EWTN News portal reports that the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) has appointed twenty-four new members to the International Theological Commission (ITC), a body established by the false pope Paul VI in 1969 as an instrument of the conciliar revolution. The commission, now comprising sixteen conciliar “priests,” one “religious sister,” and seven laymen — a composition that itself mocks the clerical nature of the teaching office — will operate under the direction of the arch-modernist Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith. The ITC is tasked with two subcommissions: one to “clarify what Tradition with a capital T is,” drawing on “biblical, patristic, historical, philosophical, and even scientific contributions,” and another to study “cultural forms through which the faith is transmitted,” focusing on inculturation and popular piety. The sources explicitly state the commission will “thoughtfully assimilate what the various pontiffs, from Paul VI to Magnifica Humanitas, have clarified on the matter,” thereby canonizing the entire anti-papal line from Montini to Prevost as a continuous magisterium. This maneuver is not a search for truth but a further entrenchment of the modernist heresy of *vital immanence*, where Tradition is reduced to a historical process of cultural adaptation, severing the immutable deposit of faith from its divine Author.
Usurpation of the Teaching Office by a Paramasonic Structure
The very premise of this “commission” is a crime against the divine constitution of the Church. Christ the Lord entrusted the guardianship of Tradition exclusively to the living Magisterium of the Pope and the bishops in communion with him (*Pastor aeternus*, Vatican I; *Mystici Corporis*, Pius XII). He did not establish a parliamentary committee of “internationally recognized theologians” — a category that in the conciliar sect serves as a synonym for certified modernists — to “clarify” what Tradition is, as if the Church had forgotten her own nature for nineteen centuries until the “theological experts” of the New Advent arrived. The ITC, created by the apostate Montini (Paul VI) in 1969, is a novus ordo invention designed to bypass the ordinary and universal Magisterium, substituting a collegial, synodal, and ultimately democratic process for the monarchical authority of the Roman Pontiff. That the antipope Prevost now renews and expands this body confirms that the usurpers occupying the Vatican understand their power rests not on the keys of Peter but on the manipulation of “expert” consensus. As Pius X condemned in *Pascendi Dominici Gregis*, the modernist places the “religious sense” of the faithful — here institutionalized in a commission of laymen and a woman — above the teaching authority of the hierarchy. Lex orandi, lex credendi (the law of praying is the law of believing) has been inverted into lex peritorum, lex credendi (the law of experts is the law of believing).
The Blasphemy of a Female “Theologian” in the Sacred Magisterium
The inclusion of a “religious sister” among the sixteen “priests” and seven laymen is a deliberate and scandalous violation of divine law and apostolic tradition. St. Paul, speaking by the Holy Ghost, commands: “Let women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but to be subject, as also the law saith” (1 Cor 14:34), and again: “I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to use authority over the man: but to be in silence” (1 Tim 2:12). The Fathers unanimously teach that the prophetic and teaching office in the Church is reserved to the sacred hierarchy. By appointing a woman to a body tasked with “clarifying Tradition,” the antipope and his prefect Fernández signal that the conciliar sect has definitively abandoned the sensus fidei for the sensus feminae, elevating the modernist idol of “inclusivity” above the immutable order of creation and redemption. This is not a pastoral innovation; it is a doctrinal rebellion against the Head of the Church, Jesus Christ, who chose only men as His Apostles. The presence of laymen — seven of them — further dissolves the distinction between the Ecclesia docens and the Ecclesia discens, realizing the Masonic ideal of a “priesthood of the people” that destroys the sacramental priesthood.
