The EWTN News portal, a flagship propaganda organ of the conciliar sect, reports that a “priest” of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic structure — one Father Andrii Stebivka, allegedly ordained in June 2024 — has been forcibly conscripted by the Ukrainian regime and dispatched to a military training center, with imminent deployment to the front lines against Russia. The article frames this as an administrative error: a “temporary gap in the state registry” failed to certify his “pastoral work,” causing recruitment officers to ignore his “documentation.” The “bishop” of Mukachevo, Teodor Matsapula, and the “apostolic nunciature” are said to be intervening. The piece closes with a sentimental nod to the man’s iconography in Dublin, Boston, and Kyiv. This report exposes the total impotence of the neo-church before the secular state it serves, and the utter nullity of its simulated priesthood.
The Simulated Priesthood of the Conciliar Rite
The article states Stebivka was “ordained a priest in June 2024 at the Cathedral of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross.” This ordination, performed in the post-conciliar rite of 1968 by a “bishop” consecrated in the same invalid rite, confers no sacramental character whatsoever. The Sacramentum Ordinis of Pius XII (1947) defined the matter and form of Holy Orders with dogmatic precision: the imposition of hands and the consecratory preface specifying the power to offer the Unbloody Sacrifice. The Montinian rite replaced this with a vague “presbyteral ministry” formula, omitting the essential reference to the propitiatory sacrifice. As Archbishop Lefebvre himself admitted — though he compromised by accepting the invalid “bishops” — the new rite is dubious at best, invalid at worst. A “priest” ordained in 2024 in the Greek Catholic structure (itself a Uniate wing of the conciliar sect) is a layman in vestments, a functionary of a paramasonic structure occupying ecclesiastical edifices.
The article’s language — “active clergy status,” “pastoral service,” “ministerial service” — reveals a purely bureaucratic, functionalist ecclesiology. There is zero mention of the character indelebilis, the sacerdos in aeternum, the power to confect the Body and Blood of Christ, to absolve sins, to act in persona Christi. The “priest” is reduced to a social worker with a registry entry. This is the inevitable fruit of Presbyterorum Ordinis (Vatican II), which redefined the priesthood as “service” rather than mediation. The conciliar sect has no priests; it has “presiders,” “animators,” “pastoral agents.” The Ukrainian state knows this better than the neo-church: it treats the “clergy” as mere citizens, because that is what they objectively are.
The Neo-Church’s Servility to the Secular Power
Despite repeated efforts to provide proof of his active clergy status and ongoing pastoral service to the faithful, recruitment authorities rejected his documentation and sent him to a military training center.
The “recruitment authorities” — the agents of a Masonic, Zionist-installed regime in Kiev — correctly perceive that the conciliar sect possesses no supernatural immunity. The Syllabus of Errors (Pius IX, 1864) condemns the proposition: “The Church has not the power of using force, nor has she any temporal power, direct or indirect” (Error 24). But the conciliar sect renounced temporal power and supernatural authority at Vatican II. Dignitatis Humanae surrendered the Church’s right to coerce; Gaudium et Spes subordinated her to the “autonomy of the temporal order.” The “bishop” Matsapula and the “nunciature” now beg the Caesar they legitimized. They reap what they sowed: a Church that refuses to reign with Christ is trampled by the state.
Pius XI in Quas Primas (1925) declared: “When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.” The Ukrainian state, a creature of the Masonic West, shakes the neo-church because the neo-church is the shaking — it is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Matt. 24:15). The “priest” is conscripted because the neo-church has no jus divinum to claim exemption; it has only the exsequatur of the civil power, which Pius IX condemned (Error 41). The “gap in the state registry” is the perfect symbol: the neo-church’s existence depends on the state’s database.
