The EWTN News portal reports that the president of the Uruguayan Bishops’ Conference, Bishop Milton Tróccoli, heralds the impending November visit of the usurper antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) as a “spiritual springtime” for a nation where Holy Week was abolished by Masonic decree in 1919, barely 10% of nominal Catholics attend the Most Holy Sacrifice, and youth suicide rates lead Latin America—a catastrophic harvest of the conciliar revolution that this very visit seeks to legitimize and extend.
The Usurper’s Itinerary: A Masonic Victory Lap in the Land of “Tourism Week”
The article reveals the grotesque theater of the conciliar sect: a false “pope” received by a false “bishop” (Tróccoli, ordained and consecrated in the invalid post-1968 rites) to plan a visit to a country that legally erased the Kingship of Christ from its calendar over a century ago. Uruguay’s 1919 law renaming Holy Week to “Tourism Week” was not a secular accident but the fruition of the Masonic program condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (Prop. 55: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church”) and by Pope Leo XIII in Humanum Genus. The antipope’s arrival on the feast of the “Virgin of the 33″—a devotion rooted in the same Masonic-syncretic soil that produced the Fatima operation documented in our sources—completes the symbolism: the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican returns to bless the Masonic conquest of a once-Catholic nation.
The “Bishop” and His Null “Ad Limina”: Simulating Communion with an Antipope
Tróccoli’s “ad limina visit” to the Vatican is a simulation of Catholic hierarchy. As the Defense of Sedevacantism file demonstrates from St. Robert Bellarmine, Wernz and Vidal, and Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code: a manifest heretic loses the papacy ipso facto (“by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian”). The line of usurpers beginning with John XXIII—each publicly professing the heresies of Vatican II (religious liberty, ecumenism, collegiality, evolution of dogma)—are not popes but antipopes. Tróccoli’s meeting with Prevost is not an ad limina visit to the Successor of Peter but a diplomatic mission to the head of the “abomination of desolation” (Matt. 24:15). The “hour” Prevost spent with them discussing “how to transmit the Gospel” is blasphemous: the conciliar sect has no Gospel to transmit, having replaced the depositum fidei with the “hermeneutic of continuity” and the “spirit of the Council”—the very Modernism condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu (Props. 21, 22, 54, 58, 59: dogmas as human interpretations; truth evolving with man; Christ initiating a mere religious movement).
“Spiritual Springtime” Without Grace, Sacraments, or Conversion: The Language of Naturalism
Tróccoli’s rhetoric is pure naturalism. He speaks of “renewal of faith,” “dormant faith,” “practicing Catholics,” “encouraging,” “hope,” “meaning to life,” “reasons for living”—but never mentions sanctifying grace, the state of grace, mortification of sin, the Four Last Things, or the necessity of extra Ecclesiam nulla salus. This is the “cult of man” condemned by Pius XI in Quas Primas: “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The conciliar sect’s “evangelization” is reduced to social work: “bringing the Gospel and acting out of faith in Jesus Christ, and working for the common good.” This is the heresy of actionism—the reduction of the Church’s supernatural mission to temporal humanitarianism. As Pius XI teaches: “His kingdom is primarily spiritual and relates mainly to spiritual matters… men who wish to belong to it prepare themselves through repentance, but cannot enter except through faith and baptism.” Tróccoli offers a “springtime” without repentance, without the Cross, without the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary.
The Statistical Confession of Conciliar Failure
The article inadvertently documents the devastation wrought by the conciliar revolution in Uruguay:
– 35% nominal Catholic identification (down from near-totality pre-Vatican II)
– Only 10% of those attend Sunday Mass—a 97% apostasy rate among the baptized
– 40% “believers without religion” (the fruit of “religious liberty” and false ecumenism)
– Highest youth suicide rate in Latin America—the inevitable fruit of a society “without a more transcendent perspective,” i.e., without the true Faith and the true Mass
– Rising drug trafficking violence and childhood poverty
Tróccoli calls this “a mission country where we must proclaim the Gospel extensively.” In reality, it is a mission field created by the conciliar sect itself. The “rise in adult baptisms” he celebrates is statistically negligible against the hemorrhage of souls and likely consists of the conciliar “RCIA” process—catechesis devoid of dogmatic rigor, often administered by laypeople, culminating in invalid novus ordo “sacraments.” This is not conversion but recruitment into the neo-church.
