The EWTN News portal (August 6, 2026) reports that the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) has promulgated a new Fundamental Law for Vatican City State, dated July 31, 2026, replacing the 2023 constitution of the antipope Francis (Jorge Bergoglio). The cited article presents this juridical maneuver as a “correction” of a “Francis-era anomaly,” specifically the removal of the phrase “munus petrinum” as the basis for the “pope’s” temporal sovereignty, and the codification of the appointment of a laywoman, “Sister” Raffaella Petrini, to head the Governorate. The “experts” quoted—Giovanni Maria Vian and “Father” Roberto Regoli—hail this as a return to the “traditional formulation” of 1929 and 2000. This report exposes not a restoration of order, but the continued Masonic dismantling of the very concept of the Papacy, reducing the Vicar of Christ to a mere sovereign of a micro-state governed by laywomen, entirely severed from the divine constitution of the Church.
The Theatricality of Legal Fiction in the Conciliar Sect
The very premise of the EWTN report—that a “pope” can promulgate a “constitution” for a “state” created by the Lateran Treaty of 1929—operates entirely within the naturalistic, Masonic framework of the conciliar sect. The article speaks of “four constitutions” (1929, 2000, 2023, 2026) as if they were legitimate exercises of the potestas legislatoria of the Roman Pontiff. From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, the last true Pope to exercise sovereign legislative authority over the Papal States was Pius IX. The Lateran Treaty itself was a capitulation to the Masonic Italian Kingdom, signed by Pius XI under duress, creating a status quo that the Syllabus of Errors (Error 55: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church”) explicitly condemns as an error. The “Vatican City State” is a juridical fiction, a novus ordo construct designed to give the appearance of temporal sovereignty to a hierarchy that has long since abandoned the munus petrinum in reality.
The article notes that the 1929 law was “drafted by Jewish jurist Federico Cammeo.” This detail, casually mentioned by the portal, is a staggering admission: the civil legal framework of the “Vatican” was penned by an enemy of the Church, a fact that perfectly symbolizes the Masonic penetration of the structures occupying the Vatican. The current “constitution” is merely the latest act in a century-long drama of capitulation, not a exercise of the plenitudo potestatis.
The “Petrine Office” Anomaly: A Masonic Dialectic
The central claim of the article is that Francis introduced an “anomaly” by linking temporal authority to the munus petrinum (“by virtue of the Petrine office”), and that Leo XIV has “corrected” this by severing the link. The “expert” Vian states: “One cannot maintain that Peter possessed temporal power or that his successors received it directly from him… That did not occur until the beginning of the Middle Ages.” This is a heretical minimization of the Papacy disguised as historical scholarship.
While it is historically accurate that the exercise of temporal sovereignty over the Papal States developed historically (Donation of Pepin, Charlemagne, etc.), the right and the principle of temporal power are intrinsic to the munus petrinum as the guarantor of the Church’s libertas. Pope Pius XI, in Quas Primas (1925), the very encyclical instituting the Feast of Christ the King, teaches: “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ… Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ.” The temporal power of the Pope is not a medieval accretion; it is the necessary temporal instrumentum of the spiritual munus, ensuring the Libertas Ecclesiae against the potestas saecularis.
By declaring the link between the Petrine Office and temporal sovereignty an “anomaly,” the conciliar sect—through its “historians” Vian and Regoli—effectively denies the Social Kingship of Christ over civil society. They render unto Caesar not only what is Caesar’s, but what is God’s: the guarantee of the Church’s freedom. This is the laicism condemned by Pius XI in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The “correction” celebrated by EWTN is the formal juridical enthronement of the separation of Church and State inside the Vatican walls themselves.
The Usurpation of Governance: Laywomen and the Destruction of Hierarchy
The most scandalous aspect of this “constitution,” celebrated by the “expert” Regoli, is the formalization of a laywoman (“Sister” Raffaella Petrini) as head of the Pontifical Commission—the governor of the state. Regoli states: “This is because Vatican City State, since it is not directly connected to theological or sacramental matters, does not necessarily require its governor to be a cardinal, bishop, or cleric… Membership in the College of Cardinals is therefore not an indispensable requirement, because the position is not connected to the sacrament of holy orders.”
This statement is a manifesto of the Masonic “democratization” of the Church. It applies the secular principle of competence-based management to the government of the Holy See. It declares that the governance of the Patrimony of Peter is a purely administrative, “non-theological” function. This is the ecumenism of the civil service. It completes the revolution of Vatican II’s Lumen Gentium and Gaudium et Spes: the sacerdotium is abolished in favor of the laicatus.
Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code (cited in the provided Defense of Sedevacantism file) states that an office becomes vacant by “public defection from the Catholic faith.” The appointment of a woman to exercise potestas regiminis (power of governance) over a sovereign entity representing the Church is a public defection from the Catholic doctrine on the necessity of Holy Orders for jurisdiction. As Pope Pius VI taught in Auctorem Fidei (1794), the proposition that the Church’s government can be exercised by laymen is haeretica, schismatica, erronea. The “constitution” legalizes what is ipso facto invalid: a woman exercising episcopal jurisdiction.
Historical Revisionism: Whitewashing the Lateran Treaty
The article’s historical narrative, provided by Vian, is a masterpiece of Modernist revisionism. It recounts the “Roman Question” as a series of unfortunate events (1798, 1809, 1849, 1870) resolved providentially by the 1929 Pacts. It omits the anathemas of Pius IX against the usurpers of the Papal States, the Non Expedit, and the teaching that the temporal power is de jure divino in its origin and necessity (Vatican I, Pastor Aeternus, implicitly; Pius IX, Syllabus, Error 76: “The abolition of the temporal power… would contribute… to the liberty and prosperity of the Church” — CONDEMNED).
Vian claims the 1929 Treaty “created Vatican City State as a sovereign territory intended to guarantee the independence of the Holy See.” This is the Masonic narrative. The reality is that the Treaty recognized the accomplished fact of the Masonic conquest of Rome, confining the Pope to 108 acres, and binding the Holy See to a Concordat that subjected the Church in Italy to state control (e.g., exequatur for bishops, civil recognition of marriage). The “independence” guaranteed is the independence of a ghetto, a reservation for a hierarchy that has accepted the principles of the French Revolution.
The new “constitution” does not “return to the original spirit.” It perfects the capitulation. It makes the “Vatican State” a fully secularized NGO, governed by lay functionaries, its “sovereign” an antipope whose authority is explicitly not derived from Peter, but from the Lateran Treaty—i.e., from the Italian State and ultimately the Masonic international order.
Theological Bankruptcy: Temporal Power Divorced from Spiritual Authority
Regoli’s dictum—“Temporal power is at the service of spiritual power, nothing more. Temporal power cannot be divinized or placed on the same level as spiritual ministry”—sounds orthodox on the surface but functions as a theological solvent. In the hands of the conciliar sect, “service of spiritual power” means the temporal power must serve the agenda of the New Advent: ecumenism, religious liberty, interreligious dialogue, and the Agenda 2030.
The article reveals the ultimate logic of the conciliar revolution: The “Pope” is no longer the Vicar of Christ wielding the Two Swords (Spiritual and Temporal) in unity, but a “sovereign” of a micro-state whose legal basis is a treaty with Italy, and whose administration is entrusted to laywomen. This is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt 24:15). The “Petrine Office” is invoked only when useful for “synodality” and “inclusivity”; it is discarded when the civil law requires a “non-theological” administrator.
The “experts” Vian and Regoli are not “correcting an anomaly.” They are the periti of the anti-Church, providing the intellectual veneer for the final demolition of the Papacy’s temporal arm, which was the last visible bulwark of Christendom. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches (De Romano Pontifice, cited in the provided file): “A manifest heretic… by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head.” The antipopes of the conciliar sect (John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, Leo XIV) are manifest heretics (religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality, new mass). They have no authority to promulgate constitutions, appoint governors, or define the basis of temporal power. Their “laws” are null, void, and of no effect (Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Paul IV).
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation Consolidates Its Civil Structure
The EWTN report is not a news item; it is a press release for the Masonic restructuring of the Vatican. The removal of the munus petrinum from the Fundamental Law is the juridical confirmation that the conciliar sect has severed its last theoretical link to the Papacy instituted by Christ. The installation of a laywoman as “Governor” is the liturgical enactment of the priesthood of all believers (Protestant heresy) applied to civil governance.
True Catholics—those adhering to the integral faith of the pre-1958 Magisterium, the Syllabus, Quas Primas, Pascendi, and the valid bishops and priests maintaining the Tradition—recognize this “constitution” for what it is: the statutory charter of the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican. It has no force, no legitimacy, and no connection to the Societas Perfecta founded by Christ. The “anomaly” is not Francis’s 2023 text; the anomaly is the continued existence of the conciliar sect itself, masquerading as the Catholic Church. Non praevalebunt.
Source:
New Vatican constitution corrects Francis-era anomaly, experts say (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 06.08.2026