“Living Tradition”: The Modernist Evolution of Dogma
The first subcommission’s mandate — to determine “what Tradition with a capital T is, where it is found, how it is determined that something belongs to Tradition” — reveals the satanic core of the modernist system. Tradition is not a puzzle to be solved by historical-critical method, nor a datum to be located by “scientific contributions.” Tradition (*paradosis*) is the very life of the Church, the handing down of the deposit of faith *pure and entire* from the Apostles through the unbroken succession of valid bishops, guarded by the charism of infallibility. The Council of Trent defined: “This truth and discipline are contained in the written books and the unwritten traditions which, received by the Apostles from the mouth of Christ himself, or from the Apostles themselves, the Holy Ghost dictating, have come down even unto us, transmitted as it were from hand to hand” (*Sess. IV, Decree on the Canonical Scriptures*). The Vatican Council I taught: “For the Holy Ghost was promised to the successors of Peter not so that they might, by his revelation, make known some new doctrine, but that, by his assistance, they might religiously guard and faithfully expound the revelation or deposit of faith delivered through the Apostles” (*Pastor aeternus, Ch. 4*).
The conciliar sect, however, operates on the condemned proposition of *Lamentabili Sane Exitu* (1907): “Truth changes with man, because it develops with him, in him, and through him” (Prop. 58), and “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement… applicable to different times and places” (Prop. 59). By subjecting Tradition to “biblical, patristic, historical, philosophical, and even scientific contributions,” the ITC treats the divine deposit as raw material for human reconstruction. The phrase “thoughtfully assimilate what the various pontiffs, from Paul VI to Magnifica Humanitas, have clarified” is a confession that the “pontiffs” of the New Advent are not guardians of a fixed truth but architects of an evolving narrative. Magnifica Humanitas — whatever this latest effusion of the antipope may be — is placed on a continuum with Paul VI, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, and Francis, as if each “pontiff” adds a layer to a growing Tradition, rather than simply transmitting the one Faith. This is the heresy of evolutionism condemned by St. Pius X: “The dogmas which the Church proposes as revealed are not truths of divine origin but are a certain interpretation of religious facts, which the human mind has worked out with great effort” (*Lamentabili*, Prop. 22).
Inculturation: The Denial of the Catholicity of the One Truth
The second subcommission’s focus on “cultural forms through which the faith is transmitted,” “inculturation,” and “popular piety” completes the modernist revolution. Inculturation is the theological legitimization of religious syncretism. It proceeds from the false premise that the Gospel must be “incarnated” in every culture, as if the supernatural truth of revelation were insufficiently universal and required the admixture of pagan customs, symbols, and errors to become “relevant.” Pius XI, in *Quas Primas*, taught that “the Kingdom of Christ encompasses all men… not only Catholic nations… but also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ”. The Church does not adapt to cultures; she converts them. She baptizes cultures, purifying them of idolatry and error, not “dialoguing” with them as equal partners. The Syllabus of Pius IX condemns the proposition: “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true” (Prop. 15) and “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Prop. 18). Inculturation, as practiced by the conciliar sect, is the practical application of these condemned errors: it treats false religions and pagan cultures as “seeds of the Word” (*Nostra Aetate*, *Redemptoris Missio*) rather than as territories to be conquered for Christ the King. The reference to “popular piety” in this context is a smokescreen; the conciliar sect encourages superstitious and syncretistic practices (e.g., Pachamama worship, Buddhist-Zen “meditation,” Islamic “dialogue”) under the guise of respecting “cultural expressions,” while suppressing the true popular piety of the Rosary, the Latin Mass, and the traditional devotions that formed Christendom.
The “Scientific” Subversion of Theology
The explicit mention that the commission will draw on “scientific contributions” to clarify Tradition is the hallmark of the naturalism condemned by the Syllabus: “Human reason, without any reference whatsoever to God, is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood, and of good and evil” (Prop. 3). Theology is the *scientia sacra*, the science of divine things, whose principles are revealed truths, not empirical data. To subject the definition of Tradition to “scientific contributions” — whether historical criticism, sociology, anthropology, or psychology — is to place the supernatural under the judgment of the natural, the Creator under the microscope of the creature. This is the exact program of the Modernists described by Pius X: “Under the guise of more serious criticism and in the name of historical method, they aim at such a development of dogmas as appears to be their corruption” (*Pascendi*). The ITC’s methodology — “biblical, patristic, historical, philosophical, and even scientific” — is the methodus modernista: a pastiche of disciplines used to dissolve the certainty of faith into a flux of academic opinions. The result is predetermined: Tradition will be redefined as a “living process,” “dynamic,” “open to the future,” effectively denying its identity as the *depositum fidei* once for all delivered to the saints (Jude 1:3).
