The EWTN News portal (via ACI Prensa) reports that on September 4, 2026, the usurper antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) received a delegation from Oriel College, Oxford, marking the 700th anniversary of its royal charter. The antipope praised the Anglican-founded college’s “Christian identity” and held up the apostate convert John Henry Newman—”canonized” by the antipope Bergoglio—as a “shining example” of the inseparability of faith and reason, proposing his educational vision rooted in “human dignity, justice and the common good” as a remedy for contemporary challenges. This event constitutes a brazen manifestation of the conciliar sect’s apostasy: the antipope explicitly elevates the principal architect of the *development of doctrine* heresy—the very synthesis of Modernism condemned by St. Pius X in *Pascendi Dominici Gregis* and *Lamentabili Sane Exitu*—as the pedagogical model for the neo-church, confirming that the structures occupying the Vatican serve not Christ the King, but the Masonic project of a universal, naturalistic religion.
The Usurper’s Embrace of the Architect of Doctrinal Evolution
The antipope Leo XIV, continuing the unbroken line of usurpers since John XXIII, stood before a delegation from an Anglican institution—Oriel College, founded by King Edward II, the very cradle of the Oxford Movement—and declared it had “remained firm in its Christian identity.” This is a diabolical lie. Oriel College is an Anglican foundation; its “Christian identity” is schismatic and heretical by definition, severed from the *Una, Sancta, Catholica et Apostolica* Church since the 16th century. By praising this “identity,” the antipope ratifies the condemned error of **indifferentism** (Syllabus of Errors, props. 15, 16, 18), treating the false religion of Anglicanism as a valid path to salvation and a legitimate partner in the educational apostolate.
He then crowns this betrayal by exalting John Henry Newman. The Framework correctly identifies Newman as a “saint of Bergoglio, with an evolution of doctrine, a link between Modernism and Catholicism, a convert from Anglicanism, a scandalist.” The antipope calls Newman a “shining example of a scholar who not only showed the inseparability of faith and reason in his works but even more admirably in his life.” This is the language of the *neo-church*: it praises the *life* and *method* of the heretic to bypass the condemnation of his *doctrine*. Newman’s *Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine* is the theological engine of Modernism. It posits that dogma evolves, that truth “changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him” (*Lamentabili*, prop. 58). St. Pius X condemned the proposition that “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement… applicable to different times and places” (*Lamentabili*, prop. 59). This is Newman’s exact thesis. To propose Newman as a model for *education* is to institutionalize the **evolution of dogma** as the pedagogical principle of the conciliar sect.
Newman: The Trojan Horse of Modernism in the Conciliar Sect
The article quotes the antipope citing his own October 2025 apostolic letter *Drawing New Maps of Hope*—a title redolent of the Masonic “novus ordo seclorum”—to frame Newman’s relevance. Newman’s “idea of a university” famously sought to reconcile Catholic theology with the secular, liberal university model, subordinating theology to a “liberal education” where religious truth becomes one “science” among others. This is the destruction of the *Regina Scientiarum*. The antipope praises Newman’s “concreteness” and “personal relationship with God”—the classic Modernist pivot from *objective dogma* to *subjective religious experience* (cf. *Lamentabili*, props. 20, 25, 26).
The Framework notes Newman was “buried at his own request in the same grave as his ‘friend’ a priest”—Fr. Ambrose St. John—a detail the conciliar sect suppresses while “canonizing” him. This silence on the scandal of his private life and the heresy of his intellectual system is the *modus operandi* of the paramasonic structure: whitewash the agent of corruption to legitimize the corruption itself. The antipope’s praise of Newman’s “trust that God would guide him amid life’s uncertainties” (*Lead, Kindly Light*) replaces the certainty of the *Depositum Fidei* with the Protestant subjectivism of “conscience” and “guidance,” the very “private judgment” that Newman himself championed against the Magisterium before his conditional submission.
Reduction of Catholic Education to Naturalistic Humanism
The antipope states Newman proposes “a Christian formation that embraces the entire person and measures the value of education according to human dignity, justice and the capacity to serve the common good.” Note the total absence of the supernatural end. There is no mention of the *Beatific Vision*, the *State of Grace*, the *Sacraments*, the *Kingship of Christ*, or the *salvation of souls*.
