Vatican News portal reports that “Cardinal” George Jacob Koovakad, Prefect of the “Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue,” addressed an Ahimsa Day celebration at the British Parliament in London on October 19, 2026. The “Cardinal” praised Jainism’s “comprehensive and rigorous understanding of nonviolence,” equated it with Christian teaching citing “Pope” Benedict XVI and “Pope” Francis, and celebrated forty years of dialogue initiated by the scandalous 1986 Assisi meeting. He urged religions to become “bridges” for the “common good,” citing “Pope” Leo XIV’s call for unity. This spectacle is not a witness to Christ the King but the consummation of the Masonic ecumenical project, replacing the *Pax Christi in Regno Christi* with a naturalistic pacifism that denies the Social Kingship of Christ and the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation.
The Masonic Stage: British Parliament as Temple of Naturalism
The choice of venue—the British Parliament, the very seat of the Anglican schism and modern democratic idolatry—reveals the purely naturalistic and political character of this spectacle. The “Cardinal” Koovakad stands not as a successor of the Apostles preaching *Jesus Christ, and Him crucified* (1 Cor 2:2), but as a functionary of the conciliar sect legitimizing the secular order. The Syllabus of Pope Pius IX condemns the proposition that “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church” (Error 55). Here, the “prefect” of a “dicastery” enters the halls of Caesar not to demand the recognition of Christ’s Kingship over legislation—as Pius XI commanded in *Quas Primas*: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ”—but to dialogue with a pagan sect on the neutral ground of “nonviolence.” This is the *laicism* Pius XI denounced: “the denial of Christ the Lord’s reign over all nations.”
Indifferentism Masquerading as Dialogue: The Condemned Error of Assisi
The “Cardinal” explicitly traces this collaboration to the 1986 Assisi meeting convened by the heretic “Pope” John Paul II (Wojtyla). He calls it a “historic interreligious gathering for peace” and anticipates its 40th anniversary. This single reference condemns the entire enterprise. The Syllabus condemns the proposition: “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion, in which form it is given to please God equally as in the Catholic Church” (Error 18). By extension, Jainism—a pagan religion denying the Blessed Trinity, the Incarnation, and the Divinity of Christ—is here treated as a *via salutis* equally pleasing to God. The “Cardinal” states: “cooperation between religious traditions does not require them to abandon their distinctive identities.” This is the very definition of *indifferentism* condemned by Gregory XVI in *Mirari Vos* and Pius IX in the Syllabus (Error 15, 16): “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true… Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation.”
“Religions must build bridges… The Jain–Catholic dialogue must become such a bridge, connecting communities, educating young people, defending the dignity of life and responding together to violence, poverty and ecological crisis.”
This is the *ecumenism project* exposed in the *False Fatima Apparitions* document: “The imprecise formulation ‘conversion of Russia’ (without specifying Catholicism) opens the way to religious relativism. It can serve to legitimize dialogue with schismatic Orthodoxy.” Here, it legitimizes dialogue with idolaters. There is *no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved* (Acts 4:12). To propose Jain “Ahimsa” as a parallel path to Christian charity is to deny the *necessitas medii* of the Church and the Cross.
Ahimsa vs. Caritas: Equating Natural Virtue with Supernatural Grace
The linguistic sleight of hand is diabolical. The “Cardinal” describes Ahimsa as “nonviolence towards all living beings, not only through physical actions but also in thought and speech,” rooted in “respect for every form of life.” He then parallels this with “Christian teaching on nonviolence… rooted in the life and example of Jesus Christ,” citing Christ’s command to “love one’s enemies” and “put away his sword.”
This is a category error of heretical proportions. Christian *charity* (supernatural love of God for His own sake and neighbor for God’s sake) is infinitely distinct from Jain *Ahimsa* (a natural, ascetic avoidance of karmic debt for self-liberation). The former flows from *sanctifying grace* and the *hypostatic union*; the latter from a pagan metaphysics denying a Creator God. *Lamentabili Sane Exitu* condemns the Modernist error: “The dogmas which the Church proposes as revealed are not truths of divine origin but are a certain interpretation of religious facts, which the human mind has worked out with great effort” (Prop. 22). By equating the *fruit* (nonviolence) while ignoring the *root* (Faith in the Triune God), the “Cardinal” reduces the Gospel to a mere ethical code, a “broad and liberal Protestantism” (Prop. 65).
