The EWTN News portal reports the publication of the itinerary for the so-called “apostolic journey” of the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) to Uruguay, Argentina, and Peru from November 6–17, 2026. The schedule reveals a meticulously orchestrated political campaign: meetings with secular heads of state, “interfaith leaders,” “synodal teams,” and workers; stadium Masses and youth vigils modeled on Protestant revivalism; the crowning of a Marian statue by an invalid claimant to the papacy; and a pilgrimage to the shrine of the liberation theology icon Oscar Romero. This spectacle manifests the total substitution of the regnum Christi (Kingdom of Christ) for a horizontal, naturalistic parody of the Church’s divine mission.
The Usurper’s Itinerary: A Political Tour Masquerading as a Pastoral Visit
The document released by the “Holy See Press Office” reads like a state visit program for a head of a secular NGO, not the vicar of Christ. The antipope departs Rome on November 6, arriving in Montevideo for an “official welcome ceremony at the Plaza Independencia” followed by a “courtesy visit to the president of Uruguay, Yamandú Orsi.” In Argentina, he meets President Javier Milei and addresses “civil leaders and the diplomatic corps.” In Peru, he confers with President Keiko Fujimori. Nowhere does the schedule indicate any exercise of the potestas iurisdictionis (power of jurisdiction) proper to the Roman Pontiff — i.e., the binding and loosing of souls, the condemnation of error, the defense of the Church’s libertas (freedom) against civil encroachment. Instead, the antipope submits to the protocol of the very civil powers which the Syllabus of Errors condemns for claiming “a certain right not circumscribed by any limits” over the Church (Error 39) and for asserting that “the civil law prevails” in conflicts with ecclesiastical law (Error 42). As Pius XI teaches in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The antipope’s courting of Milei, Orsi, and Fujimori is not evangelization; it is the osculum infame (infamous kiss) of the civitas terrena (earthly city) by a false shepherd who has abandoned the civitas Dei (City of God).
“Interfaith Leaders” and the Condemned Heresy of Indifferentism
The schedule explicitly lists meetings with “interfaith leaders” in Argentina (at the Palacio San Martín) and with “representatives of the Amazonian peoples” in Peru. This is the operationalization of the heresy of indifferentism — condemned by Pius IX in the Syllabus (Error 15: “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true”; Error 16: “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation”) and by Pius XI in Quas Primas: “The Christian religion began to be equated with other false religions and shamelessly placed in the same category.” The antipope’s dialogue with non-Catholic sects and pagan Amazonian cults is not “encounter”; it is apostasy. It denies the necessitas medii (necessity of the means) — that “there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). By placing the Catholic Church on a par with “other forms of worship” (Syllabus, Error 77), the conciliar sect confirms its rupture with the depositum fidei (deposit of faith). The silence on conversio (conversion) is deafening: not a word of the mandatum (command) to “teach all nations… baptizing them” (Matt 28:19-20), only the Masonic language of “dialogue” and “accompaniment.”
The “Synodal” Perversion: Democratizing the Divine Constitution
The term “synodal teams” appears repeatedly: vespers with “bishops and the synodal teams” in Buenos Aires; meetings with “synodal teams” at the Shrine of Our Lady of Peace in Chiclayo; supper with priests of the Diocese of Chiclayo after “synodal” encounters. This neologism — unknown to the Church before the conciliar revolution — embodies the Modernist error condemned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 53: “The organic structure of the Church is subject to change, and the Christian community… is subject to continuous evolution”) and in Pascendi Dominici Gregis: the substitution of the hierarchia divinitus ordinata (hierarchy divinely ordained) for a “people of God” governed by collegial committees. The antipope’s reliance on “synodal teams” — lay and clerical bureaucrats — usurps the potestas ordinis and potestas iurisdictionis reserved to valid bishops and the true Roman Pontiff. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches (De Romano Pontifice), the Pope’s authority is a Deo (from God), not from a “synodal process.” The conciliar sect’s “synodality” is the reductio ad absurdum of the Protestant principle of private judgment, now institutionalized as ecclesial governance.
