The National Catholic Register portal (July 24, 2026) reports that the Vatican’s Secretary for Relations with States, “Archbishop” Paul Richard Gallagher, completed a six-day mission to Ukraine to evaluate conditions for a potential visit by the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost). The mission included meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, participation in celebrations at the Marian shrine of Berdychiv marking the “restoration” of Latin structures, and coordination with “Cardinal” Matteo Zuppi’s humanitarian efforts for prisoner exchanges and the return of children. “Archbishop” Gallagher emphasized the “Holy See’s” commitment to dialogue, humanitarian aid, and a “just and lasting peace,” even invoking the possibility of a “miracle” at Berdychiv. This diplomatic theater exposes the total substitution of the Church’s divine mandate for the social reign of Christ the King with a naturalistic, Masonic humanitarianism that serves the geopolitical interests of the neo-church’s globalist masters.
The Usurper’s Diplomacy: A Denial of Christ’s Social Kingship
The cited article revolves entirely around the movements of a manifest heretic, Robert Prevost, who occupies the Chair of Peter de facto but has forfeited it de jure by his adherence to the conciliar apostasy. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches, “a Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church” (De Romano Pontifice). The “Defense of Sedevacantism” file confirms that “a manifest heretic cannot be Pope. It cannot be objected that the character remains in him, because if he remained Pope because of the character, since it is indelible, he could never be deposed.” Therefore, every “papal trip,” every “encyclical,” every “canonization” by this line of usurpers beginning with John XXIII is null, void, and of no effect, a mere spectacle of the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt. 24:15).
The article notes that Zelenskyy “expressed gratitude for the Holy See’s continuing support” and feels “supported by the closeness shown first by Pope Francis and now by Pope Leo.” This is the supreme indictment: the enemies of Christ’s Kingship—secular leaders waging war for geopolitical dominance—find consolation in the “pope” of the neo-church. Pius XI, in Quas Primas, thundered that “when God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The “Holy See” described in this article derives its authority entirely from the recognition of secular powers (Zelenskyy, Putin, the UN), not from the divine mandate to teach all nations (Matt. 28:19) and subject them to the sweet yoke of Christ (Matt. 11:30). This is the laicism condemned by Pius XI as the “plague that poisons human society.”
Humanitarianism as a Counterfeit Gospel
The core of the “mission” is humanitarian: “prisoner exchanges,” “return of Ukrainian children,” “delivery of humanitarian assistance,” “humanitarian corridor.” Nowhere is there mention of the salus animarum, the conversion of Russia or Ukraine to the Catholic Faith, the restoration of the Social Kingship of Christ, or the condemnation of the schismatic Orthodox hierarchy that blesses Russian arms. The “Cardinal” Zuppi is described as a “special envoy” for “humanitarian efforts, such as the mission entrusted to Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi, who continues working for the return of children, prisoners and civilians.”
This is the heresy of actionism condemned by St. Pius X in Pascendi Dominici Gregis and the Syllabus of Modernist errors in Lamentabili Sane Exitu: “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (Lamentabili, Prop. 26). The neo-church has reduced the Missio Dei to NGO work. It fulfills the prophecy of the “False Fatima” file: “The efficacy of Holy Mass is diminished in favor of spectacular acts… The idea of ‘national conversion without evangelization’ contradicts Catholic ecclesiology.” The “conversion of Russia” promised by the Fatima deception is here realized in its Masonic form: a geopolitical settlement brokered by a false pope, devoid of the baptism of fire (Matt. 3:11) which is the only true conversion.
The Marian Trap: Berdychiv and the Fatima Deception
The article highlights the “principal purpose” of the visit: celebrations at the “Marian shrine of Berdychiv… renowned for many reported healings.” “Archbishop” Gallagher explicitly invokes this shrine’s history to suggest “we should never rule out the possibility of a miracle.” This is the operational core of the Masonic “Fatima” psychological operation detailed in the context file. The “False Fatima” document demonstrates that “The name ‘Fatima’: a symbol of Christian-Islamic syncretism” and that the “Miracle of the Sun” was “mass optical manipulation (natural phenomenon) and mass panic and autosuggestion.”
