EWTN News portal reports that Denver “Archbishop” James Golka, installed in March 2026 after serving as “bishop” of Colorado Springs, led a prayer at an October 22, 2026 meeting in the Oval Office between President Donald Trump and several United States “bishops.” Golka prayed for the Holy Spirit to “surround our country, to protect us against any influence of evil,” and later defended his participation as simply “being a Catholic priest,” claiming the event was an opportunity to “evangelize” and “share our faith in season and out of season,” while denying any political endorsement. The “Archdiocese of Denver” asserted that praying for public leaders is a “long Catholic practice” dating to the Apostolic Age. This grotesque spectacle of a conciliar hierarch kneeling in the seat of temporal power to bless the very embodiment of liberal democracy exposes the total capitulation of the neo-church to the spirit of the world and its utter rejection of the Social Kingship of Christ the King.
The Factual Farce: A Photo Op for Caesar, A Betrayal of the Altar
The reported facts reveal a calculated political theater. The “archbishop” himself admits he “knew people might be upset” and that the event could be “used for political purposes,” yet proceeded regardless. This is not pastoral zeal; it is human respect (humanae respectus) elevated to a governing principle. The meeting’s agenda—”religious freedom, school choice, religious visas, and life policy”—is the standard laundry list of the conciliar sect’s political action committee masquerading as episcopal conference. Nowhere is there mention of the Social Reign of Christ the King, the condemnation of laicism, the duty of the State to profess the Catholic Faith, or the anathema against religious liberty as defined by the Syllabus of Errors (Errors 15, 77, 78, 79). Golka’s prayer for the “country” and “leaders” stripped of any demand for their explicit submission to Christ the King is not a Catholic prayer; it is a Masonic invocation for the prosperity of the secular city.
Linguistic Deconstruction: The Vocabulary of the Neo-Church
The rhetoric employed is a masterclass in modernist equivocation. Golka speaks of “sharing our faith” and “witnessing to the dignity of every human person”—the lingua franca of the Second Vatican Council’s Gaudium et Spes and Dignitatis Humanae—rather than the depositum fidei and the regnum Christi. His insistence that “the Church cannot champion any candidate or party” while simultaneously staging a highly publicized event with the sitting President is a contradiction that fools only the willfully blind. The phrase “I was being a Catholic priest” is the ultimate blasphemy: a minister of the Novus Ordo sect, ordained in the invalid Pauline rite (1968), claiming the character of the Catholic priesthood while functioning as a chaplain to the revolution. The “Archdiocese of Denver” press release invoking the “Apostolic Age” is a deliberate falsification; the early Church prayed for the Emperor’s conversion and the cessation of persecution, not with the Emperor in his palace as a partner in governance, legitimizing his authority over the Church’s affairs.
Theological Anathema: Violation of Quas Primas and the Syllabus
Pope Pius XI, in Quas Primas (1925), teaches with unshakeable authority: “The state must leave the same freedom to the members of Orders and Congregations… The annual celebration of this solemnity will also remind states that not only private individuals, but also rulers and governments have the duty to publicly honor Christ and obey Him… for it will remind them of the final judgment, in which Christ, whom not only was cast out of the state, but was also forgotten and ignored through contempt, will very severely avenge these insults.” Golka’s appearance in the Oval Office does not “remind the state” of its duty to honor Christ; it reinforces the state’s usurpation of Christ’s rights. It validates the error condemned by Pius IX in the Syllabus (Error 55): “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.” By entering the Oval Office as a petitioner for “religious freedom” and “school choice,” Golka acknowledges the State as the grantor of rights, contradicting Quas Primas: “The Church, established by Christ as a perfect society, demands for itself by a right belonging to it, which it cannot renounce, full freedom and independence from secular authority.”
Furthermore, the prayer for the “country” abstracted from the Corpus Christi is idolatry of the nation-state. St. Pius X in Lamentabili Sane Exitu (1907) condemned the Modernist proposition that “Christ did not proclaim any specific, all-encompassing doctrine suitable for all times and peoples, but rather initiated a certain religious movement, applied or applicable to different times and places” (Prop. 59). Golka’s “evangelization” reduced to vague “dignity” and “prayer for leaders” is precisely this Modernist adaptation. The Syllabus (Error 39) condemns: “The State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.” By seeking “religious visas” and “school choice” from Trump, the conciliar “bishops” implicitly confess the State as the source of their rights.
Symptomatic Exposure: The Conciliar Sect as the Abomination of Desolation
This event is not an anomaly; it is the modus operandi of the post-conciliar structure. The “Defense of Sedevacantism” file demonstrates that a manifest heretic loses office ipso facto (Bellarmine, De Romano Pontifice; Canon 188.4; Cum ex Apostolatus Officio). The line of claimants to the See of Peter since 1958—John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, Benedict XVI, Francis, and now Leo XIV (Prevost)—have all publicly adhered to the heresies of religious liberty, ecumenism, and collegiality, thereby severing themselves from the Church. Consequently, their “bishops” (ordained in the new rite, often by consecrators of doubtful validity like the Freemason Liénart in Lefebvre’s case) possess no jurisdiction, no mission, and no sacramental character guaranteed by the Church. Golka is a layman in vestments, a functionary of the paramasonic structure occupying the Vatican.
The “False Fatima Apparitions” file correctly identifies the Fatima narrative as a “Masonic psychological operation” diverting attention from the “modernist apostasy within the Church.” Golka’s performance serves the same diversion: it offers pious conservatives a “traditional” visual (a bishop praying!) while the substance of the Faith—the Kingship of Christ, the integral Faith, the rejection of liberalism—is abandoned. The “two Lucia sisters” theory aside, the file’s conclusion stands: “The Fatima message: Theologically contradictory to Catholic doctrine. A tool to divert attention from modernism. A potential Masonic ‘psychological operation’ against the Church.” The Oval Office prayer is the 2026 iteration of this operation: a potemkin village of piety concealing the abomination of desolation (Matt. 24:15) in the holy place.
The Only Catholic Response: Non Possumus
True Catholic bishops—those validly consecrated before 1968, holding the Faith entire, rejecting the conciliar errors—would have refused the invitation, or entered only to proclaim, as Pope Celestine I did regarding Nestorius: “He who has departed from the faith with such preaching cannot depose or remove anyone.” They would have declared, with Pius XI: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed.” They would have warned Trump, as St. Ambrose warned Theodosius, that he stands within the Church, not above it.
Golka’s “heartbreak” at criticism is the crocodile tears of a hireling (John 10:12-13). The faithful remnant—true Catholics adhering to the Sede Vacante position—recognize this event for what it is: a public act of apostasy by the conciliar hierarchy, sealing their alliance with the Antichrist’s kingdom of man. Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus imperat—and He has no part with Belial (2 Cor. 6:15).
Source:
Denver archbishop responds to criticism over Trump prayer meeting: ‘I was being a Catholic priest’ (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 24.10.2026