baptized souls and potestas indirecta in temporal matters pertaining to salvation. The 1917 Code (Canon 188.4), cited in the Defense of Sedevacantism, declares that a cleric who “publicly defects from the Catholic faith” vacates his office ipso facto. Mr. Maury Buendía, ordained in 1980 under the invalid Pontificale Romanum of Paul VI, has spent 39 years serving a line of manifest heretics (John XXIII through “Leo XIV”), thereby defecting from the Faith by public adhesion to the conciliar apostasy. His “diplomatic service” is not a mission of the Church but a career in the synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2:9) that occupies the Vatican.

Linguistic Engineering: “Human Rights” Replace the Rights of God

The nuncio’s vocabulary is a lexicon of Modernism, stripped of all supernatural density. He speaks of “the spiritual dimension of the human person,” “raising awareness… of the need and benefit of respecting and promoting human rights,” and “convergence of interests” between the Holy See and civil states. This is the language of the Declaration on Religious Liberty (Dignitatis Humanae), condemned by the Syllabus (Error 15: “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which… he shall consider true”) and by Quas Primas, which demands that “rulers of states… fulfill this duty themselves and with their people, if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate and contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness” — a duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him, not to negotiate “human rights” frameworks.

The phrase “awaken the conscience of the West” is a direct plagiarism of the Fatima Masonic script. The False Fatima Apparitions file demonstrates that the “conversion of Russia” narrative was a psychological operation to divert attention from the internal apostasy (Modernism) by focusing on an external enemy (Communism). Mr. Maury Buendía replicates this script: he praises the Catholic minority in Central Asia for preserving the faith “thanks to the daily family rosary” — a pious distraction from the fact that the “Muslim majority and millions of Russian Orthodox believers abandoned their faith” under a system the neo-church now dialogues with (Assisi 1986, Abu Dhabi 2019). The “quiet Christian revival” in the UK attributed to “immigrants and children of immigrants” is demographic replacement theology, not supernatural regeneration. Quas Primas warns: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” Importing bodies into empty pews does not restore the Reign of Christ; it merely populates a naturalistic NGO.

Theological Bankruptcy: A “Pope” for the English-Speaking World, Not the King of Kings

The nuncio’s glee over the “first English-speaking pope in more than eight centuries” reveals the nationalist, horizontalist ecclesiology of the conciliar sect. Pius XI, citing Daniel 7:14, teaches that Christ received “power, and honor, and a kingdom: and all peoples, tribes, and tongues shall serve him.” The neo-church, by contrast, markets its usurper as a linguistic commodity: “his message amplified throughout the English-speaking world.” This is the heresy of Americanism (condemned by Leo XIII, Testem Benevolentiae) elevated to papal policy: the Faith is reduced to a “message” tailored for a language market.

Furthermore, the nuncio invokes the false “St. John Paul II” as the model for “Leo XIV” — the very heretic who kissed the Quran, presided over Assisi, and declared the “Holy Spirit” active in false religions. Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 54) condemns the Modernist error: “Dogmas, sacraments, and hierarchy… are merely modes of explanation and stages in the evolution of Christian consciousness.” The “two lungs” metaphor (East/West) used by the nuncio is ecumenical heresy: it posits the schismatic Orthodoxy as a “lung” of the one Church, denying Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus. The False Fatima Apparitions file correctly identifies this as “ecumenism project… legitimizing dialogue with schismatic Orthodoxy.”

Symptomatic Analysis: The Rwanda Alibi and the “Diplomacy of Presence”

Mr. Maury Buendía’s recounting of his Rwanda service — “I truly feared that a stray bullet might hit me… I still have one that came through my bedroom” — functions as a hagiographic alibi for the neo-church’s diplomatic corps. It mimics the martyrdom narrative to legitimize a structure that abandoned the Catholic Faith at Vatican II. The nuncio admits: “Civil wars are the most horrific because they are driven by hatred, even though they are often provoked and fueled by outside interests.” Yet he serves a “pope” who, as “Francis,” praised the UN’s “responsibility to protect” doctrine — the very “outside interest” manipulation he decries. The Syllabus (Error 39) condemns: “The State… is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.” The neo-church’s diplomacy submits to this unlimited State, seeking only a “place at the table” for “human rights” talk.

The nuncio’s complaint that “excessive emphasis on security concerns has unfortunately had the effect of distancing the pontiff from the faithful” is a crocodile tear. The “pontiff” he serves is an antipope; the “faithful” are largely apostates attending a Protestantized meal (Novus Ordo) that Lamentabili (Prop. 45) condemns as a denial of the historical institution of the Eucharist by Christ. The “lasting impact” of papal trips is measured by “whether it responds to the expectations and historical circumstances of the countries he visits” — pure pragmatism, the criterion of truth condemned by St. Pius X in Pascendi: “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him” (Lamentabili, Prop. 58).

The “Conversion” That Is Not Conversion: Immigration as Ecclesial Strategy

The nuncio’s claim that “religious practice is increasing among Catholics, thanks in part to the thousands of immigrants… revitalizing parish life” exposes the naturalistic ecclesiology of the conciliar sect. Quas Primas teaches that men enter Christ’s Kingdom “through faith and baptism, which… signifies and brings about an internal rebirth.” The neo-church counts bodies in pews — statistical resurrection — while the Syllabus (Error 48) condemns approving “the system of educating youth unconnected with Catholic faith.” These immigrants, often from cultures where Catholicism is cultural habit rather than supernatural conviction, are fed a Modernist liturgy and catechesis that denies the very dogmas (Trent, Vatican I) their ancestors held. This is not “revival”; it is the final phase of the Masonic operation described in False Fatima Apparitions: “Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” The “Third Secret” of the true Church is the loss of the Faith in Rome (La Salette, authentic), which the neo-church conceals by canonizing its architects.

Conclusion: The Nuncio of the Abomination of Desolation

Archbishop Maury Buendía is not a nuncio of the Catholic Church. He is a functionary of the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican, ordained in a rite of doubtful validity, serving a line of usurpers who have ipso facto lost all jurisdiction by manifest heresy (Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice; Canon 188.4; Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). His “diplomacy” is the whoredom of the Great Harlot (Apoc. 17:2) with the kings of the earth. The predicted visit of “Leo XIV” to Great Britain would not “awaken the conscience of the West” but seal its condemnation: a false pope blessing a Protestant kingdom, both united in the Masonic project of a “fraternal” world without the Kingship of Christ. Quas Primas thunders: “Christ… will very severely avenge these insults, because His royal dignity demands that all relations in the state be ordered on the basis of God’s commandments.” The neo-church’s diplomacy orders relations on the basis of human rights, dialogue, and reciprocal visits. Non est hic Deus — God is not here.


Source:
Papal Nuncio to Great Britain: A Visit From Pope Leo Is ‘Likely’
  (ncregister.com)
Date: 13.07.2026

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Antichurch.org
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.