Berdychiv functions identically: a center of supernaturalized naturalism where crowds are gathered not for the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary offered in the True Mass, but for spectacular acts and reported healings that bypass the Church’s sacramental economy. By anchoring his diplomatic mission in this shrine, Gallagher signals the ecumenical, interreligious nature of the neo-church’s “peace”—a peace built on phenomena rather than dogma, on emotion rather than faith. The “False Fatima” file concludes: “The Fatima message: Theologically contradictory to Catholic doctrine. A tool to divert attention from modernism. A potential Masonic ‘psychological operation’ against the Church.” Berdychiv is the Ukrainian node of this same operation.
Dialogue with the World: Betrayal of the Syllabus
Gallagher speaks of the “Holy See’s” commitment to “renew its commitment to dialogue with the international community and with the Russian authorities.” This single phrase encapsulates the entirety of the post-conciliar apostasy. Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864) infallibly condemns the proposition: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). It condemns: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55), and “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship” (Error 77).
The “Vatican” described in the article operates exclusively within this condemned framework. It “dialogues” with the Russian authorities (schismatic, KGB-infiltrated) and the “international community” (Masonic UN/WEF structure) as an equal partner in humanitarian management. It has abdicated the jus gladii of the spiritual sword—the duty to condemn error, to excommunicate heretics and schismatics, to demand the public profession of the Catholic Faith by states—for a seat at the table of the synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2:9). As Pius IX wrote in the allocution attached to the Syllabus: “It is from them that the synagogue of Satan, which gathers its troops against the Church of Christ, takes its strength.” The neo-church is the visible collaboration with that synagogue.
The Zuppi Mission: Masonic Humanitarianism
The article details “Cardinal” Zuppi’s mission: “prisoner exchanges,” “return of Ukrainian children taken to Russia,” “protection of the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra (UNESCO World Heritage Site).” Note the secular language: “UNESCO World Heritage Site,” “humanitarian corridor,” “civilians detained.” There is zero supernatural vocabulary. The Lavra is not defended as a bastion of Orthodoxy to be converted, nor as a Catholic shrine to be reclaimed, but as a cultural artifact of “humanity.” This is the natural religion condemned by the Syllabus (Error 79) and by Pius XI in Quas Primas: “further still went those who conceived that the divine religion should be replaced by a natural religion, a natural inner impulse.”
Zuppi acts as the de facto foreign minister of a paramasonic structure. His “humanitarianism” is the counterfeit charity of the Antichrist, feeding the body while poisoning the soul with the lie that salvation can be found in “dialogue” and “peace accords” brokered by heretics. St. Cyprian teaches: “He cannot have God for his Father who has not the Church for his Mother.” The neo-church offers the world a mother who has prostituted herself to the kings of the earth (Apoc. 17:2).
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation in Action
This article is not a report on a papal trip; it is a chronicle of the Great Apostasy (2 Thess. 2:3) in its operational phase. The usurper “Leo XIV” sends his envoys to manage the geopolitical fallout of a war between two Godless powers (schismatic Russia, secularist Ukraine/West), using Marian shrines as photo-op backdrops for a “peace” that explicitly excludes the Prince of Peace (Isa. 9:6). Pius XI declared: “Peace is only possible in the kingdom of Christ.” (Quas Primas). The neo-church offers the world a pax romana without Christ, a civitas terrena without the civitas Dei.
Every “papal trip,” every “humanitarian mission,” every “dialogue” of this counterfeit hierarchy is a blow struck against the Social Kingship of Christ and a confirmation of the vacancy of the Holy See. The true Church remains where it has always been: in the catacombs of Tradition, among the bishops and priests who preserve the Traditio intact, offering the True Mass, teaching the integral Faith, and awaiting the Parousia or the miraculous restoration of the Papacy by God’s hand alone. Non praevalebunt (Matt. 16:18). The gates of hell—whether they bear the name of Kremlin, NATO, or the “Vatican” of the New Advent—shall not prevail.
Source:
Vatican Weighs Papal Trip to Ukraine (ncregister.com)
Date: 24.07.2026