Cardinal Fernández: The Architect of Doctrinal Liquidation
That the topics “emerge from dialogue between the president of the commission [Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández] and the pope” exposes the personalist and authoritarian character of the conciliar sect’s pseudo-magisterium. Fernández, the author of *Fiducia Supplicans* and *Dignitas Infinita*, is the chief executor of the Bergoglian revolution, now continued under Prevost. His “dialogue” with the antipope replaces the collegial consultation of the true Roman Curia and the sensus fidelium of the universal Church. This is the tyranny of the expert foretold by Pius XII in *Humani Generis*: “Some imprudently and indiscreetly hold that evolution… explains the origin of all things… They destroy the very foundations of the faith.” Fernández’s theology is a theology of rupture, masked as “development.” His control of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith — the very office instituted to *condemn* errors like his own — is the supreme irony of the Great Apostasy. The ITC is his tool to manufacture “theological consensus” for the next wave of novelties: female “deacons,” blessing of sodomitical unions, intercommunion with heretics, and the definitive burial of the Mass of all ages.
The Catechism of the Conciliar Sect as “Authority”
The article concludes by citing the “Catechism of the Catholic Church (No. 78)” and *Dei Verbum* (Vatican II) as authoritative definitions of Tradition. This is the citation of a false catechism and a heretical conciliar document against the defined dogmas of Trent and Vatican I. The “Catechism” of 1992, promulgated by the apostate Wojtyla (John Paul II), contains the poison of religious liberty (*Dignitatis Humanae*), false ecumenism (*Unitatis Redintegratio*), and the new theology of the “People of God” (*Lumen Gentium*) that subverts the hierarchical constitution of the Church. *Dei Verbum* teaches that “Tradition develops in the Church with the help of the Holy Spirit” (DV 8), a formula deliberately ambiguous, allowing the modernist to claim that *new* doctrines (e.g., the legitimacy of false religions, the salvation of non-Christians without baptism) are “developments” of Tradition. The true Church knows no such development; she knows only *explicatio*, the unfolding of what was implicitly contained in the deposit, never *novitas* in substance. As St. Vincent of Lérins established the rule: “In the Catholic Church itself, all possible care must be taken, that we hold that faith which has been believed everywhere, always, by all” (*Commonitorium*, 2). The conciliar sect believes what was believed nowhere, never, by no one — until the “theologians” of the ITC invented it yesterday.
Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation Consolidates Its Pseudo-Magisterium
This appointment of twenty-four modernists to “clarify Tradition” is not a sign of vitality but of the death rattle of the conciliar sect. Having no valid Pope, no valid bishops (since the new rites of episcopal consecration are doubtful *in gravissimo*), and no valid Mass, the structures occupying the Vatican must simulate magisterial activity through committees of “experts.” They fear the immutable Tradition guarded by the true remnant — the bishops and priests who preserve the traditional rites and the unadulterated faith — because that Tradition condemns them as heretics, schismatics, and usurpers. The ITC’s work will produce nothing but more confusion, more “paradigm shifts,” more *aggiornamento* to the spirit of the world. Let the faithful know: there is no Tradition outside the Catholic Church, and the Catholic Church is not in the Vatican. She is where the Mass of Trent is offered, where the true bishops teach the Catechism of Trent, where the Syllabus is believed, and where the Kingship of Christ is proclaimed over all nations. The “International Theological Commission” is a Masonic tribunal judging the Bride of Christ in absentia. Its verdict is already written: *Tradition is dead; long live the evolution.* Anathema sit.
Source:
Pope Leo XIV tasks theologians with clarifying meaning of Church tradition (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 20.10.2026