EWTN News portal reports that on October 23, 2026, the structures occupying the Vatican announced a reciprocal exchange of honorary religious titles between the antipope Leo XIV (Robert Prevost) and King Charles III of England, the nominal head of the Anglican sect. The Argentinian usurper was named “Papal Confrater” of the College of St. George at Windsor, while the British monarch received the title “Royal Confrater” of the Basilica of St. Paul Outside the Walls. This unprecedented spectacle, hailed by the conciliar media as a “historic step for Christian unity,” constitutes a public, ritualized apostasy: the Vicar of Christ is mimed by a manifest heretic who fraternizes with the supreme governor of a schismatic body born of rebellion against the Roman Pontiff, thereby denying the unica salus (one salvation) found only in the Catholic Church.
The Theatrics of False Unity: A Violation of Mortalium Animos
The cited article frames this exchange as a “visible sign of spiritual fellowship, ecumenical friendship and Christian fraternity,” undertaken “mindful of the value of Christian unity, in an increasingly polarised and turbulent world.” This language is the precise vernacular of the condemned heresy of ecumenism. Pope Pius XI, in Mortalium Animos (1928), thundered against this very deception: “The unity of the Church cannot be achieved except by the return of the dissidents to the one true Church of Christ” (AAS 20, 1928, p. 17). He explicitly forbade Catholics from participating in non-Catholic religious assemblies (conventicula), stating that “it is not lawful for the faithful to take part in the assemblies of non-Catholics… for the union of Christians can only be promoted by promoting the return to the one true Church of Christ.”
The antipope Prevost, by praying with the Anglican king in the Sistine Chapel and accepting a “confraternity” from a Protestant chapel, does not “build bridges”; he demolishes the extra Ecclesiam nulla salus dogma. He treats the Anglican sect — founded on the repudiation of papal primacy, the sacrifice of the Mass, and the sacramental priesthood — as a legitimate “Christian tradition” possessing valid spiritual goods to share. This is indifferentism in its most brazen form, condemned by the Syllabus of Errors (Prop. 16, 17, 18): “Man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation… Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion.” The conciliar sect, by this act, formally adheres to these condemned propositions.
The Invalidity of Anglican Orders and the Farce of “Confraternity”
The article speaks of “historical ties” between the College of St. George and the Holy See, interrupted by the “Reformation.” It omits the doctrinal reality: the “Reformation” was a revolt, a schism formalized by Henry VIII’s adulterous defiance of Clement VII. The Anglican hierarchy was definitively declared null and void by Pope Leo XIII in Apostolicae Curae (1896): “Ordinations carried out according to the Anglican rite have been, and are, absolutely null and utterly void.” There is no priesthood, no sacrifice, no valid episcopacy in the Church of England. Consequently, the “Dean and Canons of Windsor” are laymen in ecclesiastical costume, possessing zero spiritual jurisdiction.
To speak of the antipope becoming a “Papal Confrater” of a non-existent canonical entity is a juridical and theological absurdity. A confraternity (confraternitas) is a public association of the faithful erected by competent ecclesiastical authority (Canon 702, 1917 Code). The “College of St. George” lacks this authority. Simultaneously, King Charles III, a layman who presides over a heretical establishment, is installed as “Royal Confrater” of a papal basilica. This mimics the medieval jus patronatus but inverts it: a heretic is honored at the tomb of the Apostle to the Gentiles. St. Paul Outside the Walls, consecrated to the Doctor of the Gentiles who anathematized those preaching “another gospel” (Gal 1:8), is thus profaned by the presence of the supreme governor of a church that denies the Petrine primacy and the sacrificial nature of the Mass.
The Usurper Prevost Manifests Heresy: Automatic Loss of Office per Bellarmine and Cum ex Apostolatus Officio
From the perspective of integral Catholic theology, the actions of Robert Prevost (“Leo XIV”) constitute notorious and public heresy. By participating in joint prayer with a heretic (worship in communicatio in sacris), by recognizing the Anglican sect as a “Christian tradition” with which “unity” is sought via dialogue rather than conversion, and by accepting honors from the head of that sect, he denies de facto the necessity of the Catholic Church for salvation and the visibility of the Church’s unity.
St. Robert Bellarmine, the Doctor of the Church on the Roman Pontiff, teaches unequivocally: “A Pope who is a manifest heretic, by that very fact ceases to be Pope and head, just as he ceases to be a Christian and member of the body of the Church: by which things he may be judged and punished by the Church” (De Romano Pontifice, lib. 2, cap. 30). Bellarmine clarifies that this deposition is ipso facto, requiring no declaratory sentence: “Heretics are already outside the Church before excommunication and deprived of all jurisdiction. They have indeed been condemned by their own judgment… that is, they have been cut off from the body of the Church without excommunication.”
