The EWTN News portal reports that “Cardinal” Pietro Parolin, Secretary of State of the conciliar sect occupying the Vatican, addressed a conference titled “Faith and Reason in the Age of Artificial Intelligence” at the Italian Parliament on September 16, 2026, urging nations to collaborate on AI governance while admitting he refuses to use AI for homilies because it is “all head and no heart.” The cited article relates Parolin’s endorsement of Italian President Sergio Mattarella’s appeal for international cooperation, his expression of hope for a diplomatic resolution to the Russia-Ukraine conflict through the “diplomacy of sowing,” and the conciliar sect’s continued alignment with technocratic globalism. This spectacle of a putative “Prince of the Church” begging secular powers for regulatory frameworks while ignoring the *Social Kingship of Christ the King* exposes the theological bankruptcy of the post-conciliar apostasy.
The Conciliar Sect’s Capitulation to Technocratic Naturalism
The conference itself—”Faith and Reason in the Age of Artificial Intelligence”—held at the *Palazzo Montecitorio*, seat of the Italian Parliament, symbolizes the complete inversion of the Catholic order. Here, the “Secretary of State” of the paramasonic structure masquerading as the Church does not proclaim the *Rights of God* and the *Kingship of Christ* over human legislation; rather, he petitions the civil power to manage a technological phenomenon. This is the precise fulfillment of the condemned proposition in the *Syllabus of Errors*: “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” (Error 39, Allocution *Maxima quidem*, June 9, 1862). Parolin’s plea for nations to “work together” and not “go it alone” reveals the conciliar sect’s internalization of the Masonic dogma of global governance. There is no reference to the *Divine Law*, no invocation of the *Decalogue*, no warning that technology devoid of *sanctifying grace* becomes an instrument of the *Antichrist*. The “faith” invoked in the conference title is reduced to a vague ethical sentiment, a “heart” juxtaposed to AI’s “head”—a purely naturalistic, humanitarian vocabulary indistinguishable from secular UNESCO declarations.
Parolin’s “Heart” Rhetoric: Sentimentalism Substituting for Supernatural Grace
Artificial intelligence is all head and no heart. I try to put a little heart into my homilies.
This soundbite, offered to journalists as a pastoral gem, is a theological monstrosity. The opposition of “head” (intellect) and “heart” (sentiment) is a hallmark of Modernist subjectivism, condemned by St. Pius X in *Lamentabili Sane Exitu* and *Pascendi Dominici Gregis*. The proposition “Faith, as assent of the mind, is ultimately based on a sum of probabilities” (Lamentabili, Prop. 25) finds its pastoral expression here: the homily becomes a vehicle for human warmth, not the *traditio* of *Divine Revelation*. The “heart” Parolin speaks of is not the *Sacred Heart of Jesus*, burning with love for souls and zeal for the *Glory of the Father*, but the humanist “heart” of the *Religion of Man*. A true successor of the Apostles would not “try to put a little heart” into his preaching; he would *fearlessly proclaim the whole counsel of God* (Acts 20:27), *in season and out of season* (2 Tim 4:2), knowing that fides ex auditu (faith comes by hearing) the Word of Christ, not by the affective resonance of the preacher’s personality. This reduction of the prophetic office to therapeutic communication is the *lex orandi, lex credendi* of the neo-church: a liturgy of self-affirmation replacing the *Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary*.
The Antipope Leo XIV and the “AI Homily” Distraction
The article notes that Parolin’s discouragement of AI-generated homilies “echoes that of Pope Leo XIV.” Robert Prevost, the current usurper of the Chair of Peter, is cited as an authority. This is the circulus vitiosus of the conciliar sect: the false pope validates the false cardinal, and the false cardinal validates the false pope. The warning against AI homilies serves as a red herring, a superficial “traditional” gesture designed to placate conservative novus ordites while the substance of the Faith is dismantled. As the *Defense of Sedevacantism* demonstrates, a manifest heretic loses the papacy *ipso facto* (Canon 188.4, 1917 Code; Bellarmine, *De Romano Pontifice*; *Cum ex Apostolatus Officio*). Prevost, by his public adherence to the heresies of Vatican II (religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality), is not the Vicar of Christ but a *latro et fur* (thief and robber, John 10:1) entering the sheepfold by another way. His “Q&A sessions with priests” possess zero magisterial authority; they are the pronouncements of a private theologian who has “defected from the Catholic Faith” (Bull *Cum ex Apostolatus Officio*). To cite him as a normative reference is to participate in the usurpation of jurisdiction.
Holy See Diplomacy: Sowing in the Wind, Reaping Apostasy
The diplomacy of the Holy See, the diplomacy of sowing, does not produce a harvest. So we hope that, by continuing to sow, one day, when God wills it, we may also reap.
This agrarian metaphor, applied to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, is a confession of impotence and a rejection of the *Kingship of Christ over Nations*. Pius XI, in *Quas Primas*, thundered: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” Parolin’s “diplomacy of sowing” sows not the *Seed of the Gospel* but the seeds of *indifferentism* and *naturalism*. The “Secretary for Relations with States,” “Archbishop” Paul Gallagher, travels to Moscow to negotiate with a schismatic and atheistic power structure, treating the temporal order as autonomous from the *Supernatural End*. This is the error condemned in the *Syllabus*: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55, Allocution *Acerbissimum*, Sept. 27, 1852). The conciliar sect’s diplomacy is not the *mediatrix* of Christ’s peace (*Pax Christi in Regno Christi*) but the handmaiden of the *Masonic New World Order*, seeking a *pax Romana* without the *Prince of Peace*. The reference to “when God wills it” is a pious veneer covering a practical *Deism*: God is relegated to a distant horizon, while the “diplomacy” operates entirely within the immanent sphere of geopolitical calculation.
