The Vatican News portal, the official propaganda organ of the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost), reports on a statement by the French “Bishops’ Conference” (CEF) following the riots of October 17, 2026. The “Archbishops” Vincent Jordy (Tours) and Olivier de Germay (Lyon) diagnose a societal “malaise” rooted in consumerism and individualism, prescribing as remedy the revitalization of “intermediate bodies,” “democratic dialogue,” and the placement of a generic “God” at the center of a pluralistic society via an interreligious “march for peace.” This exercise in bureaucratic sociology exposes the total bankruptcy of the conciliar sect: it has nothing to offer but the very Masonic principles—religious liberty, separation of Church and State, the primacy of the temporal common good over the supernatural—which have produced the chaos it laments. There is no peace but in the Kingdom of Christ the King (Pius XI, Quas Primas), a Kingdom these false shepherds have betrayed by their adhesion to the novus ordo revolution.
The Conciliar Sect’s Capitulation to the Masonic Republic
The cited article reveals the “CEF” presidency acknowledging that “our country has fallen prey to unacceptable violence,” yet its proposed solutions remain entirely within the framework of the 1789 Revolution. “Archbishop” Jordy advocates for the “rehabilitation of ‘intermediate bodies’ (such as unions or associations)” weakened by “re-verticalization and re-centralization.” This is the language of subsidiarity stripped of its theological foundation, reduced to a Masonic corporatism designed to manage conflict within a secular order that explicitly denies the Rights of God.
Pope Pius IX, in the Syllabus of Errors (1864), condemned as error the proposition that “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55) and that “In the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship” (Error 77). The French “bishops” do not demand the repeal of the 1905 Law of Separation—the Masonic charter of French laïcité—nor the restoration of the Catholic State. They merely ask for a seat at the table of the “democratic dialogue” which the Syllabus condemns as the usurpation of Divine Authority by the “sum total of material forces” (Error 60). By accepting the legitimacy of the secular Republic and its “laïcité,” the conciliar hierarchy confirms its role as the chaplaincy of the Revolution.
The Idol of “Dialogue” and the Condemnation of Religious Liberty
“Archbishop” Jordy states: “I believe it is important, in a democratic society, that those who are grappling with questions or suffering are able to express them.” This elevation of “dialogue” and “expression” to supreme values is the hallmark of the Dignitatis Humanae heresy. The Syllabus condemns the idea that “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true” (Error 15) and that “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion” (Error 18).
The “Archbishop” of Lyon takes this indifferentism to its logical conclusion: “The solution is God… who else but Him can foster unity among all these people—people of different cultures, often different religions, and different political opinions? What is the common ground? The common ground is that we belong to the same humanity.” This is not the Catholic God, Deus Trinitas, who demands fides quaerens intellectum and submission to His revealed Truth in the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. It is the “God” of Freemasonry—the Great Architect of the Universe—who unites Jews, Muslims, and “Christians” in a syncretistic broth, denying the Royal Prerogative of Christ: “All power in heaven and on earth has been given to Me” (Mt 28:18).
Pius XI, in Quas Primas, teaches that “His reign encompasses also all non-Christians, so that most truly the entire human race is subject to the authority of Jesus Christ.” The “Archbishop” de Germay inverts this: he proposes a unity beneath Christ, founded on a naturalistic “common humanity,” effectively dethroning Christ the King in favor of a humanitarian idol. This is the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place (Mt 24:15).
The Abolition of the Social Kingship of Christ in Favor of a Generic “God”
The article notes that “for decades, the religious horizon was pushed aside—partly by taking a rigid stance on laïcité (secularism)—in an attempt to frame politics as the sole path toward a better society.” The “Archbishop” Jordy laments that “politics no longer offers the promise of achieving some grand ideal.” The remedy proposed? Not the Regnum Christi instituted by Pius XI precisely to combat this “plague of laicism,” but a vague “broadening the debate… to include everyone capable of bringing meaning to an era that is cruelly lacking it.”
Quas Primas declares: “If men were ever to recognize Christ’s royal authority over themselves, both privately and publicly, then unheard-of blessings would flow upon the whole society, such as due freedom, order, and tranquility, and concord and peace.” The conciliar “bishops” refuse this recognition. They speak of “God” without Christ, “peace” without the Pax Christi in Regno Christi, “justice” without the Justitia Dei. They propose a “march for peace” where “disagreements between Jews, Christians, and Muslims… do not make us enemies.” St. Pius X, in Lamentabili Sane Exitu, condemned the Modernist proposition that “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function, i.e., as binding in action, rather than as principles of belief” (Error 26). Here, dogma is discarded entirely for the “practical function” of social cohesion. The “God” invoked is a tool for “unity,” not the Terminus of all creation.