Furthermore, the “Cardinal” cites “Pope” Benedict XVI (Ratzinger) that “Christian nonviolence does not mean surrendering to evil, but responding to evil with good.” This is a half-truth weaponized for pacifism. True Christian resistance to evil demands the *confession of truth* and the *rejection of error*. St. Pius X teaches in *Lamentabili*: “The Church, in condemning errors, has no right to require any internal assent from the faithful to the pronouncements issued by the Church” (Prop. 7 – condemned). The conciliar sect *refuses* to condemn errors (Jain idolatry, pantheism, denial of Christ) precisely to build its “bridges.”
The “Nonviolence” Heresy: Pacifism Detached from the Rights of God
“In a world wounded by wars, terrorism, hatred, discrimination and the exploitation of nature… Ahimsa offers a powerful and timely message… It is neither weakness nor indifference. It is a courageous commitment to justice, reconciliation and peace.”
Note the litany of secular concerns: “wars, terrorism, hatred, discrimination, exploitation of nature.” *Total silence on sin, heresy, apostasy, the ruin of the liturgy, the loss of the Faith.* This is the “secularism of our times, so-called laicism” Pius XI identified in *Quas Primas* as the plague poisoning society. The “Cardinal” speaks of “justice” but defines it not as *rendering to God His due* (latria, public worship, Catholic State) but as “reconciliation” among false religions.
Pius XI teaches: “Peace is only possible in the kingdom of Christ… When God and Jesus Christ were removed from laws and states… the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” The “nonviolence” preached here is the *pax Masonica*—the peace of the syncretistic “universal brotherhood” of the Masonic lodges, the “yeast of unity in a fragmented world” invoked by the antipope Leo XIV (Prevost). It is the peace of the *Civitas Diaboli* masquerading as the *Civitas Dei*.
The Usurping Hierarchy: Koovakad and the Antipope Leo XIV
The article identifies the speaker as “Cardinal George Jacob Koovakad, Prefect of the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue.” According to the principles established by St. Robert Bellarmine and Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code (cited in *Defense of Sedevacantism*), a manifest heretic loses office *ipso facto*. The claimants to the Holy See since 1958 (John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now Leo XIV/Prevost) have publicly professed the heresies of religious liberty, ecumenism, and collegiality—condemned by the Syllabus, *Quas Primas*, *Pascendi*, and *Lamentabili*. They are not Popes; they are usurpers. Their “Cardinals” are not Cardinals. Their “Dicasteries” are offices of a paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican.
The “Cardinal” cites “Pope Leo XIV’s call for religions to be the ‘yeast of unity in a fragmented world’.” Robert Prevost, a manifest Modernist, has no authority. His “call” is the voice of the *abomination of desolation standing in the holy place* (Matt 24:15). The faithful are warned: “You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men” (1 Cor 7:23).
Symptomatic Conclusion: The Abomination of Desolation in Action
This event at the British Parliament is a perfect microcosm of the conciliar apostasy:
1. **Naturalism:** Religion reduced to a tool for “sustainable development,” “ecological crisis,” and “social cohesion.”
2. **Indifferentism:** Jainism and Catholicism placed on equal footing as “bridges.”
3. **Silence on the Supernatural:** Zero mention of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, the Sacraments, the State of Grace, the Last Judgment, or *Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus*.
4. **Subversion of Authority:** A usurping “Cardinal” legitimizing a schismatic Parliament and a pagan cult.
The “Cardinal” concludes: “May we disarm our hearts and walk together in the noble spirit of Ahimsa!” The true Catholic, holding the integral Faith, responds with St. Athanasius: *Non est aliud nomen sub caelo datum hominibus in quo oporteat nos salvari.* We do not walk with Ahimsa; we fight under the Standard of the Cross. *Viva Cristo Rey!*
Source:
Cardinal Koovakad: Nonviolence is courageous commitment to justice (vaticannews.va)
Date: 20.10.2026