Pope Pius XI, in *Quas Primas* (1925), teaches with unshakeable authority: “Peace is only possible in the Kingdom of Christ… When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken”. He condemns the “plague… of secularism, so-called laicism,” which “began with the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations.” The antipope’s triad—”human dignity, justice, common good”—is the creed of the Masonic Republic, stripped of the *Corpus Christi*. It is the Civitas Dei replaced by the Civitas Hominis. The Syllabus of Pius IX condemns the proposition: “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (prop. 41) and “The best theory of civil society requires that popular schools… should be freed from all ecclesiastical authority” (prop. 47). By adopting the secular criteria of “human dignity” and “common good” *detached from the Rights of God*, the antipope validates the Masonic school system. This is not Catholic education; it is anthropocentric idolatry.
Ecumenical Indifferentism: Legitimizing Anglican Foundations
The antipope’s celebration of Oriel College’s “Catholic origins as the ‘College of the Blessed Virgin Mary'” while ignoring its 400-year history as an Anglican college is a calculated act of **false ecumenism**. He calls the anniversary “an opportunity to celebrate its Catholic origins.” This is the hermeneutic of continuity applied to heresy: it pretends the Anglican schism never happened, or that the “Anglican Patrimony” is a valid expression of the Church. *Apostolicae Curae* (Leo XIII, 1896) declared Anglican orders “absolutely null and utterly void.” The Syllabus condemns: “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (prop. 18). By treating Oriel as a “community of faith and scholarship,” the antipope denies the *necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation* (*Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus*). He builds the “one world religion” on the ruins of the English Martyrs—St. Edmund Campion, St. Robert Southwell—who died precisely *because* Oriel College and its ilk rejected the Papacy and the Mass.
The “Heart to Heart” Deception: Sentimentalism Replaces Supernatural Faith
The antipope urges the delegation to facilitate a “heart to heart encounter with your brothers and sisters, and especially with our Lord Jesus Christ.” This is the language of the Charismatic/Renewal movement—cor ad cor loquitur stripped of *Credo*, *Sacramentum*, *Sacerdotium*. It reduces the encounter with Christ to an emotional experience, accessible *outside* the visible boundaries of the Church, outside the Sacraments administered by valid priests, outside the jurisdiction of true bishops. It is the Gnosticism of the “personal relationship” condemned by Pius XII in *Humani Generis* (1950) and the very essence of the “religion of the *homo novus*” prophesied by the Modernists. The true “heart to heart” is the Sacra Communio in the state of grace, within the unity of the *Corpus Mysticum*, under the authority of the true Roman Pontiff. The antipope offers a counterfeit intimacy that leaves souls in the darkness of heresy and invalid sacraments.
Silence on the Social Kingship of Christ: The Ultimate Apostasy
The gravest accusation is the total silence regarding the Social Kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ. *Quas Primas* commands: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ.” The antipope addresses an Oxford delegation—representing the elite of a nation that formally apostatized under Henry VIII and Elizabeth I—and speaks not of the *Rights of God*, the *Duty of Nations to profess the Catholic Faith*, or the *Condemnation of Liberalism*, but of “human dignity” and “justice.”
This silence is the signature of the Antichrist. As Pius XI warned: “When authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The antipope Leo XIV, by pointing to Newman—the man who tried to baptize liberalism—as the model for education, confirms that the conciliar sect is the whore of Babylon described in the Apocalypse, drunk on the wine of adultery with the kings of the earth (liberalism, Masonry, modernity), refusing the *Kingship of Christ*.
“You are Christ the King of glory!” sang the faithful in 1925. Today, the usurpers in the Vatican sing the praises of Newman, the prophet of doctrinal evolution. The contrast is absolute. The true Church, reduced to the *Ecclesia Catacombarum* faithful to the pre-1958 Magisterium, rejects this antipope, his false saints, his Masonic pedagogy, and his Satanic “heart to heart.” Christus Vincit, Christus Regnat, Christus Imperat.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV points to St. John Henry Newman as a model for education today (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 04.09.2026