The EWTN News portal reports that three conciliar “bishops” — John Barres of Rockville Centre, Thomas Paprocki of Springfield, and “Cardinal” Blase Cupich of Chicago — alongside communities of “religious sisters” including the Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm and the Little Sisters of the Poor, have initiated federal lawsuits in New York and Illinois seeking temporary injunctions against recently enacted assisted suicide statutes. Represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, these plaintiffs argue that the laws compel them to participate in a “suicide regime” by promoting the “benefits” of self-killing, under penalty of fines, license revocation, or imprisonment. “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) is cited describing the practice as “false compassion,” asserting that “what is legal is not necessarily moral.” The lawsuits have secured preliminary reprieves from federal judges Anne Nardacci and Franklin Valderrama. This spectacle of conciliar hierarchs groveling before secular tribunals for mere exemptions — while explicitly disclaiming any desire to impose Catholic truth on the civil order — manifests the total capitulation of the neo-church to the religion of liberty and the abandonment of the Social Kingship of Christ.
The Juridical Farce: Libertas Ecclesiae Reduced to Conscience Exemptions
The cited article reveals the ontological inversion at the heart of the conciliar “hierarchy’s” engagement with the civil power. The “bishops” and “sisters” do not petition the courts to strike down the laws as intrinsically unjust — lex injusta non est lex (an unjust law is no law at all) — but rather to carve out a private sphere of non-participation. “Cardinal” Cupich declares with brazen indifference: “the Church’s objection to this statute is not an attempt to impose Catholic teaching on non-Catholics… it is an effort to stop the State from compelling Catholic health care providers to violate their conscience.” This is the voice of Dignitatis Humanae, not of Quas Primas. Pius XI taught infallibly: “If rulers of states… wish to maintain their authority inviolate and contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness, let them not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ” (Quas Primas, 1925). The Syllabus of Pius IX condemns the proposition: “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55). Yet here the conciliar “archbishop” of Chicago affirms the separation as his guiding principle. He does not demand the repeal of the law because it violates the lex aeterna and the lex naturalis; he demands a privilegium for his corporations. This is not the libertas Ecclesiae of St. Ambrose before Theodosius; it is the libertas modernismi of the Second Vatican Council.
The Theological Bankruptcy of “Religious Liberty” as Legal Strategy
The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty — a darling of the conciliar establishment — frames the litigation as a defense of “conscience rights.” But the very concept of a right to religious liberty, understood as immunity from coercion in matters of faith by the civil power, was condemned by Gregory XVI (Mirari Vos, 1832) and Pius IX (Quanta Cura, 1864). The true Catholic doctrine, reiterated by Leo XIII in Libertas Praestantissimum (1888), holds that “liberty is to be regarded as legitimate only when it is in accordance with right reason and eternal law.” The “bishops” Barres and Paprocki, by invoking the First Amendment of the Masonic Constitution of the United States, place the Church under the judgment of the State. They accept the jurisdiction of U.S. District Judges — Anne Nardacci, Franklin Valderrama — to determine the scope of their “ministry.” St. Robert Bellarmine teaches: “The Pope has the power to judge all men, but can be judged by no one” (De Romano Pontifice, II, 2). By what authority do these “bishops” submit the munus regendi of the Church to the imperium of a secular court? The article notes the plaintiffs include a “Lutheran care home” — communicatio in sacris with heretics in a common legal front, a scandalous violation of Canon 1258 (1917 Code) and the perennial discipline of the Church. “Non est communicandum cum haereticis” (One must not communicate with heretics).
The Antipope’s “False Compassion”: A Modernist Soundbite
The article cites “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) during a visit to France: “It is impossible to regard causing death as something normal. What is legal is not necessarily moral.” This platitude is the summa of Modernist pastoral theology: a vague moral intuition divorced from the potestas iurisdictionis and the munus docendi of the true Vicar of Christ. A true Pope does not offer soundbites to the secular press; he anathematizes the legislators, excommunicates the “doctors” who kill, and interdicts the regions that permit such abominations. Pius IX, facing the Italian Masonic usurpation of the Papal States, did not sue in Italian courts for “conscientious objection” — he issued the Syllabus and the Non Expedit. The “pope” of the neo-church speaks the language of the Enlightenment, not the language of Peter. His “false compassion” phrase is a rhetorical crumb thrown to the “conservative” wing of the conciliar sect to maintain the illusion of doctrinal continuity while the lex credendi has been shattered by Amoris Laetitia, Fiducia Supplicans, and the synodal apostasy.
The “Religious Sisters”: Consecrated to the World, Not to Christ
The Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm and the Little Sisters of the Poor are presented as heroic plaintiffs. In reality, these “communities” have long since abandoned the vita contemplativa and the habitus religiosus for the apostolat social of the neo-church. Their “nursing homes” operate under state licensure, Medicare/Medicaid contracts, and secular labor laws — they are de facto agencies of the secular state wearing a religious habit. The lawsuit admits they are compelled to “tout the alleged benefits of taking one’s own life.” A true religious, faced with such a mandate, would close the institution rather than comply, placing the gloria Dei and the salus animarum above corporate survival. The “sisters” choose litigation to preserve their apostolate — negotiatores templi (merchants in the temple). Their foundresses (St. Teresa of Avila, St. Jeanne Jugan) would weep to see their daughters arguing before a Masonic judge for the “right” to refrain from promoting murder, while the murder itself proceeds unopposed in the next room.
Symptomatic Level: The Conciliar Sect as the Ancilla of the Culture of Death
The article inadvertently exposes the systemic function of the conciliar hierarchy within the New World Order. By channeling opposition to euthanasia into federal litigation for exemptions, the neo-church legitimizes the regime. The lawsuits concede the validity of the “suicide laws” for the general populace; they only seek a carve-out for “Catholic providers.” This is the modus operandi of the controlled opposition. The “bishops” Barres, Paprocki, Cupich — all appointed by the usurpers John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now Leo XIV — are functionaries of the abomination of desolation. Their “victories” are temporary injunctions that will be overturned or narrowed by higher courts, leaving the lex mortifera intact. The article notes: “The lawsuits are continuing their way through the federal courts and may reach the Supreme Court in time.” The Supreme Court of the United States — the high tribunal of the Masonic Republic — will have the final say on whether the “Church” may opt out of killing. Deus non irridetur (God is not mocked). The true Church, the Ecclesia militans persevering in the catacombs of Tradition (sedevacantist chapels, true religious orders, faithful laity), knows that no justice proceeds from the synagogue of Satan (Apoc. 2:9). The only remedy for the cultura mortis is the Rex Christus reigning publicly, sacramentally, and politically — Instaurare omnia in Christo (Eph. 1:10). The conciliar “bishops” sue Caesar for crumbs; the true faithful pray and work for the Christus Vincit, Christus Regnat, Christus Imperat.
Source:
Across the U.S., 3 bishops, dozens of religious sisters leading lawsuits against assisted suicide (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 30.09.2026