The Vatican News portal, propaganda organ of the conciliar sect occupying the Vatican, reports that the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) granted an interview to the American broadcaster NBC, followed by another to Telemundo, praising the United States’ “sense of freedom,” “welcome of all people,” and “opportunity,” while advocating a naturalistic humanitarianism centered on “peace,” “brotherhood,” and the “richness of being human” divorced from the Social Kingship of Christ the King. This interview constitutes a formal manifestation of the apostasy of the neo-church, reducing the Petrine ministry to a mouthpiece for Masonic liberalism and the religion of humanity.
The Usurper on the Throne: A Manifest Heretic Without Jurisdiction
Before dissecting the specific errors uttered by Robert Prevost, one must establish the ontological reality: he is not the Pope. As a manifest adherent of the Modernist synthesis condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu and Pascendi Dominici Gregis (1907), and as a promoter of the false ecumenism, religious liberty, and collegiality of the Second Vatican Council — which are heresies against the Divine Constitution of the Church — he has ipso facto lost all jurisdiction by the very fact of his public defection from the Catholic Faith (Canon 188 §4, 1917 Code; Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Pope Paul IV). St. Robert Bellarmine teaches with unanimous patristic consensus: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church” (De Romano Pontifice, Bk. 2, Ch. 30). The “interview” is therefore not the voice of the Vicar of Christ, but the propaganda of a layman heading a paramasonic structure, the “Church of the New Advent,” the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt. 24:15).
Americanism and the Condemned Error of “Liberty”
The usurper declares:
“I love America’s sense of freedom and welcome of all people… the principles of what America stands for, the sense of freedom, the sense of opportunity, the sense of having invited, for generations, people from around the world to be part of America.”
This is the heresy of Americanism, condemned implicitly by Leo XIII in Testem Benevolentiae (1899) and explicitly rooted in the errors anathematized by Pius IX in the Syllabus (1864). Proposition 77 condemns: “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship.” Proposition 79 condemns the lie that “the civil liberty of every form of worship… conduce more easily to corrupt the morals and minds of the people, and to propagate the pest of indifferentism.” Proposition 80 condemns the idea that “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.”
Prevost’s praise of “freedom” — the liberalism of the Enlightenment — is a direct spit in the face of the Immaculate Conception’s definition of the Church’s immunity from error. He celebrates the novus ordo seclorum, the Masonic order of the ages, which Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) identified as the “plague… so-called laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors” that began with “the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations.” To call this “freedom” a “wealth” of the United States is to call darkness light and bitter sweet (Is. 5:20). The “welcome of all people” without distinction of creed, without the duty of conversion to the una salus of the Catholic Church, is the indifferentism condemned in Syllabus props. 15, 16, 17, 18.
Naturalistic Humanism: The “Religion of Humanity” Replaces the Kingship of Christ
In the Telemundo interview, the usurper speaks the language of the Masonic lodges:
“That beauty… was an invitation to all of us to look beyond and see the beauty that can be created… when we set aside some of our differences and recognize the richness of being human, of all having been created in the image of God… We need to rediscover the values and the treasure found in being human, in all being brothers and sisters… We must recognize that we can all truly participate in a society that loves peace, seeks peace, and accepts one another despite our differences.”
Here lies the theological bankruptcy of the conciliar sect. The phrase “set aside our differences” is the watchword of false ecumenism: it demands the silence of dogmatic truth (the differences being the Divinity of Christ, the necessity of the Church, the Sacraments, the Papacy) for the sake of a naturalistic “brotherhood.” St. Pius X condemned this in Lamentabili (Prop. 58): “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him.” The usurper preaches a fraternité without paternité — brotherhood without the Fatherhood of God in Christ, which is the very definition of the Antichrist’s religion (1 John 2:22-23).
Pius XI, in Quas Primas, thundered against this exact substitution: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” The usurper offers “peace” — pax humana — while ignoring the Pax Christi in Regno Christi. He speaks of the “image of God” (imago Dei) but omits the similitudo Dei restored only by sanctifying grace through Baptism and the Catholic Faith. “There is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12), yet Prevost proposes a “society that loves peace” built on “accepting one another despite differences” — i.e., religious indifferentism, the pest of indifferentism (Syllabus, Prop. 79).
The Silence of the Sacraments, The Cross, and Judgment: The Gravest Accusation
Analyze the omissions. In two interviews, there is zero mention of:
- The Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass (the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary).
- The necessity of Baptism for salvation (extra ecclesiam nulla salus).
- The Social Kingship of Christ the King over nations and laws.
- The reality of sin, the devil, hell, and the Final Judgment.
- The Immaculate Heart of Mary or the Rosary (even the false Fatima narrative is absent, replaced by pure secular humanism).
- The conversion of the United States to the Catholic Faith.
This silence is the signature of the Antichrist. As Pius XI taught: “The Kingdom of Christ… demands its followers not only to renounce earthly riches… but also to deny themselves and carry their cross.” The usurper offers a cross-less, conversion-less, Christ-less “peace.” He speaks to migrants:
“Have hope. Certainly, seek ways to live in an orderly manner… We must therefore learn to live in peace, but we must also have the courage and the hope that always help us all.”
This is Pelagian humanitarianism. “Hope” detached from the theological virtue of Hope (whose object is God and eternal life) is mere worldly optimism. “Live in an orderly manner” is the morality of the Freemason, not the lex Christi. The true pastor would say: “Convert and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins” (Acts 2:38). The false prophet says: “Have hope… live in peace.”
Symptomatic Level: The Fruit of the Conciliar Revolution
This interview is not an anomaly; it is the logical and necessary fruit of Vatican II. The Gaudium et Spes anthropology (“the richness of being human”), the Dignitatis Humanae religious liberty (“freedom,” “welcome of all people”), the Nostra Aetate false ecumenism (“set aside differences,” “brothers and sisters”), and the Gaudium et Spes political messianism (“society that loves peace”) — all converge in the words of Robert Prevost.
The “prayer event for peace with musical accompaniment by Andrea Bocelli and children from around the world” is the liturgy of the civitas terrena, the counter-church of the Antichrist described by the Syllabus (Prop. 55): “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.” Here, the “pope” of the neo-church sanctifies the Masonic State (USA) by blessing its founding myths (immigration, freedom, diversity) and calling them “Gospel values.”
Conclusion: Return to the Integral Faith and the True King
The words of the usurper Leo XIV are ipso facto null, void, and of no effect (Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). They are the ravings of a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” (Matt. 7:15), a “minister of Satan transforming himself into an angel of light” (2 Cor. 11:14-15). The faithful Catholic, adhering to the quod semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus (St. Vincent of Lérins), must reject this diabolical simulacrum entirely.
“Peace is only possible in the Kingdom of Christ.” (Pius XI, Quas Primas)
There is no “peace” in the “brotherhood of man” without the Fatherhood of God in Christ the King. There is no “freedom” in liberalism, only slavery to sin (John 8:34). There is no “welcome” that saves without the porta unica of the Catholic Church. The interview exposes the abomination of desolation for what it is: a humanist NGO with a mitre, serving the Prince of this World. Viva Cristo Rey! Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in praelio.
Source:
Pope Leo: I love America’s sense of freedom and welcome of all people (vaticannews.va)
Date: 30.07.2026