Stadium Masses and Youth Vigils: The Spectacle of the “New Pentecost”
The schedule features Masses at the Centenary Stadium (Montevideo), the Monumento de los Españoles (Buenos Aires), the Military Aviation School (Córdoba), the Basilica of Our Lady of Luján, the Estadio Monumental “U” (Lima), Pampas de Pimentel (Chiclayo), Santa Cruz de Succhabamba, Villa Deportiva Regional Ucayali (Pucallpa), and Las Palmas Air Base. These are not the Sacrificium Incruentum (Unbloody Sacrifice) offered ad Deum (to God) in the silence of the sanctuary; they are theatrical productions for the cameras, modeled on the “World Youth Day” spectacles invented by the antipope John Paul II. The “prayer vigils with young people” at stadiums — complete with “Angelus in the square” — replace the lex orandi (law of prayer) with the lex spectaculi (law of spectacle). Pius XI in Quas Primas warns that feasts are instituted “to move and inflame to meditate with greater piety on some mystery of faith,” not to provide entertainment. The reduction of the Holy Mass to a “gathering” at a sports arena, with the antipope as celebrity presider, is the liturgical expression of the heresy condemned in Lamentabili (Prop. 41): “The sacraments merely serve to remind man of the presence of the ever-benevolent Creator.” Here, the Sacrifice of Calvary is profaned into a communal meal for the “synodal” multitude.
Marian Coronation by an Invalid Claimant: Simulated Worship
On November 14, the antipope will “crown a statue of the Virgin Mary at the Cathedral of St. Mary in Chiclayo.” This act, reserved to the true Supreme Pontiff or his legitimate delegate, is here performed by a manifest heretic who, by the very fact of his public adhesion to the conciliar errors (religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality, the new Mass), has ipso facto lost all jurisdiction (Canon 188.4, 1917 Code; Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice; Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). As the Defense of Sedevacantism file demonstrates: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… a non-Christian in no way can be Pope… he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian.” The coronation is therefore a simulacrum — a Masonic ritual parodying the Church’s regal honors to the Mother of God. It recalls the warning in the False Fatima Apparitions file: “The name ‘Fatima’: a symbol of Christian-Islamic syncretism.” Here, the antipope crowns a statue in a land steeped in liberation theology and syncretic Andean paganism, furthering the “ecumenism project” that “opens the way to religious relativism.”
Pilgrimage to the Shrine of Oscar Romero: Canonization of Liberation Theology
The schedule notes a “private visit to a chapel dedicated to St. Oscar Romero” in Chiclayo. Romero — a liberation theology activist assassinated in 1980, beatified by the antipope Francis in 2015 and “canonized” in 2018 — is the patron saint of the conciliar sect’s “option for the poor,” which is in reality the baptism of Marxist class struggle. The Syllabus condemns “Socialism, Communism, Secret Societies” as “pests… frequently reprobated in the severest terms” (Section IV). Quas Primas declares: “The state is happy not by one means, and man by another; for the state is nothing else than a harmonious association of men” — not a vehicle for revolutionary upheaval. The antipope’s veneration of Romero signals the definitive triumph of the “Church of the New Advent” over the Church of Christ: the substitution of the regnum Christi for the regnum hominis (kingdom of man). The “jubilee year of St. Turibius of Mogrovejo” (a true saint, Archbishop of Lima 1579–1606) is instrumentalized to legitimize the false “jubilees” of the conciliar sect, which lack the potestas clavium (power of the keys) to grant indulgences.
Silence on the Supernatural: The Grave Omission
Nowhere in the eleven-day, three-country itinerary does one find: a call to conversion from sin; a warning against the novissima (last things: death, judgment, heaven, hell); a defense of the sanctitas matrimonii (holiness of marriage) against divorce and “gender” ideology; a condemnation of abortion (legal in Argentina since 2020, in Uruguay since 2012, in Peru in limited cases); a denunciation of the Masonic lodges that control Latin American politics; a reaffirmation of the Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (Outside the Church No Salvation). The schedule is purely horizontal: “authorities,” “workers,” “young people,” “Amazonian peoples,” “interfaith leaders,” “synodal teams.” This silence is the argumentum ex silentio (argument from silence) par excellence: the conciliar sect has no supernatural mission because it has no supernatural Head. As Pius XI teaches: “Christ the Lord… gave Himself as an example of humility and established a special law commanding love… My yoke is easy, and my burden is light.” The antipope offers no yoke, only the “light” burden of worldly accommodation.
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation in the Lands of the Conquistadors
The lands visited — Uruguay, Argentina, Peru — were won for Christ by the Conquistadores and missionaries who planted the Cross and the Sacrificium (Sacrifice) in the face of pagan empires. Today, the antipope returns not as a conqueror for Christ the King, but as a supplicant to the Masonic republics that have legalized the slaughter of the innocents and the corruption of marriage. His “apostolic journey” is the iter (journey) of the Antichristus (Antichrist) foretold by the Fathers: “who opposeth and is exalted above all that is called God… so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God” (2 Thess 2:4). The true Church — the Ecclesia Militans (Church Militant) — endures in the catacombs of the faithful who reject the conciliar sect, its false sacraments, its false hierarchy, and its false “pope.” Viva Cristo Rey! (Long live Christ the King!)
Source:
Pope Leo XIV’s schedule for Latin America trip released (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 21.09.2026