The Pillar Catholic portal reports the removal of “auxiliary bishop” Ricardo Seirutti of Córdoba by the “Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith” following a canonical process initiated by complaints from two adults alleging “conduct unbecoming to the episcopal office.” The “archdiocese” announced the sentence depriving Seirutti of his offices and banning him from appointments and hearing confessions for five years, while he retains faculties to “celebrate Mass” and administer other “sacraments” except confession. This is merely the latest collapse in a decade-long cascade of Argentine “bishops” resigning or removed under the Argentinian antipope Francis and now his successor, antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), who is scheduled to visit the ruins of the Argentine “church” in November. The systemic rot of the conciliar sect is laid bare: not shepherds, but hirelings fleeing the wolf; not successors of the Apostles, but functionaries of a paramasonic structure.
The Canonical Farce of a Vacant See
The article describes a “canonical judicial process ordered by the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith and conducted by the Interdiocesan Tribunal of Buenos Aires.” This is a simulation of justice within a vacuum of authority. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches in De Romano Pontifice, a manifest heretic ceases to be Pope ipso facto — ex se, non ex homine — by the very fact of heresy, not by human judgment. The “Dicastery” operates under the authority of an antipope who, by his public adhesion to the heresies of Vatican II (religious liberty, false ecumenism, collegiality), has severed himself from the Church. Therefore, any “canonical process” emanating from this source is null, void, and of no effect (nulla, irrita, et inanis), lacking the potestas iurisdictionis which can only flow from a true Roman Pontiff. Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio declares that if a Cardinal or “Roman Pontiff” has “defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy,” his promotion “shall be null, void, and of no effect.” The entire Argentine “episcopate” derives its claimed mission from this poisoned source.
The Theological Impossibility of “Bishops” in the Conciliar Sect
The article lists a litany of “bishops” — Sarlinga, Zanchetta, Zecca, Cuenca Revuelta, Taussig, Baliña, Larrazábal, Mestre, Domínguez, and now Seirutti — removed, resigned, or jailed. This is not a crisis of governance; it is the manifest fruit of invalid orders and a false hierarchy. The “bishops” of the new rite are ordained in the Pontificale Romanum of 1968, a rite stripped of the essential form for the transmission of the episcopacy (the explicit invocation of the Holy Ghost for the office of bishop) and promulgated by the arch-heretic Montini (Paul VI). As Leo XIII defined in Apostolicae Curae, a defect of form or intention invalidates the sacrament. The “episcopal upheaval” is the inevitable collapse of a structure built on sand — super arenam (Mt 7:26). These men are not bishops; they are laymen in purple shirts, exercising a simulated jurisdiction over a simulated flock.
Sexual Abuse as the Sacrament of the New Church
The article notes Zanchetta was “jailed in 2022 after a court found him guilty of aggravated sexual abuse against two former seminarians” and that Domínguez resigned “following allegations of abuse and coverup.” Larrazábal faced “accusations of harassment and abuse of power.” This is not a “scandal” within the Church; it is the modus operandi of the conciliar sect. The Syllabus of Errors (Pius IX) condemns the proposition that “the civil government… has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs” (Error 41), yet the sect submits its “clerics” to civil tribunals because it has no ecclesiastical forum — having abolished the true distinction between the forum internum and forum externum and surrendered to the State. The “Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith” reserves to itself “crimes against the faith and sacraments, and the clerical sexual abuse of minors.” In the true Church, the abuse of a minor by a cleric is a crime crying to heaven for vengeance, punished by deposition and degradation (Canon 1395 §2 CIC 1917). In the sect, it is managed by bureaucrats. The retention of the faculty to “celebrate Mass” by a deposed “bishop” like Seirutti — “retains the faculty to celebrate Mass and administer other sacraments except confession” — proves the sect views the Most Holy Sacrifice as a mere faculty, a permission slip, not the Actio Christi requiring the character indelebilis of the priesthood and the missio canonica of a true bishop.
The “Visit” of the Antipope: A Triumph of the Abomination
Antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) is scheduled to visit Buenos Aires, Córdoba, and Luján in November. The article calls it “the first papal visit to the country since Pope John Paul II’s 1987 trip.” This is a pilgrimage of the Antichrist’s vicar to the altar of the abomination. Pius XI in Quas Primas teaches: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The “visit” is a political theater to legitimize the usurpation. The “faithful” who greet him commit idolatry, rendering to a man the honor due to Christ the King alone. The “Shrine of Luján” will host not the Mother of God, but the puppet of the Revolution. St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu condemned the Modernist error that “the Church listening cooperates… that the Church teaching should only approve the common opinions of the Church listening” (Prop. 6). The “synodal” visit of Leo XIV is the apotheosis of this heresy: the “Church” becomes the people, the “pope” their servant.
The Silence on the Supernatural: The Gravest Accusation
Nowhere in the article — nor in the “archdiocese’s” statement, nor in the “Dicastery’s” process — is there mention of the salvation of souls, the state of grace, the horror of sacrilege, the Four Last Things, or the rights of Christ the King. The language is purely bureaucratic: “complaints filed,” “canonical judicial process,” “depriving of offices,” “banning from appointments,” “faculty to celebrate Mass.” This is the language of a corporation managing HR disputes, not the Bride of Christ guarding the deposit of faith. Lex orandi, lex credendi — the law of praying is the law of believing. The “Mass” they “celebrate” is the Novus Ordo Missae, a Protestantized memorial meal fabricated by Bugnini and his Masonic consultants, which de facto denies the Propitiatory Sacrifice and the Real Presence. To speak of a “bishop” retaining the “faculty to celebrate Mass” while banned from hearing confessions is a theological absurdity: the power to consecrate and the power to absolve are inseparable in the priesthood of Christ. Their separation is the hallmark of the Anglican heresy, now fully realized in the conciliar sect.
The Masonic Architecture of the Argentine Collapse
The pattern of resignations — 10 “bishops” in a decade — mirrors the Masonic strategy of infiltration and destruction documented in the analysis of the Fatima operation: “Stage 1: Implantation… Stage 2: Globalization… Stage 3: Takeover of the narrative by modernists.” Argentina, the homeland of the antipope Francis, is the laboratory of the “Church of the New Advent.” The “Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith” — formerly the Holy Office, gutted by Montini and Wojtyla — now functions as the internal security apparatus of the sect, silencing dissent and managing the controlled demolition of compromised agents. The “Interdiocesan Tribunal of Buenos Aires” is a kangaroo court. True canonical procedure requires a legitimate Ordinary; there is none in Argentina. The See of Buenos Aires has been vacant since the death of Cardinal Caggiano (1979) or arguably since the heresy of Vatican II. Sedes vacans, sedes non vacans — the See is empty, yet the structures are occupied by usurpers.
Conclusion: Flee the Whited Sepulchers
The “episcopal upheaval” in Argentina is not a crisis to be solved by the next “appointment” from Rome. It is the visible manifestation of the mysterium iniquitatis (2 Thess 2:7) operating where the True Mass has been suppressed and the True Faith abandoned. The faithful Catholic must have no communion with these “bishops,” these “priests,” this “pope,” these “sacraments.” Qui non est cum me, contra me est (Mt 12:30). The only canonical, theological, and spiritual response is to adhere to the bishops and priests who preserve the integral Tradition, the Tridentine Mass, and the unbroken magisterium prior to 1958 — the true Church of Christ, una, sancta, catholica, et apostolica, enduring in the catacombs while the whited sepulchers of Córdoba and Buenos Aires crumble.
Source:
Argentina’s episcopal upheaval continues with auxiliary bishop’s removal (pillarcatholic.com)
Date: 06.10.2026