The Pillar Catholic portal reports that the Austrian Catholic Women’s Movement, a feminist lobby operating within the conciliar sect’s structures, has demanded the Austrian “bishops’ conference” amend its statutes to permit a layperson — explicitly a woman — to occupy the office of general secretary, currently held by the conciliar “priest” Peter Schipka. The group frames this demand as a requirement of “synodality,” the neo-church’s watchword for the democratization of the divine constitution. The article notes the “Holy See” rejected a similar request in 2000 for the US “conference,” but implies this resistance has “waned” as lay “general secretaries” proliferate across Europe. This maneuver is not administrative reform; it is the final stripping of the clerical character from the governance of the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican.
Usurpation of Clerical Office by the Laity: A Crime Against Divine Law
The demand that a layperson — and specifically a woman — head the general secretariat of a “bishops’ conference” strikes at the very constitution of the Church established by Christ. “He need not be a bishop, but he must be a priest,” the current statutes rightly insist, reflecting the immutable principle that governance (potestas regiminis) in the Church belongs exclusively to the hierarchy of Order. Pope Pius X, in Lamentabili sane exitu (1907), condemned the proposition that “The Church listening cooperates in such a way with the Church teaching… that the Church teaching should only approve the common opinions of the Church listening” (Prop. 6). The Austrian Women’s Movement inverts this: the “Church listening” (the laity, organized as a pressure group) demands the “Church teaching” (the hierarchy) surrender its offices to them.
Canon 109 of the 1917 Code (corresponding to the divine law) reserves ecclesiastical offices to clerics. The 1917 Code, Canon 145 §1, states: “Ecclesiastical offices cannot be validly obtained except by those who are in the clerical state.” To place a laywoman at the head of the administrative organ of the episcopate is to declare that the power of jurisdiction — even administrative coordination — does not flow from Holy Orders but from baptismal “co-responsibility,” the heretical keystone of the conciliar ecclesiology of Lumen Gentium. This is the democratization of the sanctuary, the Masonic ideal of liberté, égalité, fraternité imposed upon the Bride of Christ.
The “Bishops’ Conference” Itself: A Conciliar Monster Unknown to Tradition
The entire premise is vitiated by the existence of the “bishops’ conference” as a permanent, legislative body. Christus Dominus (1965) invented this collegial structure to undermine the monarchical authority of the Roman Pontiff and the residential bishop’s immediate subjection to him. Before 1958, no such permanent conferences existed; bishops met in provincial or plenary councils sub praesidio of the metropolitan or papal legate, not as a permanent “conference” with a standing secretariat. The very office of “general secretary” is a bureaucratic novelty of the neo-church, modeled on secular NGOs and Masonic lodges, designed to centralize control in the hands of the Roman Curia’s modernist faction while giving the illusion of “collegiality.”
The article boasts of lay “general secretaries” in Germany (Beate Gilles), Belgium, Scotland, Switzerland, the Netherlands — all nations where the Faith has been annihilated by the conciliar revolution. This is not a sign of vitality; it is the cadaveric spasm of a structure that has lost its supernatural raison d’être. When the “bishops” are themselves dubious — ordained in the invalid Novus Ordo rite of 1968, appointed by manifest heretics (John XXIII through Leo XIV) — their “conference” is a synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2:9), and its secretariat a den of thieves.
Feminist Subversion and the “Synodal” Trojan Horse
The chairwoman, Angelika Ritter-Grepl, declares: “Synodality that takes place only in roundtable discussions but never finds its way into structures and offices remains half-hearted.” Here the mask falls. “Synodality” is the engine of revolution; its fuel is the destruction of the distinction between clergy and laity, between male and female, between the teaching Church and the learning Church. The Austrian Catholic Women’s Movement is not a pious sodality; it is a feminist fifth column, analogous to the “Women’s Ordination Conference” in the US, demanding the priesthood under the guise of “administrative roles.”
Pope Pius XI, in Quas Primas (1925), teaches that Christ’s Kingdom is “primarily spiritual” and that “men who wish to belong to it prepare themselves through repentance, but cannot enter except through faith and baptism.” He condemns the “secularism of our times, so-called laicism” which “began with the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations.” The installation of a laywoman as “general secretary” is the enthronement of laicism inside the ecclesiastical structure. It signifies that the neo-church no longer even pretends to be a supernatural society; it is a humanist NGO managing the “spiritual” preferences of its members.
