The EWTN News portal, a primary propaganda organ of the conciliar sect, publishes its weekly “World News Roundup” (October 2, 2026), cataloguing the activities of the neo-church’s hierarchy across the globe. The dispatch reveals a seamless tapestry of naturalistic politics, ecumenical indifferentism, and human rights idolatry—a total substitution of the supernatural mission of the Church for the agenda of the Masonic city of man. From Lithuania to Syria, the usurping hierarchy acts not as vicars of Christ the King, but as functionaries of a globalist NGO.
The Lithuanian Inquisition: Legalism Over Divine Justice
The report leads with the Lithuanian “bishops’ conference” announcing an investigation into crimes against minors since March 11, 1990—the date of independence from the Soviet Union. “The priority is the victim, not institutional reputation,” they declare, consulting the “Holy See” and “Lithuanian law enforcement.”
This is the language of the secular state, not the Bride of Christ. Where is the priority of Salus animarum suprema lex (the salvation of souls is the supreme law)? The investigation is framed purely in terms of criminal statistics and civil compliance since 1990, implicitly legitimizing the post-Soviet liberal order. The “bishops” (likely invalidly ordained in the post-1968 rite of Paul VI) seek credibility from the very Masonic structures that occupy the Vatican. As the Syllabus of Errors condemns: “The Church is not a true and perfect society… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church” (Error 19). Here, the neo-church invites the civil power to audit its conscience. The reference to “Father Tadas Švedavičius” charged with 34 counts is a spectacle of theatrical penance designed to appease the world, while the spiritual crime of the Novus Ordo “mass” and the invalid sacraments administered by these men—crimes against the First Commandment—remain unaddressed and indeed celebrated.
Philippine Episcopate: Champions of Masonic Democracy
In Manila, “Bishop” Elias Ayuban Jr. and the “CBCP” endorse the “Dapat Isa Lang” campaign for an “Anti-Political Dynasty Law.” “Public office must never become a family inheritance. It is a public trust entrusted to the people,” intones the “bishop,” appealing to the “mandate of our Constitution.”
Here the conciliar sect reveals itself as the chaplaincy of Liberalism. The Syllabus anathematizes the proposition: “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship” (Error 77). The Philippine “bishops” do not demand the Social Reign of Christ the King—as Pius XI commanded in Quas Primas: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate”—but rather agitate for a Masonic constitutional reform. They have exchanged the Kingship of Christ for the sovereignty of the people (vox populi, vox dei—the Masonic lie). Their “pastoral statement” cites “justice, equality, and the common good” as abstract secular virtues, severed from their theological foundation in the Divine Law. This is the laicism Pius XI denounced as “the plague that poisons human society.”
Syriac Schism: The Neo-Church’s Internal Rot
The dispute between “Patriarch” Ignatius Joseph III Younan and “Cardinal” Claudio Gugerotti over competing synods exposes the abomination of desolation within the Eastern rites of the neo-church. “Church law gives Younan the first right to convene the synod,” claims the patriarchate, while an unnamed source disputes the timing.
This is a squabble of usurpers over jurisdiction they do not possess. As the Defense of Sedevacantism file demonstrates via Bellarmine and Canon 188.4, a manifest heretic loses office ipso facto. The entire Syriac Catholic hierarchy, in communion with the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), has defected from the Faith. Their “canon law” is the code of a schismatic sect. The “tensions involving the patriarch and Cardinal Gugerotti” are merely rival factions of the paramasonic structure fighting for control of the assets and the narrative. There is no supernatural authority here, only ecclesiastical politics worthy of a corrupt corporation.
Angolan “Bishop”: Family Idolatry vs. Gospel Radicality
“Bishop” Maurício Agostinho Camuto of Caxito warns: “Jesus does not ask for spending more time in the Church than caring for the family… Religious involvement should not result in the abandonment of family responsibilities.” He cites husbands wanting to separate from wives who “spend more time in the Church than at home.”
