The National Catholic Register portal, the English-language mouthpiece of the EWTN neo-conservative apparatus, reports on the latest public performance of the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) on 13 September 2026. The usurper occupying the Vatican apartments marked the twenty-fifth anniversary of the 11 September 2001 attacks with a generic prayer for “peace” and a reflection on forgiveness stripped of all supernatural density, judicial rigor, and reference to the Social Kingship of Christ. The cited article relates a carefully curated spectacle of naturalistic humanitarianism masquerading as Catholic piety, demonstrating once again that the conciliar sect has absolutely nothing to offer a world rushing toward the abyss but therapeutic sentimentality and Masonic pacifism.
The Theatrics of a Usurper: Liturgical Parody in St. Peter’s Square
The report describes the antipope “greeting the crowd gathered in St. Peter’s Square for his Angelus address.” This phrase alone encapsulates the ontological fraud of the post-conciliar structure. There is no Angelus in the true sense—no Roman Pontiff, no vicarial authority, no juridical mission ex officio to teach and govern. Robert Prevost, a manifest heretic who publicly adheres to the conciliar errors of religious liberty, false ecumenism, and collegiality, lost all jurisdiction ipso facto by Canon 188 §4 of the 1917 Code: “Publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches in De Romano Pontifice, “A manifest heretic… by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The “Angelus” of a layman—however vested in white cassock—is a private devotion, not a magisterial act. The faithful gathered in the square are not the Ecclesia docens receiving the depositum fidei, but an audience consuming a religious product.
Factual Level: The Instrumentalization of 9/11 for a Godless Agenda
The antipope’s English-language statement—“I renew my prayers for those who lost their lives and for those who continue to bear the wounds of that tragic day. At a time when conflict and violence afflict so many of our brothers and sisters, I invite everyone to pray that the Lord will bestow his gift of peace upon the world”—is a masterpiece of strategic ambiguity. Note the deliberate omissions: no mention of the just war doctrine, no condemnation of the specific ideology (Islamic jihadism) that motivated the attacks, no call for the conversion of nations to the one true Faith, no reference to the Kingship of Christ as the sole foundation of temporal peace. The victims are reduced to generic “brothers and sisters” in a vague humanist fraternity. This is not Catholic prayer; it is civil religion of the Masonic variety, perfectly aligned with the Syllabus of Errors condemned proposition 77: “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State.” The 9/11 anniversary becomes a pretext to advance the globalist “fraternity” of Fratelli Tutti, the encyclical of the previous usurper Bergoglio which the current antipope implicitly ratifies.
Linguistic Level: The Vocabulary of Therapeutic Deism
The Italian reflection reveals the neo-modernist lexicon in its purest form. Words like “gratuitousness” (gratuità), “healing,” “light,” “horizon,” “path,” “gentle breeze,” “clouds,” “sun”—this is not the language of the Roman Catechism or the Summa Theologiae. It is the language of Carl Rogers, of humanistic psychology, of the “spirituality of accompaniment” that has replaced the cura animarum. The antipope says: “All things are given to us by God out of pure love, and none of us can claim to be perfect in responding to such goodness. For this reason, gratuitousness — which is the source of our existence — is also the best rule for our life together.” This is Pelagianized grace: God gives, man responds imperfectly, and the “rule of life” becomes a vague reciprocity of gift-giving. Where is sanctifying grace? Where is the necessity of the Sacraments? Where is mortification, penance, the Cross? The parable of the unforgiving servant (Mt 18:23-35) is cited, but its judicial framework—the king who settles accounts, the prison and tormentors awaiting the unmerciful debtor—is entirely erased. Forgiveness becomes a psychological technique for “well-being” and “peace,” not a participation in the Mercy of God which demands conversion (metanoia) and satisfaction for sin.
Theological Level: Forgiveness Without Justice Is Not Christian; It Is Sentimental Complicity
The antipope declares: “Forgiveness is indispensable, and without it, we cannot live in peace.” This is a half-truth weaponized as a whole error. Catholic doctrine teaches that pax Christi in regno Christi—the peace of Christ in the Kingdom of Christ (Pius XI, Quas Primas). True peace is tranquillitas ordinis (St. Augustine, De Civitate Dei XIX.13), the tranquility of order, and order requires justice (iustitia). Forgiveness (remissio) does not abolish justice; it presupposes the recognition of the offense, contrition, purpose of amendment, and satisfaction. The parable cited by the antipope shows the king revoking the pardon when the servant refuses mercy: “Then his lord, after that he had called him, said to him, Thou wicked servant, I forgave thee all that debt, because thou besoughtest me: Shouldest not thou also have had compassion on thy fellowservant, even as I had pity on thee? And his lord was angry, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him” (Mt 18:32-34). The antipope’s “forgiveness” knows no tormentors, no debt, no judgment. It is the forgiveness of the world, which “loves its own” (Jn 15:19), not the forgiveness of the Crucified who prayed “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do” (Lk 23:34)—a prayer for ignorant executioners, not for obstinate heretics, jihadists, or Masonic revolutionaries who know they war against God.