The “Virgin of the 33”: Syncretic Idolatry Blessed by the Antipope
The centerpiece of the visit is the “Mass of the Virgin of the 33” at the National Shrine in Florida. The False Fatima Apparitions file exposes the pattern: “The name ‘Fatima’: a symbol of Christian-Islamic syncretism.” The “Virgin of the 33” (referencing the 33 Oriental patriots of Uruguayan independence, many Freemasons) functions identically—a nationalistic, Masonic-tinged Marian devotion displacing the true Mediatrix of All Graces. The antipope’s decision to “celebrate the Eucharist” (the invalid novus ordo service) on this feast, coinciding with the national pilgrimage, is a deliberate act of syncretic idolatry: blending Catholic form with Masonic civic religion. Pius XI in Quas Primas warns: “The state must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders… who contribute most to the expansion and establishment of Christ’s Kingdom.” Instead, the conciliar sect enslaves itself to the state’s Masonic calendar.
John Paul II: The Heretical Model for the New “Springtime”
Tróccoli explicitly invokes the “memories of St. John Paul II’s visits” (1987, 1988) as the template for Prevost’s visit. This is an admission of apostolic succession in heresy. Wojtyla (John Paul II) was a manifest heretic: he kissed the Quran, prayed with pagans at Assisi, taught that non-Christians are saved “in their own religions” (Redemptoris Missio), and canonized the Masonic operative Maximilian Kolbe. The “unity” and “resurgence of faith” Tróccoli recalls were the unity of the conciliar sect and a resurgence of sentimental religiosity, not the Catholic Faith. The antipope Leo XIV follows his predecessor’s playbook: emotional spectacles substituting for the Social Kingship of Christ.
Social Issues as Distraction from the Only Remedy: The Kingship of Christ
The article details Tróccoli’s litany of social pathologies: drug trafficking, polarization, childhood poverty, youth suicide. His solution? “Proclaiming a message of hope,” “giving meaning to life,” “working for the common good.” This is the Pelagianism of the conciliar sect: man saving himself by human effort and “positive messaging.” The Syllabus (Prop. 56, 57, 58) condemns the separation of moral law from divine sanction and the placement of morality in “accumulation of riches” and “gratification of pleasure.” Uruguay’s suicide epidemic is the direct consequence of the Masonic secularization (1919) and the conciliar apostasy (post-1965) that removed Christ the King from public life. As Pius XI declares: “If rulers of states… will have the conviction that they exercise authority not so much by their own right as by the command and in the place of the Divine King, everyone will notice how religiously and wisely they will use their authority.” The antipope’s visit will not restore Christ’s Kingship; it will further entrench the “separation of Church and State” that is the Masonic ideal.
The “Eucharist” at Centenario Stadium: Idolatry in a Sports Arena
The planned “Mass at Centenario Stadium” is the ultimate symbol of the conciliar sect’s degradation. The Most Holy Sacrifice—the Unbloody Renewal of Calvary—reduced to a stadium spectacle for the “encounter” with a false pope. This is the “table of assembly” replacing the Altar of Sacrifice, the “community meal” replacing the Propitiatory Victim. St. Pius X in Lamentabili (Prop. 45) condemns the denial of the historical institution of the Eucharist; the novus ordo rite practically denies its sacrificial nature. Receiving “Communion” in this context, from the hands of invalidly ordained “priests” in communion with an antipope, is not merely sacrilege—it is idolatry, participation in the “abomination of desolation standing in the holy place.”
Conclusion: No Springtime Without the Kingship of Christ
The “spiritual springtime” promised by the conciliar sect’s agents is a demonic parody of the true renewal that comes only from the Social Kingship of Our Lord Jesus Christ. Uruguay needs not a visit from a Masonic antipope blessing a Masonic “Virgin” in a stadium, but the restoration of the Traditional Latin Mass, the preaching of integral Catholic doctrine (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus, the necessity of the state’s subjection to Christ the King, the condemnation of religious liberty), and the administration of true sacraments by validly ordained priests. Until the conciliar sect is recognized as the “Church of the New Advent”—the “paramasonic structure” occupying the Vatican—and the faithful separate themselves entirely from its sacraments, its “bishops,” and its antipopes, Uruguay will remain in its long, Masonic winter. The only true “springtime” is the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart promised by the true Church—not the Fatima counterfeit—but the Immaculate Heart united to the Sacred Heart of Christ the King, reigning in medio inimicorum suorum (Ps. 109:2).
Source:
Bishop sees Pope Leo’s visit as bringing a ‘spiritual springtime’ to Uruguay (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 22.09.2026