The Vatican News portal reports on September 26, 2026, that the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) traveled to the Sanctuary of Lourdes, where he knelt at the Grotto, lit a candle, deposited a golden rose, and recited the Our Father before a cheering crowd. The report frames the visit as an entrustment of France, its people, and its “Church” to the “Mother full of love,” petitioning for “fraternal harmony,” the poor, the suffering, and generic “peace.” This spectacle of sentimental humanitarianism, devoid of the munus of confirming the brethren in the Catholic Faith and establishing the Regnum Christi, exposes the conciliar sect’s definitive apostasy: a counterfeit papacy performing Masonic pageantry where the Social Kingship of Christ the King ought to reign.
The Liturgical Theater of a Manifest Heretic
The article describes a scene meticulously crafted for mass media consumption: “Mesdames et messieurs, le Pape est à Lourdes!” followed by chanting crowds, waving flags, and the obligatory “golden rose.” This is not the Vicarius Christi exercising the potestas iurisdictionis to bind and loose for the salvation of souls; it is a head of state of the Vatican City State performing diplomatic theater. The “Pope” of the neo-church—elected by a college of cardinals formed entirely within the Modernist paradigm—possesses no jurisdiction. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches in De Romano Pontifice, a manifest heretic “by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church.” Robert Prevost, a professed adherent of the Second Vatican Council’s heresies—religious liberty, false ecumenism, collegiality, and the new Mass—is a manifest heretic. His “promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect” (Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Pope Paul IV). Every gesture at Lourdes—the kneeling, the candle, the blessing—is the act of a private individual, a layman usurping the Chair of Peter, ipso facto deprived of office by Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code for public defection from the Faith.
Humanitarian Horizontalism vs. The Social Reign of Christ the King
The linguistic register of the report is revealing: “fraternal harmony,” “the poorest and those most in need,” “peace.” Nowhere is mentioned the gloria Dei, the conversion of sinners, the condemnation of error, or the Drexus Regni of Christ over nations. This is the precise embodiment of the “secularism of our times, so-called laicism” condemned by Pius XI in Quas Primas. The encyclical declares with unshakeable authority: “Peace is only possible in the kingdom of Christ” (Quas Primas, citing Leo XIII). The antipope prays for “peace” while ignoring the sine qua non of that peace: the public recognition of Christ’s Kingly authority over legislation, education, and public life. By entrusting France—a Masonic republic since 1789, legally separated from the Church since 1905—to “Our Lady” without demanding the repeal of the laws of separation, the abolition of abortion, or the restoration of the Catholic confessional State, the antipope validates the Error 55 of the Syllabus: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.” He validates Error 77: “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State.” This is not petition; it is capitulation.
The Golden Rose for the Republic of the Droits de l’Homme
The bestowal of the Golden Rose upon the Grotto is a masterstroke of the conciliar sect’s strategy: the sacralization of the Revolution. Lourdes exists within a nation whose constitutional order is founded on the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the very document Pius IX condemned as the “pest of indifferentism” (Syllabus, Error 79). The “crowd” that cheers—described as “pilgrims from across the world… looking for healing and peace”—represents the ecclesia horizontalis of Gaudium et Spes, seeking temporal solace, not the Church Militant seeking the Crown of Justice. The antipope’s prayer for “fraternal harmony amongst people” echoes the Masonic triad Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité, substituting the supernatural bond of charity (which requires unity of Faith) with the naturalistic bond of philanthropy. This is the cult of man denounced by Pius XI: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed” (Quas Primas, citing Ubi Arcano).
Modernist Sentimentalism Condemned by Lamentabili Sane Exitu
The report’s emphasis on emotion—”excitement turned to solemn silence,” “cheers,” “joy”—exposes the Modernist root of the neo-church’s piety. St. Pius X condemned in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 26) the proposition: “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief.” Here, the “Marian devotion” is stripped of its dogmatic content (the Immaculate Conception as a privilege of the Mother of God, crushing the head of the serpent/heresy) and reduced to a pragmatic therapy for “tensions and divisions.” The antipope acts as a “spiritual leader” managing feelings, not as the Doctor Veritatis defining doctrine. The “Mother full of love” becomes a vague deity of consolation, detached from the Co-Redemptrix who demands the consecration of nations to her Immaculate Heart *under the condition of the Faith*—a condition the French State explicitly rejects and the conciliar hierarchy refuses to impose.
The Symptomatic Silence: No Call to Conversion, No Condemnation of Error
What the article omits is the loudest condemnation. There is no call for France to abjure its Masonic constitution. No demand for the reparation of the blasphemies committed in the “arts” and “laws” of the Republic. No warning that “he who is not with Me is against Me” (Mt 12:30). The “Church” entrusted to Our Lady is the conciliar sect occupying the buildings, not the Ecclesia Catholica defined by the Four Marks. The antipope’s silence on the Syndicate of Errors ravaging France—gender theory in schools, euthanasia laws, the persecution of traditional Catholics—proves his complicity. He is the “pastor” who sees the wolf coming and flees (Jn 10:12), offering not the Staff of Peter but a golden rose to the hirelings managing the sanctuary.
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation in Holy Places
The visit of the antipope to Lourdes is not a “pilgrimage of peace”; it is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Mt 24:15). It signifies the total substitution of the Civitas Dei by the Civitas Hominis. The True Church, reduced to the remanens faithful adhering to the Mass of Trent and the doctrine of the Fathers, recognizes in this theater the fulfillment of the prophecy of the Great Apostasy. The only “entrustment” pleasing to Heaven is the restoration of the Integral Faith and the Social Kingship of Christ. Until the usurpers are expelled from the Vatican and a true Pope—elected by a canonical remnant—consecrates France (and Russia) to the Immaculate Heart *as the Vicar of Christ*, every golden rose laid at Lourdes by these impostors is a bribe offered to Heaven by the servants of the Prince of this World.
Source:
Pope Leo, a pilgrim in prayer at Lourdes (vaticannews.va)
Date: 26.09.2026