The reference to St. Peter’s rehabilitation—“Jesus asked him only whether he loved him and once again called him to follow”—is grotesquely truncated. The antipope omits the threefold confession (“Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee”), the threefold commission (“Feed my lambs… feed my sheep”), and the prophecy of martyrdom (“When thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and lead thee whither thou wouldest not” — Jn 21:15-18). Peter’s forgiveness was sealed by blood, by the inverted cross. The antipope offers a forgiveness that costs nothing, demands nothing, and saves no one. It is the cheap grace Bonhoeffer warned against—though Bonhoeffer himself was a Protestant modernist, the concept applies perfectly to the conciliar sect’s theology.
Symptomatic Level: The Conciliar Sect’s Structural Incapacity for Supernatural Discourse
This address is not an anomaly; it is the modus operandi of the Church of the New Advent since 1958. The Second Vatican Council’s Gaudium et Spes and Dignitatis Humanae displaced the Social Kingship of Christ (defined infallibly by Pius XI in Quas Primas: “His reign extends not only to Catholic nations… but His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ”) with the “autonomy of the temporal order” and the “right to religious freedom.” The result is a hierarchy that cannot name the enemy (sin, Satan, heresy, Islam, Masonry, Communism) because it has dialogued with them, recognized their “rights,” and declared them “seeds of the Word.” The antipope’s call to pray “that the Lord will bestow his gift of peace upon the world” is the prayer of a NGO chaplain, not the Vicar of Christ. A true Pope would have used the 9/11 anniversary to thunder: “Convert! Do penance! Recognize the Kingship of Christ! The Mosque must yield to the Church! The State must confess the Catholic Faith! Outside the Church there is no salvation!” Instead, we get motorcyclists “gathered in support of peace and life”—a perfect image of the paramasonic structure: noise, leather, and naturalistic slogans replacing the Church Militant in cassock and biretta.
The Marian Deception: Mother of Mercy Without the Immaculate Heart’s Demands
The antipope concludes by invoking the “Virgin Mary, Mother of Mercy.” But which Mary? The Woman of Genesis 3:15 who crushes the serpent’s head? The Queen of Martyrs who demands the Consecration of Russia to her Immaculate Heart (as the true Sister Lucia requested, before her isolation and the probable substitution documented in the False Fatima Apparitions file)? Or the ecumenical “Mary” of the conciliar sect, stripped of her Co-Redemptrix title, her Mediatrix of All Graces role, her Assumption as a pledge of the resurrection of the flesh for the faithful only? The antipope’s Mary is a goddess of dialogue, a bridge to Islam (Fatima, the daughter of Muhammad), a symbol of the one-world religion. The file on False Fatima Apparitions exposes the Masonic operation: “The name ‘Fatima’: a symbol of Christian-Islamic syncretism.” The antipope’s invocation is the final seal of the fraud.
The Verdict: A Layman’s Therapy Session, Not a Pontifical Act
The article from the National Catholic Register documents not a papal act, but the public relations exercise of a paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican. The antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) possesses no jurisdiction, no charism of infallibility, no sacramental authority. His “forgiveness” is a psychological opiate for a civilization that has rejected the Crown Rights of Christ the King. As Pius XI warned in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” The 9/11 attacks were a fruit of that shaking. The antipope’s response deepens the ruin. True Catholics—those adhering to the integral Faith of the pre-1958 Magisterium, gathered around valid bishops and priests preserving the Mass of All Time—must reject this spectacle entirely. Our prayer for the 9/11 victims is the Requiem æternam of the Traditional Latin Mass, offered pro defunctis in the Communion of Saints, not the vague “prayers” of a usurper who serves the Prince of this World. Non est pax, dicit Dominus, impiis (Is 48:22). There is no peace, saith the Lord, for the wicked—nor for their false shepherds.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV Remembers 9/11 Victims, Calls for Peace and Forgiveness (ncregister.com)
Date: 13.09.2026