The 2000 Roman “No” and the Triumph of the Revolution
The article admits the Congregation for Bishops (then still a dicastery of the true Church, though already infiltrated) gave a “firm ‘no'” in 2000 to installing Sr. Sharon Euart as US “conference” general secretary, “insisting the role had to be filled by a cleric.” That “no” was the last gasp of the old discipline. The article notes “it is not clear when that insistence waned, but by 2009, such an installation had occurred for the Nordic episcopal conference.” The “waning” coincides precisely with the consolidation of the modernist occupation: the “pontificate” of Benedict XVI (who as Ratzinger engineered the conciliar revolution) and the explosion of “synodality” under Bergoglio and now Prevost (Leo XIV).
The Nordic “conference” (Sr. Anna Mirijam Kaschner, 2009) was the breach. Then Southern Africa (Sr. Hermenegild Makoro, 2012). Then Germany (Beate Gilles, 2021). Now Austria. The pattern is clear: the paramasonic structure uses “episcopal conferences” as laboratories for the abolition of the priesthood. The “general secretary” post is the beachhead; the “bishop” is next. Already the “synodal way” in Germany demands the “re-evaluation” of priestly celibacy and male-only ordination. Austria follows the German auto-demolition.
Canon 188.4 and the Vacancy of the Conciliar Hierarchy
The article treats the “bishops” and “priests” as legitimate pastors. From the perspective of integral Catholic faith, they are not. Cum ex Apostolatus Officio (Pope Paul IV, 1559) declares that any cleric who “has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy… his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect.” The “bishops” of the Austrian conference, by adhering to the Second Vatican Council’s heresies (religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality, new mass), have defected from the Faith. They hold no jurisdiction. Their “conference” has no canonical existence. Their “statutes” are waste paper. Their “general secretary” — cleric or lay — is a functionary of a civil association, not an ecclesiastical officer.
St. Robert Bellarmine (De Romano Pontifice) teaches: “A manifest heretic… by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The same principle applies to bishops. The “bishops” electing a laywoman would merely be laymen electing a laywoman to manage a Masonic front. The tragedy is that the faithful are deceived into believing this is “Church reform.”
The Syllabus Condemns This “Progress”
Pope Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors (1864) condemns: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Prop. 80). The Austrian Women’s Movement demands the “bishops” “engage in dialogue about opening up the office in a way that is in keeping with the times” (“einer zeitgemäßen Öffnung”). In tempore, non in aeternitate — they serve the spirit of the age, not the Holy Ghost. Prop. 55: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.” The neo-church has separated itself from Christ the King; it now apes the State’s bureaucratic feminism.
Prop. 39: “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.” The Women’s Movement speaks the language of “rights” (“Rechte”), not duties. “It is time… that this important office can also be held by lay people — both women and men.” This is the language of the French Revolution, not the Gospel. Non est potestas nisi a Deo (Rom. 13:1). All authority in the Church comes from Christ through Holy Orders, not from the “people of God” through democratic pressure.
Spiritual Bankruptcy: Silence on the Supernatural
Nowhere in the article — nor in the Women’s Movement’s statement — is there mention of: the salvation of souls, the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the sacraments, grace, sin, judgment, heaven, or hell. The “general secretary” role is discussed purely as an administrative, coordinative function — a CEO for a religious nonprofit. This is the naturalization of the Church condemned by Pius XI: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The Austrian “bishops’ conference” has no authority because it has no God. It manages the liquidation of Catholicism in Austria.
The “priest” Schipka’s resignation statement — “it is not good — either for the office or for myself — for the two to become too closely intertwined over such a long period” — reeks of the bureaucrat’s mentality. No supernatural sense of vocation, no non ministrari sed ministrare. He leaves to become a “professor of education.” The hireling flees (John 10:12).
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation Advances
The pressure on the Austrian “bishops’ conference” to install a laywoman as general secretary is a deliberate, staged provocation. It tests the waters for the formal abolition of the clerical state’s monopoly on governance. The “bishops” will likely comply, perhaps after a show of “discernment,” because they are not bishops but functionaries of the Antichurch. The true Church — the Ecclesia militans — remains in the catacombs, served by valid bishops and priests who reject the conciliar revolution in toto. They know that extra Ecclesiam nulla salus and that no “synodal” restructuring, no feminist infiltration, no Masonic “opening to the times” can alter the divine constitution: Pastores dabo vobis secundum cor meum (Jer. 3:15). The Austrian Women’s Movement serves the father of lies; the true faithful serve the King of Kings, whose Kingdom “shall have no end” (Dan. 7:14; Luke 1:33).
Source:
Austrian bishops’ conference urged to appoint lay general secretary (pillarcatholic.com)
Date: 15.09.2026