Hong Kong: Conciliar Sect’s Capitulation to Communism Unmasked by State Harassment

The Pillar portal (August 21, 2026) reports the conviction of two civil rights advocates, Chow Hang-tung and Lee Cheuk-yan, for “incitement to subversion” under Hong Kong’s National Security Law, stemming from a 2021 prayer vigil commemorating the Tiananmen Square massacre. Simultaneously, it details the detention of “auxiliary bishop” Joseph Ha Chi-shing by immigration authorities and reveals that “Cardinal” Stephen Chow, S.J., during the June 2026 ad limina visit, denounced “Cardinal” Joseph Zen and “Archbishop” Savio Hon Tai-Fai to “Cardinal” Pietro Parolin for allegedly undermining the “Sino-Vatican protocol.” The article portrays a “Church” hierarchy caught between a totalitarian state and a dwindling “pro-democracy” laity. This report inadvertently exposes the conciliar sect not as a persecuted Bride of Christ, but as a willing instrument of the Masonic-Communist world order, having traded the Kingship of Christ for a seat at the table of the Antichrist.


The Naturalistic Reduction of the Church’s Mission to Civil Rights Advocacy

The cited article frames the Hong Kong crisis entirely within the lexicon of secular liberalism: “civil liberties,” “basic civil liberties,” “free speech,” “democratic movements,” and “human rights.” Nowhere does it mention the Salus animarum (salvation of souls), the Social Kingship of Christ the King, the necessity of the Catholic Faith for eternal life, or the duty of the State to profess the true religion. The “prayer vigil” in Victoria Park is described as a “candlelit prayer vigil” for “democratic movements,” not as an act of Catholic worship or reparation. This is the inevitable fruit of the conciliar revolution: the Missio Dei has been reduced to missio humanae.

Pius XI, in Quas Primas, teaches with unshakeable authority: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” The “Cardinal” Chow’s attendance at such vigils prior to his “episcopal” appointment, and his later call to “move beyond finger pointing and the painful ‘I will never forgive’ mindset,” is not pastoral charity; it is a capitulation to the Masonic principle that truth and error have equal rights. The Syllabus of Pius IX condemns as error the proposition that “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship” (Error 77). The neo-church in Hong Kong lives this error as its operational constitution.

The “Sino-Vatican Protocol”: A Pact with the Synagogue of Satan

The article’s most damning revelation is the “Cardinal” Chow’s intervention at the ad limina visit. He reportedly told the “Secretary of State” of the antipope that “Cardinal” Zen and “Archbishop” Hon were “seeking to undermine him [Chow] and the Sino-Vatican protocol.” Here the true nature of the 2018 Vatican-China deal is laid bare: it is a concordata cum diabolo, a secret treaty binding the conciliar sect to the service of the Communist Party. The “protocol” is the supreme law; fidelity to Christ the King is “undermining” it.

The Syllabus condemns the error that “The Church is not a true and perfect society, entirely free… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church” (Error 19). The “Sino-Vatican protocol” does precisely this: it grants the atheist State the right to veto episcopal appointments and to dictate the limits of “religious activity.” The “Cardinal” Chow acts as the quaestor of this arrangement, policing his own “auxiliaries” and “priests” on behalf of Beijing. The detention of “Bishop” Ha is not persecution propter iustitiam (for the sake of justice); it is the master tugging the leash of a disobedient servant who strayed too close to the “pro-democracy” camp. The “senior cleric” quoted admits: “These people are Marxists but more importantly Maoist… The strategy is to ensure no organised institutional opposition anywhere in China.” The conciliar sect is tolerated only insofar as it remains an organized non-opposition.

False Shepherds Feigning Persecution While Betraying the Flock

The article attempts to construct a narrative of heroic suffering: “harassment of Church officials,” “routine harassment,” “detained by immigration authorities.” This is a grotesque simulation of martyrdom. True martyrdom is odium fidei (hatred of the Faith), not odium politicae (hatred of a political stance). The “clergy” targeted—Ha, Chan, Zen—are targeted not for preaching the Divinity of Christ, the necessity of Baptism, or the condemnation of Communism as intrinsically perverse (Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris), but for association with a “pro-democracy” political faction.

“Cardinal” Zen, arrested for a charity registration violation, is presented as a dissident. Yet he recognizes the usurpers in Rome, concelebrates the invalid Novus Ordo, and accepts the novelties of Vatican II. He is a “dissident” only within the parameters of the neo-church, a controlled opposition figure allowed to play the role of “conscience” to legitimize the overall structure. The “brightest and best Catholic laity” (like Jimmy Lai and Bobo Yip) are lauded for “free speech” activism, not for confessing the Integral Faith. They are martyrs of Liberalism, not of Christ. The unborn child of the Ulman family, cited in the FRAMEWORK as a pseudo-saint of the antipope, illustrates the same principle: the neo-church canonizes victims of political violence, not witnesses to the Faith.

The Theological Bankruptcy of “Dialogue” with Marxist Power

The “Cardinal” Chow’s strategy—“he can navigate his way through it all”—is the theology of Ostpolitik perfected by the heretic Montini (Paul VI) and ratified by the apostate Wojtyla (John Paul II). It presupposes that the Church can “dialogue” with a power that declares “there is no God” and “religion is the opium of the people.” This is the error of Indifferentism condemned by Gregory XVI (Mirari Vos) and Pius IX (Quanta Cura, Syllabus Error 16: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation”).

By seeking “closer relations between the diocese and the Church on the mainland,” the “Cardinal” Chow seeks communion with the “Patriotic Association”—a schismatic, state-run simulacrum of the Church, devoid of jurisdiction and grace. Communicatio in sacris with heretics and schismatics is forbidden by divine law (Canon 1258, 1917 Code; 2 John 1:10-11). The “Cardinal” Parolin, receiving the denunciation of Zen and Hon, acts as the enforcer of this adulterous union. The “demotion” of Hon in 2017 for opposing the deal proves that the only “orthodoxy” required in the conciliar sect is obedience to the revolutionary agenda.

Symptomatic of the Great Apostasy: The Conciliar Sect as State Apparatus

The entire Hong Kong scenario is a microcosm of the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt 24:15). The structures occupying the Vatican have transformed the Church from a perfect society (Leo XIII, Immortale Dei) into a department of the Masonic World State. The “National Security Law” is the civil sanction of the Masonic oath to destroy the Church; the “Sino-Vatican protocol” is the ecclesiastical sanction of that destruction.

The “prayer vigil” for Tiananmen is the liturgy of the new religion: the worship of Man, “democracy,” and “rights.” The “Mass” celebrated in these “dioceses” (if the Novus Ordo) is a Protestantized memorial meal, celebrated by men ordained in a rite that significat non dat (signifies but does not give) the priesthood, often by “bishops” consecrated in the same defective rite (Paul VI, 1968), rendering the sacraments doubtful at best, null at worst. There is no “Church in China” in the Catholic sense; there is only the Chinese Communist Party and its neo-church chaplaincy.

The faithful remnant in Hong Kong—and everywhere—must recognize that “he who is not with Me is against Me” (Matt 12:30). One cannot serve Christ and the “Sino-Vatican protocol.” The “Cardinal” Chow has chosen his master. The “harassment” he manages is the price of the thirty pieces of silver. “You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men” (1 Cor 7:23). The only true “navigation” is the via crucis of total separation from the conciliar sect, adherence to the Traditional Mass and Doctrine, and the public profession of the Kingship of Christ over every nation—including China.


Source:
Hong Kong crackdown continues with new convictions, increased harassment
  (pillarcatholic.com)
Date: 21.08.2026

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Antichurch.org
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.