The National Catholic Register reports that “Cardinal” Pietro Parolin, secretary of state for the usurper antipope Leo XIV, addressed a conference at the Italian Parliament on September 16, 2026, advocating international cooperation on artificial intelligence governance while remarking that AI is “all head and no heart.” This intervention reveals the conciliar sect’s complete reduction of the Church’s supernatural mission to naturalistic technocratic management, substituting the Kingship of Christ for the governance of algorithms.
The Conciliar Sect’s Service to the Masonic World Order
The spectacle of a “cardinal” of the neo-church addressing the Italian Parliament — the very Masonic institution condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (propositions 39, 55, 77-80) — manifests the conciliar sect‘s organic integration into the revolutionary world order. Parolin’s call for nations to “work together to face the challenges of artificial intelligence” echoes the Masonic ideal of universal brotherhood under naturalistic governance, explicitly condemned by Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed” (Pius XI, Quas Primas, citing Ubi Arcano).
The conference title — “Faith and Reason in the Age of Artificial Intelligence” — itself betrays the modernist inversion: faith is subordinated to a technological age, reason is severed from its supernatural end. Parolin thanks Italian President Sergio Mattarella for “his recent appeal for greater collaboration among states on AI governance,” thereby acknowledging the civil power as the true sovereign — a direct violation of Syllabus proposition 39: “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.”
Reduction of the Sacred to Sentimentalism
Parolin’s remark — “Artificial intelligence is all head and no heart. I try to put a little heart into my homilies” — exposes the sentimentalist anthropology of the conciliar religion. The Sacred Heart is not a metaphor for emotional warmth; it is the corpus mysticum of Christ the King, “whose kingdom shall have no end” (Dan. 7:14). Pius XI instituted the Feast of Christ the King precisely because “the hope of lasting peace will not yet shine upon nations as long as individuals and states renounce and do not wish to recognize the reign of our Savior” (Quas Primas).
The “heart” Parolin references is the humanistic coeur of Rousseau, not the Sacred Heart pierced for our redemption. His discouragement of AI-drafted homilies — echoed by antipope Leo XIV — focuses on authenticity of expression rather than validity of mission. A homily delivered by a “priest” of the new rite, ordained in the invalid 1968 rite, celebrating the Novus Ordo “table of assembly,” possesses no sacramental efficacy regardless of its human authorship. As St. Pius X condemned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (prop. 39-51), the Modernists reduce sacraments to “reminders” of divine presence — precisely the Protestantized theology undergirding the conciliar “presidency.”
The “Diplomacy of Sowing” as Rejection of Christ’s Kingship
Parolin’s description of Holy See diplomacy — “the diplomacy of sowing, does not produce a harvest… we hope that, by continuing to sow, one day, when God wills it, we may also reap” — constitutes a practical denial of the Social Kingship of Christ. Pius XI teaches: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate and contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness” (Quas Primas). The Church’s mission is not agricultural metaphor but legislative, judicial, and executive authority over souls and societies: “Christ Jesus is given to men as Redeemer… but at the same time He is the Lawgiver, to whom men owe obedience” (Quas Primas).
This “diplomacy of sowing” serves the ecumenical project condemned in the False Fatima Apparitions analysis: “The imprecise formulation ‘conversion of Russia’ (without specifying Catholicism) opens the way to religious relativism. It can serve to legitimize dialogue with schismatic Orthodoxy.” Parolin’s “Archbishop” Gallagher traveling to Moscow (August 25-27) to “discuss potential resolutions to the war” treats the Russian schism as a geopolitical partner rather than a soul to be converted — extra Ecclesiam nulla salus.
Automatic Loss of Office: The Theological Reality
The very existence of “Cardinal” Parolin exercising governance under antipope Leo XIV demonstrates the ipso facto vacancy of the Holy See since 1958. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches: “A manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church” (De Romano Pontifice). The Defense of Sedevacantism documentation proves that Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code — “Publicly defects from the Catholic faith” — applies automatically to the conciliar “popes” who promulgated Dignitatis Humanae (religious liberty), Nostra Aetate (false ecumenism), and the New Mass.
Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio confirms: “if at any time it shall appear that any… Cardinal… or even the Roman Pontiff… has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect.” The conciliar “cardinals” are not cardinals; the “pope” is not pope; their governance is nulla.
AI as the New Tower of Babel
The conference’s focus on AI governance reveals the paramasonic structure‘s true religion: technology as savior. Parolin’s warning that “there are countries which, in fact, want to go it alone” mirrors the globalist demand for centralized control — the novus ordo seclorum of the Masonic seal. The False Fatima Apparitions analysis identifies the “Masonic Operation ‘Fatima'” with its “ritualistic 200-year cycles” (1717, 1917, 2017); 2026 continues this apocalyptic timetable toward the abomination of desolation (Matt. 24:15).
St. Pius X condemned the Modernist proposition that “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and places, but rather initiated a certain religious movement, applied or applicable to different times and places” (Lamentabili Sane Exitu, prop. 59). The conciliar sect’s engagement with AI governance is precisely this: adapting the “religious movement” to the technological age, denying the immutability of Christ’s Kingship.
Conclusion: No Salvation in Technocratic Governance
Parolin’s performance at the Palazzo Montecitorio is not a “pastoral intervention” but a public act of apostasy — the “secretary of state” of a false church petitioning a Masonic parliament for collaboration in building the Antichrist’s infrastructure. The only remedy for the threats of AI, as for all evils, is the Social Reign of Christ the King: “If men were ever to recognize Christ’s royal authority over themselves, both privately and publicly, then unheard-of blessings would flow upon the whole society, such as due freedom, order, and tranquility, and concord and peace” (Quas Primas).
The faithful must reject the conciliar sect entirely — its “cardinals,” its “popes,” its “diplomacy,” its “homilies” — and cleave to the integral Catholic faith preserved by bishops and priests maintaining valid orders and the True Mass. Non praevalebunt (Matt. 16:18): the gates of hell shall not prevail against the Church of Christ, though they have occupied her visible structures.
Source:
Cardinal Parolin Says Nations Should Work Together to Face the Threats of AI (ncregister.com)
Date: 17.09.2026