This is a blasphemous inversion of Luke 14:26: “If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.” The “bishop” constructs a false opposition between the domestic church and the Church Militant, elevating natural family bonds above the supernatural bond of grace. This is the heresy of Naturalism condemned by Pius IX (Syllabus, Error 3: “Human reason… is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood… and suffices… to secure the welfare of men”). The call for “stronger formation… through catechesis and participation in the sacramental life” rings hollow when the “sacraments” are the invalid Novus Ordo rites and the “catechesis” is the modernist poison of the post-conciliar catechisms. He preaches bourgeois comfort, not the Cross.
Japanese “Cardinal”: High Priest of the Religion of Human Rights
“Cardinal” Tarcisio Isao Kikuchi echoes the antipope Leo XIV, urging Catholics to move from “merely managing migration” to “full and immediate protection of human rights.” He asks: “What can we ourselves do for ‘these little ones’?”
The cult of “Human Rights” has replaced the Kingship of Christ. Pius XI in Quas Primas teaches: “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The “cardinal” knows nothing of this. He speaks the language of the UN and the Masonic lodges. The “World Day of Refugees” is a secular observance; the neo-church baptizes it. The Syllabus condemns: “Moral laws do not stand in need of the divine sanction… it is not at all necessary that human laws should be made conformable to the laws of nature and receive their power of binding from God” (Error 56). Kikuchi’s “human rights” are precisely this: rights divorced from God, making the creature the measure of all things. Non possumus—we cannot accept this idolatry.
Northern Ireland: Ecumenical Indifferentism on Parade
The “Parades Commission” permits an Orange Order march through Catholic Portadown. “Archbishop” Eamon Martin (conciliar) and “Archbishop” John McDowell (Anglican) issue a joint statement: “How can we be good neighbors to each other?… We call for the urgent creation of a constructive, inclusive and reconciling initiative.”
This is the sin of ecumenism in its purest, most nauseating form. The Syllabus condemns: “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion, in which form it is given to please God equally as in the Catholic Church” (Error 18). The Orange Order celebrates the victory of the heretic William III over the Catholic James II—a celebration of the Reformation, i.e., the revolt against Christ’s Vicar. The conciliar “archbishop” stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the Anglican “archbishop” (a layman in a costume, lacking orders and jurisdiction) and calls for “inclusive reconciling initiative.” Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus. There is no “good neighborliness” with heresy; there is only the duty to convert. The “painful histories” are the damnation of souls led into schism. This joint statement is a spiritual suicide pact.
Iraq and Syria: Naturalistic Politics in Place of Catholic Order
The Christian parliamentarian in Iraq, Ramy Noori Syawish, worries about ISIS, “armed groups,” “economic hardship,” and “irregular public-sector salaries” driving emigration. He wants the “next Kurdistan Regional Government” to “prioritize services in Christian areas.” In Syria, debates rage over “women’s dress,” “separation of male and female students,” and “religious questions on employment forms.”
Nowhere is the Social Kingship of Christ mentioned. The Iraqi Christian looks to the state for protection, not to Christ the King. The Syrian debates are framed as “religion in public life” vs. “secularism”—the false dialectic of the French Revolution. Pius XI taught: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The neo-church hierarchy in these regions offers no Catholic solution—no call for a Catholic confessional state, no condemnation of Islam as a false religion, no proclamation of the Gospel as the only basis for social order. They are mere dhimmis negotiating survival in the Masonic world order.
Conclusion: The Neo-Church is the Whore of Babylon
This EWTN roundup is a catalogue of apostasy. Every “bishop,” “cardinal,” and “patriarch” cited operates entirely within the natural order. They speak of investigations, laws, constitutions, human rights, good neighbors, services, disputes—never of sin, grace, the Mass, the Papacy, the Last Things, the Conversion of nations. They are the “abomination of desolation… standing in the holy place” (Matt 24:15). The true Church—Ecclesia Militans—endures only in those who hold the integral Faith of the Fathers, reject the antipopes from John XXIII to Leo XIV, and await the restoration of the Sacerdotium and the Imperium under Christ the King. Viva Cristo Rey!
Source:
Lithuanian bishops announce investigation into crimes against minors since 1990 (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 02.10.2026