The EWTN News portal reports on the visit of the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) to France on September 25, 2026, where, addressing the Masonic president Emmanuel Macron at the Élysée Palace, he praised the satanic principle of laïcité, extolled the revolutionary triad “liberty, equality, fraternity” as “ethical imperatives,” and reduced the Social Kingship of Christ to a vague “duty to protect life” compatible with secularism. This discourse constitutes a formal adhesion to the condemned errors of Liberalism and Americanism, sealing the apostasy of the conciliar sect.
Antipope Leo XIV Legitimizes Masonic Laïcité in France, Betrays Kingship of Christ
The Usurper on the Throne of Peter: A Manifest Heretic Without Jurisdiction
Before dissecting the rotten fruit, one must identify the tree. The individual presenting himself as “Pope Leo XIV,” Robert Prevost, is a manifest heretic who, by the very fact (ipso facto) of his public profession of the Vatican II religion — a synthesis of all heresies condemned by St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu and Pascendi Dominici Gregis — has automatically lost all jurisdiction and membership in the Catholic Church. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches in De Romano Pontifice: “A Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” The Defense of Sedevacantism file confirms: “By notorious and publicly manifested heresy, the Roman Pontiff… is deprived ipso facto of his personal jurisdiction even before any declaratory sentence by the Church.” Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code codifies this: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration… if the cleric: … 4. Publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio declares the promotion of a heretic “null, void, and of no effect.” Therefore, Prevost holds no authority; his “visit” is a political maneuver of the conciliar sect, not a pastoral act of the Vicar of Christ.
Adoration of the Masonic Idol: Laïcité as “Authentic Secularity”
The antipope’s declaration that the duty to protect life is “an expression of the authentic ‘secularity’ (laïcité) of the earthly city” is a blasphemous inversion of the Social Kingship of Christ. Laïcité is the legislative expression of the Masonic dogma of the separation of Church and State, formally condemned by Pope Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (Error 55: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church”) and by Pope Leo XIII in Immortale Dei. Pius XI, in Quas Primas, teaches that “the reign of Christ encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” To claim that a Christian in public life guided by faith “cannot be considered a proselytizer or a threat to the unity of the nation” is to deny the divine mandate to “teach all nations… teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you” (Mt 28:19-20). It is the heresy of Americanism, condemned by Leo XIII in Testem Benevolentiae, which seeks to accommodate the Church to the secular order.
Incensing the Revolutionary Triad: Liberty, Equality, Fraternity
The antipope’s praise of the French national motto — “liberty, equality, and fraternity” as a set of ‘ethical imperatives'” — is an act of idolatry before the altar of the Revolution. These principles, born of 1789, are the “pests of this kind… frequently reprobated in the severest terms” (Syllabus, Section IV). Libertas in the Masonic sense is license from God’s Law (Syllabus Error 3: “Human reason… is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood… it is law to itself”). Aequalitas denies the hierarchical order established by God (Syllabus Error 39: “The State… is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits”). Fraternitas without the Fatherhood of God is the Masonic counterfeit of Christian charity. Pius XI in Quas Primas warns: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” To propose these Masonic shibboleths as guides for technology and AI is to build the “Paradise of Machines” the antipope falsely claims to oppose, for a city built on laïcité is the City of Man, the kingdom of Satan.
