The Vatican News portal reports on the press conference held by the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) aboard the papal flight from Metz to Rome, concluding his four-day apostolic journey to France on September 28, 2026. The encounter reveals a consistent pattern: the substitution of the Social Kingship of Christ for a vacuous humanitarianism, the reduction of the Church’s divine mandate to a “voice” among many in secular discourse, and a studious avoidance of the rights of God in favor of the “values of human dignity” divorced from the Crown Rights of Jesus Christ. This is not the voice of the Vicar of Christ; it is the whimper of a functionary of the conciliar sect managing the abomination of desolation.
The “Systemic” Evasion: Protecting the Institution, Not the Flock
When pressed by Cyriac Zeller (I-Media) on whether the sexual abuse crisis is “systemic,” the antipope engages in semantic gymnastics: “Personally, I prefer to express it in a different way… Sexual abuse is first and foremost a human problem.” This is a calculated minimization of institutional responsibility. By relegating the rape of children by clergy to a generic “human problem,” he severs the crime from its ecclesiastical root: the loss of the faith, the destruction of the priesthood by the novus ordo rites, and the homosexual infiltration facilitated by the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican. St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu condemned the proposition that “The Church listening cooperates… that the Church teaching should only approve the common opinions of the Church listening” (Prop. 6). Here, the antipope “listens” to victims to manage public relations, not to exercise potestas iurisdictionis for the salvation of souls. He speaks of “healing” but never of justice, penance, or the canonical punishment of the guilty—because the neo-church has no jurisdiction, only “accompaniment.”
Laïcité and the Abdication of the Kingship of Christ
Xavier Le Normand (Le Pèlerin) asks whether the antipope crossed the line of laïcité—the Masonic separation of Church and State—by condemning euthanasia at the Élysée Palace. The response is a masterclass in theological surrender: “I would say that the understanding that the Church has of a separation between Church and politics… that I didn’t cross it… we’re not entering into politics, we’re applying the Gospel to people’s lives.”
This is a direct contradiction of Quas Primas. Pius XI teaches: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… For what we wrote at the beginning of Our Pontificate about the diminishing authority of law and respect for power… ‘When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed'” (Quas Primas, 31). The antipope explicitly accepts the Masonic principle that religion belongs to the “private sphere”—a proposition condemned by Pius IX in the Syllabus of Errors (Prop. 55: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church”). By declaring he did not cross the line, Leo XIV renounces the potestas indirecta of the Church over temporal powers in matters of the natural law and divine positive law. He reduces the Social Kingship of Christ to a “voice” offering “values,” precisely the “laicism” Pius XI called “the plague that poisons human society” (Quas Primas).
Pacifism as Apostasy: Russia, Ukraine, and the “Senseless” War
On the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the antipope declares: “wars that no longer make sense… the Church continues to raise her voice… inviting leaders such as those of Russia and Ukraine… to come, to sit down, to engage in dialogue.” He condemns the “arms industry” and proposes “spending more on health and education and less on weapons.” This is not Catholic teaching; it is Masonic pacifism. The Syllabus condemns the error that “The civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Prop. 41), but here the antipope inverts the order: he demands the State obey his humanitarian dictates while denying Christ’s direct rights over the State.
Catholic doctrine teaches that war can be just (bellum iustum) when waged by legitimate authority for a just cause. To declare all wars “senseless” is to deny the potestas gladii entrusted by God to the temporal sword (Rom 13:4). It is the heresy of pacifism, a fruit of the “cult of man” inaugurated at Vatican II. The antipope’s “envoys” (Gallagher, Zuppi) are not legati a latere of the true Church but functionaries of a paramasonic NGO seeking a “global ceasefire” that serves the New World Order, not the Pax Christi in Regno Christi. As Pius XI warned: “When authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed” (Quas Primas). The antipope’s “voice” has no authority because it derives from man, not God.
Artificial Intelligence: The New Tower of Babel
On AI, the antipope admits “I sleep at night” and expresses “relative optimism” that dialogue with “leaders of AI” and “political leaders” can prevent catastrophe. He cites the head of NVIDIA—a purveyor of the very technology threatening humanity—as a partner in “guardrails.” This is technocratic naïveté masquerading as pastoral care. Lamentabili sane exitu condemned the modernist proposition: “The progress of sciences requires a reform of the concept of Christian doctrine concerning God, creation, Revelation, the Person of the Incarnate Word, and Redemption” (Prop. 64). The antipope’s “Vatican commission on artificial intelligence” is precisely this: an attempt to accommodate the faith to the spirit of the age, to baptize the digital Antichrist with “ethical discernment” devoid of sanctifying grace. He seeks “dialogue” with the princes of this world (1 Cor 2:6) who are “coming to naught”, instead of proclaiming the First Commandment and the Kingship of Christ over all human ingenuity.
Germany: The “Missionary Spirit” of the Synodal Way
Asked about the “steady decline of Catholic Church in Germany” and the “astonishing rise of extremist parties,” the antipope responds with banal optimism: “I believe that if we find the true missionary spirit… there are still many, many people in Germany who want to live and celebrate their Christian and Catholic faith.” He mentions the “evangelical or Protestant Church” as equally afflicted, equating the one true Church with heretical sects—a violation of Mortalium Animos (Pius XI). He notes “far-right points of view with a certain kind of religion” condemned by “leaders of the Catholic Church and the Protestant Church in Germany”—i.e., the Modernist hierarchy of the Synodal Way that blesses sodomy, women’s “ordination,” and Communion for Protestants. The antipope does not condemn these heresies; he ignores them, preferring to warn against “extremist ideas”—a code for Catholic integralism. This is the “democratization of the Church” condemned by St. Pius X: the “Church listening” replacing the “Church teaching.”
The Theological Bankruptcy of a Usurper
The entire press conference manifests the sedevacantist thesis: the man occupying the Vatican is not the Pope. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches (De Romano Pontifice), “a Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head… a manifest heretic cannot be Pope” (Defense of Sedevacantism). Leo XIV manifests heresy by:
- Denying the Social Kingship of Christ (Quas Primas) via acceptance of laïcité.
- Preaching pacifism contrary to the ius naturale and ius gentium.
- Reducing the Church’s mission to humanitarian NGOs (Lamentabili, Prop. 59, 65).
- Recognizing false religions as equal partners (Syllabus, Prop. 16, 18).
Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code (Defense of Sedevacantism) declares: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact… if the cleric: 4. Publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” The antipope’s public defection is total. His “Magnifica Humanitas” (cited as his own encyclical) is a modernist manifesto, not a papal act. As Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio states: “if… the Roman Pontiff… has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect” (Defense of Sedevacantism).
Conclusion: The Silence of the Cross, the Noise of the World
Not once does the antipope mention the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Sacraments, the state of grace, Hell, Judgment, or the Immaculate Heart of Mary (the true one, not the Masonic Fatima construct). He offers “hope” without Faith, “dialogue” without Truth, “dignity” without Redemption. This is the religion of the Antichrist: a “broad and liberal Protestantism” (Lamentabili, Prop. 65) administered by “clergy” who “have defected from the Catholic Faith” (Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). The faithful must flee these structures (Apoc 18:4), cleave to the Tradition of the Fathers, the Tridentine Mass, and the Crown Rights of Christ the King, awaiting the restoration of all things in Christ (Eph 1:10). Non praevalebunt.
Source:
Pope: Wars are senseless; Russia and Ukraine should sit down to talk (vaticannews.va)
Date: 28.09.2026