The cited article from the *National Catholic Register* portal (August 4, 2026), authored by the conciliar presbyter Raymond J. de Souza, instrumentalizes the glorious Cristero Rebellion of 1926 — a veritable *crusade* for the Social Kingship of Christ the King — to serve the propaganda of the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican. The article presents the martyrdom of Father Miguel Pro and the *Cristiada* as a mere historical “warning” for “religious freedom,” studiously avoiding the *integral* Catholic truth that the Cristeros died *exclusively* for the rights of *Christ the King* over nations, a doctrine anathematized by the conciliar revolution. The conciliar sect canonizes these martyrs not to honor their *causa*, but to sanitize its own betrayal of that *causa*.
The Antipope’s Canonizations: A Sacrilegious Usurpation of the Keys
The article boasts that “Pope St. John Paul II decided to celebrate the canonization of the Mexican martyrs in the Great Jubilee of 2000.” This single sentence encapsulates the entire fraud of the post-conciliar enterprise. Karol WojtyÅ‚a — the arch-heretic who kissed the Quran, prayed with pagans at Assisi, and declared that the Old Covenant remains salvific — possesses *zero* authority to canonize. As the Bull *Cum ex Apostolatus Officio* of Pope Paul IV teaches, a manifest heretic “cannot be Pope… his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect.” The “canonizations” of the conciliar sect are not acts of the *Magisterium infallibile* but theatrical productions of a *paramasonic structure* seeking to drape its novelty in the purple of martyrdom. The true Mexican martyrs — Cristóbal Magallanes, Miguel Pro, and their companions — confessed *Christ the King* against the Masonic State; the conciliar sect confesses *religious liberty* *with* the Masonic State. To invoke the former to legitimize the latter is a *suprema impostura*.
Religious Liberty: The Heresy That Fueled the Persecution
De Souza writes that the 1917 Mexican Constitution included “explicit limitations on religious liberty,” framing the conflict as a battle for “religious freedom.” This is the language of the *Syllabus of Errors*, condemned by Pope Pius IX. Error 15: “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true.” Error 55: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.” The Cristeros did not die for “religious liberty” — a Masonic chimera — but for the *social reign of Christ the King*, the *jus publicum* of the Church to teach, govern, and sanctify nations. Pope Pius XI, in *Quas Primas* (provided in the context), declares: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… For what we wrote at the beginning of Our Pontificate about the diminishing authority of law and respect for power… ‘When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed’.” The Calles regime was the *logical fruit* of the liberal error that the State is the source of rights (Syllabus, Error 39). The conciliar sect, by embracing *Dignitatis Humanae*, has *capitulated* to the very principle that animated the Cristeros’ executioners.
The Suspension of the Sacraments: A Papal Act, Not a “Strike”
The article describes the Mexican bishops’ suspension of public worship in July 1926 as “analogous to an excommunication” or a “nationwide penalty,” noting it was done “with papal support.” This refers to Pope Pius XI, a true Vicar of Christ. The conciliar “bishops” today — invalidly ordained in the *novus ordo* rite of Paul VI, devoid of sacramental character and jurisdiction — could never enact such a penalty. Their “masses” are *simulacra*; their “sacraments” are *null*. The article’s comparison of the 1926 interdict to a “strike” reveals the naturalistic, syndicalist mentality of the conciliar clergy. A true interdict is a *spiritual weapon* wielded by *jurisdiction* to defend the *rights of God*; the conciliar sect knows only “dialogue” and “accompaniment” with the enemies of Christ. As *Quas Primas* states: “The Church… demands for itself by a right belonging to it, which it cannot renounce, full freedom and independence from secular authority.” The conciliar sect has *renounced* this right *ab initio*.
Guadalupe and the 500th Anniversary: Instrumentalizing the Mother of God
The article opens by noting Catholics “look forward to the upcoming 500th anniversary of the apparitions at Guadalupe in 2031.” The conciliar sect will doubtless use this anniversary to promote its *false ecumenism* and *indifferentism*, presenting Our Lady of Guadalupe as a “bridge” to the *sects* and the *pagan* cultures she crushed. The true Guadalupe is the *Conquistadora* who destroyed the demonic Aztec empire and established the *Catholic Kingdom* in Mexico. The Cristeros cried “¡Viva Cristo Rey! ¡Viva la Virgen de Guadalupe!” as they faced firing squads. The conciliar “clergy” today cry “¡Viva el diálogo! ¡Viva la fraternidad universal!” — the motto of the Masonic *Fraternité*. The article’s silence on the *social kingship* of Christ, the *doctrinal cause* of the Cristeros, is not an omission; it is a *deliberate suppression* of the *only* truth that makes their martyrdom intelligible.
Father Pro and the “Blessed” of the Antichurch
The article highlights “Blessed Miguel AgustÃn Pro… beatified in 1988.” Beatified by whom? By the same antipope who “canonized” the Ulma family (unbaptized infant included), the Modernist Newman, the Jansenist Faustina Kowalska (whose *Diary* was on the *Index*), and the Freemason Kolbe. These “beatifications” are *nulla et irrita*. Father Pro died a *true martyr* for the Faith — *in odium fidei* — at the hands of Masonic Calles. His crown was won *before* the conciliar apostasy. The conciliar sect’s “recognition” adds nothing to his glory; it only exposes the sect’s need to *plunder* the Treasury of the True Church to adorn its own nakedness. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches (cited in the *Defense of Sedevacantism* context): “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member.” WojtyÅ‚a, Ratzinger, Bergoglio, Prevost — none are members of the Church; therefore, none can *judge* sanctity.
The “Warning” for Today: Conversion, Not “Vigilance”
De Souza concludes: “Horrors are possible in our time, and in places not far away.” True. But the *remedy* is not the conciliar “vigilance” for “religious freedom.” The *Syllabus* condemns the idea that “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). The *only* remedy is the one Pius XI proclaimed in *Quas Primas*: “If men were ever to recognize Christ’s royal authority over themselves, both privately and publicly, then unheard-of blessings would flow upon the whole society.” The Cristero Rebellion was the *last great Catholic uprising* against the Masonic World Order. The conciliar sect is the *internal occupation* of that Order within the visible structures of the Church. To read the *Cristiada* through the lens of the *National Catholic Register* is to read the *Acts of the Martyrs* through the lens of the *Sanhedrin*.
Conclusion: The Conciliar Sect is the Heir of Calles, Not of the Cristeros
The article is a masterpiece of *conciliar duplicity*. It venerates the *victims* of Masonic persecution while serving the *victors* of the Masonic conquest of the Church. The Cristeros fought against a State that separated Church and State; the conciliar sect *institutionalized* that separation at Vatican II (*Gaudium et Spes*, *Dignitatis Humanae*). The Cristeros died for the *Mass of All Time*; the conciliar sect *abolished* that Mass and replaced it with a Protestantized *memorial*. The Cristeros confessed *Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus*; the conciliar sect preaches *universal salvation*. The blood of the Mexican martyrs cries out *not* for the “religious liberty” of the Masonic Constitution of 1917, but for the *Restoration of All Things in Christ* — *Instaurare Omnia in Christo* — which is the *exact opposite* of the conciliar revolution. The *National Catholic Register* is an organ of the *abomination of desolation*; its “commentaries” are the *hiss of the serpent* disguised as the *voice of the shepherd*. *Quis ut Deus?*
Source:
The Cristero Rebellion of 1926 Offers a Sober Warning Today (ncregister.com)
Date: 04.08.2026