The EWTN News portal reports that the usurper “Pope” Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) will resume his Wednesday general audience this week, having been cleared by his surgeon for a November apostolic journey to South America, while skipping the customary stay at Castel Gandolfo. The article centers on a Sunday interview with the antipope’s brother, Louis Prevost, who expresses surprise at the travel clearance, reveals his own battle with multiple myeloma, and describes a fraternal relationship marked by daily communication, mutual teasing, “off color” jokes, and the admission that he tells the supposed Vicar of Christ “he’s being stupid.” The piece reads like a celebrity health bulletin, devoid of any reference to the supernatural mission of the Papacy, the salvation of souls, or the rights of Christ the King.
The Usurpation of Peter’s Throne Masquerades as Routine Administration
The very premise of the article is an affront to the prima sedes a nemine iudicatur (the first see is judged by no one) and the dogmatic reality that the See of Peter has been vacant since the death of Pope Pius XII in 1958. The man presented as “Pope Leo XIV” is a manifest heretic who participates in the false worship of the conciliar sect, embraces the heresies of religious liberty, ecumenism, and collegiality condemned by the Syllabus of Errors and Quanta Cura, and whose very election proceeds from the corrupted conclave of the abomination of desolation occupying the Vatican. As St. Robert Bellarmine teaches, “a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church” (De Romano Pontifice). The “Defense of Sedevacantism” file confirms: “A non-Christian in no way can be Pope… he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian… therefore, a manifest heretic cannot be Pope.” Every act of governance, every “general audience,” every “apostolic journey” by this usurper is null, void, and of no effect by the very nature of his defection from the Faith, as Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio infallibly declares.
Reduction of the Papacy to a Geriatric Health Bulletin
The article’s obsessive focus on medical procedures — “cancerous lung nodule,” “surgery,” “recovery,” “cleared by Dr. Stefano Margaritora” — reveals the thoroughly naturalistic mindset of the conciliar sect and its media apparatus. There is not a whisper of the munus petrinum as the divinely instituted office of confirming the brethren in the Faith (Luke 22:32), nor of the papal duty to feed the sheep with sound doctrine and guard the deposit of faith against the wolves of Modernism. Pius XI in Quas Primas proclaims that “Christ received from the Father unlimited right over all that is created, so that all is subject to His will” and that “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The antipope’s “activities” are presented as the schedule of a CEO recovering from surgery, not the sacred labors of the Vicar of the King of Kings. The Syllabus of Errors condemns the proposition that “The Church is not a true and perfect society, entirely free… but it appertains to the civil power to define what are the rights of the Church” (Error 19); here, the “Church” is reduced to a human institution managed by medical clearance and travel logistics.
Profane Familiarity: The Brother’s Testimony as Indictment
The interview with Louis Prevost is a devastating exposure of the utter absence of the sensus Catholicus and the supernatural virtue of reverence due to the Petrine office. “When we get on the phone or talk, we give each other crap, you know? We tell jokes; some are off color.” “Asked how he could give the pope crap, he replied: ‘You tell him he’s being stupid.'” This is not the language of a son of the Church speaking of the Vicar of Christ; it is the language of the world, of laicism triumphant. St. Pius X in Lamentabili sane exitu condemns the Modernist error that “The Church listening cooperates in such a way with the Church teaching in defining truths of faith, that the Church teaching should only approve the common opinions of the Church listening” (Proposition 6). Here, the “pope” is reduced to a peer, a buddy, a sick old man to be teased. The very concept of reverentia toward the potestas iurisdictionis has evaporated. The Syllabus condemns: “The Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism and modern civilization” (Error 80) — and here the antipope’s own brother manifests that reconciliation in its most vulgar form.
The South American “Apostolic Journey”: Proselytism for the Neo-Church
The planned November trip to South America is hailed as an “apostolic journey,” but in the theology of the conciliar sect, this term has been emptied of its Catholic meaning. True apostolic journeys are for the propagation of the Faith, the condemnation of error, the confirmation of the brethren in unity with the See of Peter. The “journeys” of the usurpers since 1958 have served only to legitimize the false ecumenism condemned by Pius XI in Mortalium Animos, to promote religious liberty condemned by Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos and Pius IX in the Syllabus (Error 15: “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true”), and to advance the cult of man that Pius XI identifies in Quas Primas as the essence of “the secularism of our times, so-called laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors.” The surgeon’s “green light” for this journey is the seal of a purely human, naturalistic enterprise. No supernatural mandate, no divine impulse, no missio canonica from the true Church — only a medical certificate.
EWTN: The Propaganda Arm of the Conciliar Sect
The source, EWTN News, functions as the house organ of the neo-church, normalizing the usurpation, sanitizing the heresies, and presenting the theatricals of the antipopes as the life of the Church. The byline — “Ishmael Adibuah is interning as a staff writer in the EWTN News Vatican Bureau, with a background in scientific research, teaching, and congressional service” — underscores the worldly, professionalized, bureaucratic nature of this enterprise. There is no sensus fidei, no theological formation rooted in the immutable Magisterium, only “congressional service” and “scientific research.” The article’s related links — “Pope leads pilgrims in prayer 1 day after leaving…”, “Pope’s surgeon green lights Nov. 6–17 apostolic…” — are a litany of trivialities, a panem et circenses for the faithful abandoned by the true shepherds.
Silence on the Crisis: The Gravest Accusation
Nowhere in this article — nor in the entire output of the conciliar media — is there a mention of the great apostasy foretold by St. Paul (2 Thess 2:3), the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt 24:15), the loss of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in the vast majority of “parishes,” the invalidity of the new sacramental rites, the silence of the “bishops” on contraception, divorce, sodomy, and the murder of the unborn. The “False Fatima Apparitions” file correctly identifies the strategy: “Stage 3 (1958-2000): Takeover of the narrative by modernists, concealment of the Third Secret, ecumenical reinterpretation.” The article before us is a perfect specimen of Stage 4: the total normalization of the counter-church, where the only “news” is the health of the usurper and the banter of his brother.
Conclusion: Return to the King, Reject the Usurper
Pius XI in Quas Primas declares: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed, because the main reason why some have the right to command and others have the duty to obey was removed.” The antipope Leo XIV, his brother, his surgeon, his media apparatus, and his “apostolic journey” are all fruits of this removal. The only remedy is the social reign of Christ the King over individuals, families, and nations — a reign that the conciliar sect has explicitly rejected in favor of the reign of man. The faithful must reject the usurper, reject the sect, reject the novelties, and cling to the Tradition of the Fathers, the Mass of all time, and the bishops and priests who maintain valid orders and the integral Faith. Non praevalebunt — the gates of hell shall not prevail, but they have certainly infiltrated the visible structures. Ecclesia supplet only for those in communion with the true Church; for the rest, there is only icatus et vanitas.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV to resume Wednesday general audience this week, skips Castel Gandolfo (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 19.10.2026