The NCR portal reports that the usurper Robert Prevost, styling himself “Pope” Leo XIV, accepted the resignation of the conciliar “bishop” Antonio Santarsiero Rosa of Huacho, Peru, effective July 15, 2026, coinciding with the latter’s 75th birthday. The maneuver comes scarcely three months after the Spanish outlet InfoVaticana exposed a dossier detailing allegations of sexual abuse and psychological torture spanning years, including the abuse of a minor. The conciliar “Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith” and the Peruvian nunciature received the documentation in April; the “bishop” denied the charges, the Peruvian “Bishops’ Conference” invoked its “protocols” and the Bergoglian motu proprio Vos Estis Lux Mundi, and the antipope responded with a bureaucratic acceptance of a resignation mandated by the 1983 Code. This sordid theater exposes the conciliar sect’s institutionalized impunity and the utter nullity of its disciplinary apparatus.
The Usurper’s Simulated Jurisdiction: A Null Act From a Vacant See
The very premise of the report—that a “pope” can “accept” a “resignation”—presumes a jurisdiction that does not exist. The See of Peter has been vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958. The line of claimants beginning with John XXIII are manifest heretics who, by the very fact of their public adhesion to the conciliar apostasy (religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality, the New Mass), lost all canonical office ipso facto without need of any declaration. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches in De Romano Pontifice: “A Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio of Pope Paul IV confirms that the promotion of a heretic “shall be null, void, and of no effect.” Robert Prevost, a lifelong servant of the conciliar revolution, is a public heretic; his “acceptance” of a resignation is a nullity, a theatrical gesture by a private individual usurping the Chair of Peter.
The 1983 Code: A Modernist Fabrication Replacing Divine Law
The article cites the “Code of Canon Law” requiring resignation at 75. This refers to the 1983 Code, a product of the conciliar apostasy, which abolished the 1917 Code—the last legitimate universal legislation of the Church. Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code provides that an office becomes vacant ipso facto by “public defection from the Catholic faith.” It knows nothing of an age limit, a modernist innovation designed to facilitate the turnover of personnel in the neo-church’s bureaucratic machine. The 1983 Code is not law; it is a revolutionary statute of a schismatic sect. To cite it as binding is to legitimize the usurpation. As the Syllabus of Pius IX condemns: “The Church is not a true and perfect society… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church” (Error 19). The conciliar “canon law” is the positive law of a counterfeit church, engineered to manage its own dissolution.
The “Bishop” Santarsiero: A Functionary of the Neo-Church, Not a Successor of the Apostles
Antonio Santarsiero Rosa received “episcopal ordination” in 2001 under the Paul VI rite, a rite stripped of the essential form and intention for the transmission of the sacerdotal character and episcopal power, as demonstrated by the catastrophic defects in the new ordinal. Even if the rite were valid, his consecration by the conciliar “archbishop” Liénart (a documented Freemason) and his lifelong service to the conciliar hierarchy render him a participant in the great apostasy. He is not a bishop of the Catholic Church; he is a functionary of the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican. The “Diocese of Huacho” is a territorial fiction administered by the neo-church. His “resignation” is merely the reassignment of a corporate manager. The faithful of Huacho have no true pastor, no valid Mass, no valid sacraments—only the abomination of desolation foretold by Daniel and Our Lord.
The Abuse Crisis: Fruit of the Conciliar Revolution’s Destruction of the Priesthood
The allegations against Santarsiero—sexual abuse, psychological torture, corruption of a minor—are the bitter but inevitable fruit of the conciliar “renewal.” The destruction of the traditional seminary system, the introduction of psychology and “human formation” in place of Thomistic philosophy and ascetical theology, the abolition of the minor orders and the subdiaconate, the promotion of a “priesthood of the people of God” that blurs the ontological distinction between priest and layman—all this created the moral vacuum in which predators thrive. The “protocols” and “listening channels” cited by the Peruvian “Bishops’ Conference” are secular managerial tools, utterly incapable of addressing sin. The only remedy for clerical concupiscence is the sacrament of Penance administered by a valid priest, the Most Holy Sacrifice offered in the Tridentine Rite, and the rigorous discipline of the 1917 Code—precisely what the conciliar sect has abolished.
Vos Estis Lux Mundi: A Cover-Up Mechanism Masquerading as Reform
The article notes the “listening channels established by the motu proprio Vos Estis Lux Mundi.” This Bergoglian document is a masterpiece of legalistic obfuscation. It creates a “metropolitan” reporting structure that bypasses the Roman Pontiff (the true one) and empowers conciliar “metropolitans”—themselves often compromised—to investigate their peers. It treats crimes against the Sixth Commandment as administrative infractions to be “managed,” not as sins crying to heaven for vengeance requiring canonical penalties (deposition, degradation, handover to the secular arm). It is a tool of the Masonic infiltration to protect the network, not the victims. As Pope St. Pius X condemned in Pascendi Dominici Gregis, the Modernist “does not deny, but reinterprets”—here, reinterpreting justice as bureaucratic process.
The Peruvian “Episcopate”: A Collegialist Chimera With No Canonical Standing
The “Peruvian Bishops’ Conference” (CEP) issued a statement affirming “confidence in the canonical penal system.” This body is a manifestation of the heresy of collegiality, condemned implicitly by Vatican I’s definition of papal primacy and explicitly by Pius XII in Mystici Corporis. Bishops derive their mission from the Roman Pontiff, not from a national conference. The CEP has no legislative, judicial, or coercive power in the true Church. Its “secretary-general” Santarsiero was an administrator of a schismatic structure. Its statement is the press release of a neo-church NGO, not an act of ecclesiastical authority.
Conclusion: Only the Restoration of the True Hierarchy Can Purge This Filth
The entire spectacle—the abuse, the denial, the “resignation,” the antipope’s rubber stamp, the conference’s platitudes—is a symptom of the sede vacante and the Great Apostasy foretold by St. Paul (2 Thess 2:3). The structures occupying the Vatican are the Church of the New Advent, the synagogue of Satan (Apoc 2:9) prophesied by Pius IX in the Syllabus. They possess no jurisdiction, no sacraments, no authority to bind or loose. The faithful in Peru and worldwide must reject these counterfeit shepherds, adhere to the immutable Tradition preserved by true bishops and priests holding the Tradition of the Fathers, and pray for the restoration of a true Pope who will confirm his brethren (Luke 22:32) and drive the money-changers from the Temple. Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus imperat.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV Accepts Resignation of Peruvian Bishop Accused of Sexual Abuse (ncregister.com)
Date: 16.07.2026