Pope Paul IV’s Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio (1559) confirms this with the fullness of apostolic authority: “If at any time it shall appear that any… Roman Pontiff… has defected from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy: (i) his promotion or elevation… shall be null, void, and of no effect.” The Bull requires no trial, only the fact of defection (defecerit a fide Catholica). Prevost’s public prayer with the Anglican king and the mutual bestowal of “religious titles” is the factum of defection. He is not the Pope; he is a manifest heretic occupying the See of Peter, fulfilling the prophecy of the abominatio desolationis in the holy place (Matt 24:15).
Canon 188.4 of the 1917 Code codifies this divine law: “Every office becomes vacant by the mere fact and without any declaration… if the cleric: 4. Publicly defects from the Catholic faith.” Fr. McDevitt notes that “joining… a non-Catholic sect is not required to establish the publicity which the canon demands.” Public defection occurs through formal heresy. Prevost has publicly defected.
The Kingship of Christ Betrayed: Quas Primas vs. Secularist “Dialogue”
The article notes the inscription on the new chair at St. Paul’s: Ut unum sint (“That they may be one,” Jn 17:21). The conciliar sect weaponizes this verse to justify a unity of compromise. Pius XI, in Quas Primas (1925), establishes the true foundation of unity: the Social Kingship of Christ. He writes: “When God and Jesus Christ… were removed from laws and states and when authority was derived not from God but from men, the foundations of that authority were destroyed… the entire human society had to be shaken, because it lacked a stable and strong foundation.”
Pius XI commands: “Let rulers of states therefore not refuse public veneration and obedience to the reigning Christ, but let them fulfill this duty themselves and with their people, if they wish to maintain their authority inviolate and contribute to the increase of their homeland’s happiness.” King Charles III, as “Supreme Governor of the Church of England,” embodies the laicism and secularism condemned in Quas Primas. He heads a national church established by an act of Parliament (Act of Supremacy), the very essence of Erastianism — the subjection of the spiritual to the temporal — condemned in the Syllabus (Prop. 19, 20, 39, 55).
Instead of calling the King to abjure his heresy, recognize the Social Kingship of Christ, and submit to the Roman Pontiff (as St. Augustine of Canterbury did), the antipope Prevost validates the King’s false religious authority. He exchanges “Orders” (Order of Pius IX for Order of the Bath), treating the honors of a Protestant potentate as equivalent to papal distinctions. This is the “cult of man” denounced by Pius X in Pascendi and Lamentabili Sane Exitu (Prop. 58, 59): the replacement of the City of God with the City of Man, where “authority is nothing else but numbers and the sum total of material forces” (Syllabus, Prop. 60).
The Syllabus Condemned This: Indifferentism and the Separation of Church and State
The entire spectacle is a living embodiment of the errors condemned by Bl. Pius IX in the Syllabus Errorum (1864).
* **Prop. 15:** “Every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true.” The event celebrates the King’s “freedom” to remain Anglican while being honored by the “pope.”
* **Prop. 18:** “Protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion.” The mutual “confraternity” presupposes equal spiritual dignity.
* **Prop. 55:** “The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.” The conciliar sect, having no temporal power, seeks validation from the secular state (the UK Crown), effectively endorsing the separation by treating the State’s head as a spiritual peer.
* **Prop. 77-80:** Condemnation of Modern Liberalism: the idea that the “Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself… with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.” Prevost’s performance is the epitome of this reconciliation with the world.
The article mentions the “progress made in relations between the Catholic Church, the Church of England, and the Anglican Communion.” This “progress” is the apostasy of the conciliar hierarchy. True progress is the conversion of England (Anglia dos Mariae), not the legitimization of its schism.
Symptomatic Level: The Conciliar Sect as the “Abomination of Desolation”
This event is not an anomaly; it is the modus operandi of the post-conciliar structure since the Robber Council (Vatican II). The “Decree on Ecumenism” Unitatis Redintegratio mandated this false unity. The “Assisi” meetings (1986, 2002, 2011) were the dress rehearsals. Now, under the Argentinian usurper Prevost, the mask falls completely. The antipope sits in the Sistine Chapel — painted with the terrifying Last Judgment of Michelangelo — and prays with a man who denies the Papacy, the Mass, and the Communion of Saints.
The “chair” for the antipope at Windsor, consecrated alongside a “mosaic icon of Christ of Cefalù,” signifies the enthronement of the Antichrist’s precursor in the very heart of the Anglican establishment. St. Paul warns: “Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God” (2 Thess 2:3-4).
The true Church of Christ — una, sancta, catholica, et apostolica — does not reside in the Vatican gardens exchanging baubles with Protestant monarchs. She resides in the catacombs, in the chapels where the Missale Romanum of St. Pius V is offered by priests of unquestionable validity, where the faithful cling to the Traditio without admixture. The “titles” exchanged on October 23, 2026, are not honors; they are the badges of betrayal. Quis ut Deus? Who is like unto God? Certainly not the usurper in white, nor the king in purple, but only Christ the King, whose reign they both publicly deny.
Source:
For first time in 500 years, pope and king of England bestow religious titles on each other (ewtnnews.com)
Date: 26.10.2026