The Syllabus Condemned This: Civil Society as Source of All Rights
Parolin’s appeal to “nations” and “states” to govern AI manifests the error “The civil government, even when in the hands of an infidel sovereign, has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Syllabus, Error 41) and “In the case of conflicting laws enacted by the two powers, the civil law prevails” (Error 42). By seeking AI governance from the *civil power*, the conciliar sect implicitly acknowledges the State as the supreme arbiter of the common good, even in matters touching the *natural law* and the *destiny of souls* (e.g., bioethics, surveillance, transhumanism). The *Syllabus* further condemns: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80). This is precisely the program of the “Faith and Reason” conference: a reconciliation with the *technocratic paradigm* of modernity. The “faith” presented is not the *supernatural virtue* infused at Baptism, but a cultural resource to be “dialogued” with “reason” understood as autonomous scientific rationality. This is the *synthesis of all heresies*—Modernism—defined by St. Pius X as the attempt to “transform [Catholicism] into a certain dogmaless Christianity, that is, into a broad and liberal Protestantism” (Lamentabili, Prop. 65).
Quas Primas: The Only Remedy Is Christ’s Public Reign
The encyclical *Quas Primas* (1925), cited in the context, provides the only Catholic answer to the chaos Parolin manages. Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King “to address the needs of the present times and provide a special remedy against the plague that poisons human society. And this plague is the secularism of our times, so-called laicism.” The remedy is not “global governance” or “AI ethics frameworks” but the public, social, and political recognition of Christ’s Royal Rights. “If men were ever to recognize Christ’s royal authority over themselves, both privately and publicly, then unheard-of blessings would flow upon the whole society, such as due freedom, order, and tranquility, and concord and peace.” Parolin’s silence on this *Kingship*—his failure to tell the Italian Parliament that *Jesus Christ must reign* over algorithms, parliaments, and armies—is the *gravest accusation*. It proves the conciliar sect is not the *Church Militant* but the *Church of the New Advent*, the *abomination of desolation* standing in the holy place (Matt 24:15). The “consecration to the Heart of Jesus” mentioned in *Quas Primas* as the annual act accompanying the Feast is reduced by Parolin to a vague “putting of heart” into homilies. The *Social Reign of the Sacred Heart* has been replaced by the *Social Reign of the Algorithm*, managed by a “heartful” technocracy.
The Fatima Diversion and the Masonic Operation
The context of the *False Fatima Apparitions* file illuminates the deeper strategy. The “consecration of Russia” narrative—invoked implicitly by the concern for Russia-Ukraine diplomacy—has historically served as a “tool to divert attention from modernism” and a “potential Masonic ‘psychological operation’ against the Church.” The “diplomacy of sowing” in Russia continues this diversion: it focuses on geopolitical boundaries while the *apostasy within* (the conciliar sect itself) metastasizes. The *Miracle of the Sun* is dismissed in the file as “mass optical manipulation… and mass panic and autosuggestion”; similarly, the “miracle” of the conciliar sect’s global influence is a mass autosuggestion maintained by media power (EWTN, Vatican News) and the *credentialing* of false authorities. The “Two Lucia Sisters” theory—concluding there was only one Lucia, controlled and isolated—parallels the single, controlled narrative of the “Vatican” today: one voice, the voice of the *paramasonic structure*, isolating the *Traditional Faith* in the catacombs.
Conclusion: The Conciliar Sect Serves the Prince of This World
The article from EWTN News documents a non-event: a functionary of the antichurch performing his function—legitimizing the secular order’s totalitarian management of technology and geopolitics. Parolin’s “heart” is the *cor ad cor loquitur* of a *Cardinal Newman* beatified by the antipope Bergoglio, a “saint” of “evolution of doctrine, a link between Modernism and Catholicism.” The “AI governance” sought is the *Tower of Babel* rebuilt in silicon. The true Church—Ecclesia Catholica, *una, sancta, catholica, apostolica*—endures only in those bishops and priests who retain *valid Orders* (pre-1968 rite), the *immemorial Mass of Trent*, and the *integral Profession of Faith* rejecting Vatican II. They alone possess the *jurisdiction* supplied by the *Church herself* in necessity (*Epikeia*), for “a manifest heretic cannot be Pope… he cannot be the head of something of which he is not a member” (Bellarmine, *De Romano Pontifice* 2:30). Parolin, Prevost, Gallagher—they are ministri di Satana (2 Cor 11:15) administering the *sacraments of the world*. Non possumus. We cannot collaborate. We must resist unto blood, *stantes firmi in fide* (1 Pet 5:9), awaiting the *Restoration of All Things in Christ* (Eph 1:10), which will come not by the “diplomacy of sowing” but by the *Parousia of the King of Kings*.
Source:
Cardinal Parolin says nations should work together to face the threats of AI (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 17.09.2026