Iconography as Idolatry in the Service of the Neo-Church
The article devotes significant space to Stebivka’s “artistic work as an iconographer,” listing “sacred compositions and apse murals in churches in Dublin, Boston, and various Ukrainian cities.” This is not Catholic sacred art; it is the aesthetic decoration of the counter-church. True iconography flows from the theosis of the iconographer, rooted in the Hesychast tradition of the Uncreated Light, itself dependent on the valid sacraments and the True Faith. A layman ordained in a heretical rite, serving a structure in communion with the antipope in Rome, painting images in buildings that host the Novus Ordo “table of assembly” — this is religious kitsch at best, idolatry at worst. The Seventh Ecumenical Council (Nicaea II, 787) defined that icons are venerated because they depict the prototype — Christ, the Theotokos, the Saints — in truth. An icon painted by a false “priest” in a false “church” depicts a phantom. The article’s pride in this “ministry” reveals the neo-church’s reduction of the sacred to the aesthetic, the cultural, the humanitarian.
EWTN: The Propaganda Arm of the Antichurch
The source — EWTN News, “translated and adapted by EWTN News English” from “EWTN News Español” — is the media ministry of the conciliar sect, founded by the “Mother Angelica” who built her empire on the Charismatic Renewal (a Protestantized, Masonic infiltration) and total submission to the usurpers in Rome. EWTN never questions the validity of the “pope,” the “bishops,” the “sacraments” of the new rites. It functions to normalize the neo-church, to make the faithful believe the structures occupying the Vatican are the Catholic Church. This article is a human-interest piece designed to elicit sympathy for a “priest” who is no priest, in a “church” that is no church, in a war engineered by the same Masonic forces that created the neo-church. The “appeal to civil, military, and diplomatic authorities” is the cry of a slave to his master. There is no appeal to Christ the King, no invocation of Exsurge Domine, no recognition that the Social Reign of Christ is the only solution.
The Masonic Dialectic: War as the Altar of the New World Order
The war in Ukraine is not a conflict of nations but a Masonic sacrifice — the slaughter of Slavic Christians on both sides to advance the Novus Ordo Seclorum. The “Greek Catholic” structure, historically a tool of Polonization and Vatican centralization, now serves as a chaplaincy for the Kiev regime. The “Latin” rite neo-church in the West blesses the NATO war machine. The “Orthodox” patriarch Kirill blesses the Russian war machine. All three are apostate structures — the conciliar sect, the “World Orthodoxy” (ecumenist, Sergianist), the “Uniate” wing — united in the syncretism of blood. The conscription of a “priest” is the logical terminus of the hermeneutic of continuity: the altar is replaced by the trench; the Host by the bullet; the Victima Paschali by the cannon fodder.
St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907) condemned the Modernist proposition: “Christ did not intend to establish the Church as a community lasting for centuries on earth, as He believed in the imminent coming of the heavenly kingdom” (Prop. 52). The neo-church lives this proposition: it has no eternal horizon, only the immanent — “pastoral service,” “iconography,” “diplomatic steps.” The “priest” sent to the front is the victim of the neo-church’s apostasy. His “bishop” and “nuncio” are complicit. EWTN is the chorus.
No Salvation Outside the True Church — And This Is Not It
The article’s final appeal — “that the pastoral nature of his vocation be recognized and that he be permitted to continue carrying out his priestly ministry in Mukachevo” — is a plea for legal tolerance from a Godless state. It is not a cry for the Rights of Christ the King. Pius XI taught: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ… if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate.” The Ukrainian rulers, like all modern rulers, refuse this veneration. The neo-church does not demand it. It demands only a registry entry.
The true Catholic priest — validly ordained in the Roman Rite of St. Pius V, under a valid bishop holding the Catholic Faith entire — would rather die than don a uniform. He knows his potestas ordinis and potestas jurisdictionis come from Christ alone, not from a “state registry.” He knows the Canon 188.4 (1917 Code): “Publicly defects from the Catholic faith… office becomes vacant by the mere fact.” The conciliar “clergy” have publicly defected by adhering to the Vatican II sect. They hold no office. The Ukrainian state merely recognizes the reality.
Non est potestas nisi a Deo. There is no power but from God. The neo-church has severed itself from God. Its “priests” are conscripted because they are citizens of the City of Man, not the City of God. The only remedy is not “reinstatement to parish duties” in the counter-church, but conversion to the integral Catholic Faith, valid sacraments, and the true Hierarchy — the Ecclesia Militans that endures in the catacombs, awaiting the Restoration.
Source:
Ukrainian priest forcibly conscripted, could be sent to front lines (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 19.10.2026