The False Shepherds: Manifest Heretics Deprived of Office Ipso Facto
The men speaking in this article—Jordy, de Germay, and the entire “CEF” presidency—are not Catholic bishops. They are manifest heretics who, by their public adherence to the Second Vatican Council’s doctrines of religious liberty (Dignitatis Humanae), ecumenism (Unitatis Redintegratio), and collegiality (Lumen Gentium), have ipso facto severed themselves from the Church and lost all jurisdiction.
St. Robert Bellarmine, cited in the Defense of Sedevacantism, teaches: “A manifest heretic cannot be Pope… A non-Christian in no way can be Pope… he who is not a Christian is not a member of the Church, and a manifest heretic is not a Christian… therefore, a manifest heretic cannot be Pope.” This principle applies a fortiori to bishops. Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code states: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration… if the cleric: … 4. Publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio confirms that promotion of a heretic is “null, void, and of no effect.”
These “bishops” have publicly defected by implementing the conciliar revolution: the New Mass (a Protestantized memorial), the new rites of ordination (doubtful validity), and the teaching of religious liberty (condemned by Gregory XVI, Pius IX, Leo XIII, St. Pius X, Pius XI, Pius XII). They are intrusi, hirelings who flee when the wolf comes (Jn 10:12). Their “solidarity with workers” and “prayer for peace” are the whimpering of wolves in sheep’s clothing, devoid of sacramental grace and canonical mission. Ubi haeresis, ibi non Ecclesia.
The Reduction of the Supernatural to Sociological Therapy
The article’s anthropological vision is purely naturalistic. “Archbishop” de Germay observes: “We see people who have everything they need to live, yet whose thirst for happiness remains unquenched.” The solution offered? Not the Sanctifying Grace won by the Unbloody Sacrifice of Calvary, not the Most Holy Eucharist, not the Sacrament of Penance, but “stepping outside of oneself in order to serve others” and “rewarding experiences” like the Lourdes trips where “teenagers… are transformed because they have experienced the joy of being of service.”
This is Pelagianism disguised as pastoral care. It replaces the theologia crucis with the theologia gloriae of humanitarian activism. Lamentabili Sane Exitu condemns the Modernist error that “Faith, as assent of the mind, is ultimately based on a sum of probabilities” (Error 25) and that “The dogmas of faith should be understood according to their practical function” (Error 26). The “Archbishop” reduces the Faith to a therapeutic technique for “anxiety-inducing” times. There is no mention of peccatum, gratia, judicium, infernum, or the Indulgentia Plenaria. The “young people” are not called to conversion and the Crown of Thorns, but to “generosity” and “vision for the future.” This is the “cult of man” condemned by Pius XI in Quas Primas as the fruit of “laicism, its errors and wicked endeavors.”
The Interreligious Peace March: A Ritual of the New World Order
The proposal for a “march for peace” uniting “Jews, Christians, and Muslims” is the liturgical act of the one-world religion. It mimics the Assisi abominations of Wojtyla (John Paul II) and Ratzinger (Benedict XVI). It signifies the definitive apostasy of the conciliar hierarchy from the Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus dogma.
The “Archbishop” de Germay says: “What is the common ground? The common ground is that we belong to the same humanity.” This denies the necessitas medii—the necessity of the Church for salvation. It places the natural order above the supernatural. St. Cyprian teaches: “He cannot have God for his Father who has not the Church for his Mother.” The “march for peace” is a procession in honor of the Antichrist, preparing the world for the “man of sin” who “sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God” (2 Thess 2:4). The “bishops” of the neo-church are its precursors.
Conclusion: No Peace Without the Catholic Kingship of Christ
The chaos in France is the direct fruit of the Masonic Republic and the conciliar sect’s betrayal of the Social Kingship of Christ. The “bishops'” call for “dialogue,” “intermediate bodies,” and a generic “God” is a prescription for more of the same poison. Quas Primas remains the immutable charter: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.”
True Catholic bishops—validly ordained in the apostolic succession, holding the integral Faith, rejecting the conciliar errors—would not call for a “march for peace” with infidels. They would call for the Consecration of France to the Sacred Heart (as requested by Christ to St. Margaret Mary Alacoque, not the Masonic caricature of Fatima), the restoration of the Catholic Confessional State, the suppression of public blasphemy and false worship, and the public reparation for the crimes of the Revolution. They would preach Conversio ad Dominum, not “dialogue.”
The “Church in France” described by Vatican News is a synagogue of Satan (Apoc 2:9), a paramasonic structure occupying the visible patrimony of the Church of the Martyrs. The only path to “meaning” and “peace” is the submission of individuals, families, and the French State to Christus Rex. Non est alia salus (Acts 4:12). Viva Cristo Rey!
Source:
Church in France seeks to help restore a sense of meaning (vaticannews.va)
Date: 20.10.2026