Reduction of the Kingship of Christ to Naturalistic Humanitarianism
The speech’s central theme — “mutual respect and the protection of every human life is a duty incumbent upon each and every one of us” — while verbally orthodox, is stripped of its supernatural foundation. The antipope speaks of “life” as a biological value, not as a participation in the Life of Grace. He omits the sine qua non of Catholic social teaching: “There is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12, cited in Quas Primas). By framing the protection of life as a requirement of laïcité and “dialogue” with the State, he embraces the naturalism condemned in the Syllabus (Error 56: “Moral laws do not stand in need of the divine sanction”). The Lamentabili Sane decree condemns the Modernist error that “Faith, as assent of the mind, is ultimately based on a sum of probabilities” (Prop. 25) and that dogmas are mere “interpretation of religious facts” (Prop. 22). The antipope’s rhetoric is precisely this: a probabilistic, pragmatic appeal to “common good” divorced from the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary and the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
The “Dialogue” of Compromise: Macron and the Antipope
The private meeting with Emmanuel Macron — a ruthless promoter of abortion, euthanasia, and LGBT ideology — and the public exchange of compliments (“a President… who claims to be uninterested in the Church… would be failing in his duty”) realizes the condemned proposition of the Syllabus (Error 80): “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.” This is not the libertas Ecclesiae defended by Pius IX against Bismarck, but a collusio cum adversario. The antipope calls for “the State and religious institutions [to] maintain dialogue and join forces in the service of the common good.” Pius XI teaches the contrary: “The Church… demands for itself by a right belonging to it, which it cannot renounce, full freedom and independence from secular authority.” (Quas Primas). The “common good” of the Masonic Republic is the damnation of souls; collaboration is communicatio in sacris with the enemies of Christ.
UNESCO, Notre-Dame, and the Religion of Humanity
The itinerary — UNESCO headquarters, Notre-Dame (restored as a “cultural heritage” monument), a stadium vigil for 80,000 youth — reveals the true cult: the Religion of Humanity dear to Comte and the Masons. UNESCO is the pedagogical arm of the Masonic UN, promoting “education for world citizenship” (i.e., apostasy). The antipope’s celebration of Notre-Dame’s restoration as proof that “something considered irreparably destroyed can be reborn through mutual cooperation” is a Pelagian metaphor for the “rebuilding” of the Church according to the hermeneutic of rupture of Vatican II. The “prayer vigil” in a stadium is a liturgical abuse, a ludibrium replacing the Most Holy Sacrifice with a Protestantized assembly. The Syllabus condemns the error that “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41); the antipope’s submission to the French State’s schedule and venues confirms his subservience.
Nuclear Disarmament and Pacifism: The Gospel According to the UN
The call for a “ban on nuclear weapons” and lamentation for “war in the Middle East” devoid of any reference to the just war doctrine (St. Augustine, St. Thomas, Catechism of the Council of Trent) is utopian pacifism. Pius XII taught that disarmament without moral conversion is illusion. The antipope echoes the UN agenda, not the Prince of Peace who said “I came not to send peace, but a sword” (Mt 10:34). This is the “secularism of our times, so-called laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors” which Pius XI identified as the “plague that poisons human society” (Quas Primas). The antipope is its chief vector.
Georges Bernanos and the Instrumentalization of Catholic Literature
Citing Georges Bernanos — a lay novelist, not a Doctor of the Church — to warn against a “Paradise of Machines” while simultaneously endorsing the Masonic framework (AI ethics guided by “liberty, equality, fraternity”) is intellectual fraud. Bernanos died in 1948, before the full manifestation of the conciliar apostasy; his critique of technological tyranny is weaponized here to legitimize the very laïcité that enables it. The antipope quotes a Catholic writer to baptize a Masonic program. Quas Primas insists: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ.” The antipope proposes the exact opposite: a Christ confined to the sacristy, a “conscience” privatized by laïcité.
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation in the Holy Place
This visit is a masterpiece of the “Masonic Operation” described in the False Fatima Apparitions analysis: “Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” The antipope Leo XIV, standing in the Élysée — the seat of the Regicide Revolution — proclaiming the compatibility of the Gospel with laïcité, fulfills the prophecy of St. Paul: “The man of sin… sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God” (2 Thess 2:3-4). The true Church, Ecclesia militans, remains in the catacombs of Tradition, adhering to the immutable Magisterium of Pius IX, Leo XIII, St. Pius X, and Pius XI. “The prayer prescribed by the Church is the rule of faith” (Quas Primas); the liturgy of the conciliar sect is the rule of apostasy. Non praevalebunt.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV, in France, says protection of life a duty for everyone (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 25.09.2026